Neuropsychologists' Engagement With and Cognitive Assessment in Parkinson's Disease: A Mixed Methods Australian Investigation.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
James M King, Nadeeka N Dissanayaka, Deborah Brooks, Leander K Mitchell, Kumareshan Sivakumaran, Jihyun Yang, Deepa Sriram, Sharon L Naismith, Nancy A Pachana, Rebecca Gough, Dana Pourzinal
{"title":"Neuropsychologists' Engagement With and Cognitive Assessment in Parkinson's Disease: A Mixed Methods Australian Investigation.","authors":"James M King, Nadeeka N Dissanayaka, Deborah Brooks, Leander K Mitchell, Kumareshan Sivakumaran, Jihyun Yang, Deepa Sriram, Sharon L Naismith, Nancy A Pachana, Rebecca Gough, Dana Pourzinal","doi":"10.1177/08919887261462186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveA mixed methods study was conducted to investigate how clinical neuropsychologists engage with and provide cognitive assessment to persons living with Parkinson's disease (PD). Current practices were examined to identify service gaps and generate recommendations for future research.MethodAustralian neuropsychologists experienced in PD assessment were recruited to complete an online survey (N = 20) and semi-structured interviews (N = 5). Quantitative data was summarised descriptively. Qualitative data underwent coding reliability thematic analysis. Findings were combined through mixed methods integration to identify service gaps.ResultsIntegration revealed four service gaps for neuropsychologists when assessing persons living with PD. These were: (1) varied assessment practices across neuropsychologists; (2) infrequent engagement of neuropsychologists; (3) suboptimal test availability for PD assessment; and (4) limited integration of digital modalities within practice.ConclusionsThe findings provide preliminary observation into service gaps for neuropsychologists in PD assessment to help direct future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887261462186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887261462186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveA mixed methods study was conducted to investigate how clinical neuropsychologists engage with and provide cognitive assessment to persons living with Parkinson's disease (PD). Current practices were examined to identify service gaps and generate recommendations for future research.MethodAustralian neuropsychologists experienced in PD assessment were recruited to complete an online survey (N = 20) and semi-structured interviews (N = 5). Quantitative data was summarised descriptively. Qualitative data underwent coding reliability thematic analysis. Findings were combined through mixed methods integration to identify service gaps.ResultsIntegration revealed four service gaps for neuropsychologists when assessing persons living with PD. These were: (1) varied assessment practices across neuropsychologists; (2) infrequent engagement of neuropsychologists; (3) suboptimal test availability for PD assessment; and (4) limited integration of digital modalities within practice.ConclusionsThe findings provide preliminary observation into service gaps for neuropsychologists in PD assessment to help direct future research.

神经心理学家对帕金森病的参与和认知评估:一项混合方法的澳大利亚调查。
目的通过一项混合方法研究,探讨临床神经心理学家如何参与帕金森病(PD)患者的认知评估。审查了目前的做法,以确定服务差距,并为今后的研究提出建议。方法招募有PD评估经验的澳大利亚神经心理学家完成在线调查(N = 20)和半结构化访谈(N = 5)。定量数据进行描述性总结。定性数据进行编码可靠性专题分析。研究结果通过混合方法整合来确定服务差距。结果整合显示神经心理学家在评估PD患者时存在四个服务缺口。这些是:(1)不同神经心理学家的评估实践;(2)神经心理学家很少参与;(3) PD评估测试可用性次优;(4)数字模式在实践中的有限整合。结论初步观察了神经心理学家在PD评估中的服务差距,有助于指导未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书