FDG-PET/CT Demonstrates Superior Detection of Multiorgan Involvement in Paracoccidioidomycosis Compared With Conventional Staging.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Pricila G Cunha, Maria Emilia Seren Takahashi, Raquel S B Stucchi, Mariana Paixão Ribeiro, Thiago F Souza, Carmino Antonio de Souza, Barbara Juarez Amorim, Maria Luiza Moretti, Plinio Trabasso, Celso Dario Ramos
{"title":"FDG-PET/CT Demonstrates Superior Detection of Multiorgan Involvement in Paracoccidioidomycosis Compared With Conventional Staging.","authors":"Pricila G Cunha, Maria Emilia Seren Takahashi, Raquel S B Stucchi, Mariana Paixão Ribeiro, Thiago F Souza, Carmino Antonio de Souza, Barbara Juarez Amorim, Maria Luiza Moretti, Plinio Trabasso, Celso Dario Ramos","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) is a neglected systemic mycosis in which accurate staging is critical but challenging with conventional methods. This study evaluated 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with standard evaluation for PCM staging and assessed its impact on disease severity classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four patients with confirmed PCM (treatment-naïve or with suspected treatment failure) underwent conventional staging and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. Disease severity was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. PET/CT images were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively (SUVmax, TMLV, TLG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PET/CT detected more than twice as many lesions as conventional evaluation (150 vs 62; mean 4.4 ± 1.6 vs 1.8 ± 0.9 affected organ systems per patient), with statistically significant superiority for lymph node, pulmonary, and adrenal involvement (McNemar's test, P < .05). PET/CT reclassified 97% of patients as multifocal versus 59% by conventional staging and produced a significant unidirectional shift toward higher severity-the proportion classified as severe increased from 70.6% to 91.2% (P = .016). Patients with suspected treatment failure showed significantly lower TMLV and TLG than treatment-naïve patients (P < .05). Quantitative PET parameters correlated with serological titers and inflammatory markers (P < .05), and PET/CT detected four times as many sites as gallium-67 scintigraphy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>18F-FDG PET/CT systematically reveals greater disease burden than conventional evaluation in PCM, reclassifying most patients toward higher severity with direct implications for treatment duration and follow-up. Where available, it should be considered an important complementary modality for initial disease assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"e515-e525"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13644870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag372","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) is a neglected systemic mycosis in which accurate staging is critical but challenging with conventional methods. This study evaluated 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with standard evaluation for PCM staging and assessed its impact on disease severity classification.

Methods: Thirty-four patients with confirmed PCM (treatment-naïve or with suspected treatment failure) underwent conventional staging and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. Disease severity was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. PET/CT images were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively (SUVmax, TMLV, TLG).

Results: PET/CT detected more than twice as many lesions as conventional evaluation (150 vs 62; mean 4.4 ± 1.6 vs 1.8 ± 0.9 affected organ systems per patient), with statistically significant superiority for lymph node, pulmonary, and adrenal involvement (McNemar's test, P < .05). PET/CT reclassified 97% of patients as multifocal versus 59% by conventional staging and produced a significant unidirectional shift toward higher severity-the proportion classified as severe increased from 70.6% to 91.2% (P = .016). Patients with suspected treatment failure showed significantly lower TMLV and TLG than treatment-naïve patients (P < .05). Quantitative PET parameters correlated with serological titers and inflammatory markers (P < .05), and PET/CT detected four times as many sites as gallium-67 scintigraphy.

Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET/CT systematically reveals greater disease burden than conventional evaluation in PCM, reclassifying most patients toward higher severity with direct implications for treatment duration and follow-up. Where available, it should be considered an important complementary modality for initial disease assessment.

与常规分期相比,FDG-PET/CT对副球孢子菌病多器官累及的检测效果更好。
背景:副球孢子菌病(PCM)是一种被忽视的系统性真菌病,准确的分期至关重要,但传统方法具有挑战性。本研究将18F-FDG PET/CT与PCM分期的标准评估进行比较,并评估其对疾病严重程度分级的影响。方法:34例确诊PCM (treatment-naïve或疑似治疗失败)患者行常规分期及全身18F-FDG PET/CT检查。疾病严重程度分为轻度、中度和重度。对PET/CT图像进行定性和定量分析(SUVmax, TMLV, TLG)。结果:PET/CT检测到的病变数量是常规评估的两倍多(150 vs 62;平均每位患者4.4±1.6 vs 1.8±0.9),在淋巴结、肺和肾上腺受累方面具有统计学上的显著优势(McNemar试验,p < 0.05)。PET/CT将97%的患者重新分类为多灶性,而传统分期为59%,并且产生了明显的单向向更高严重程度的转变-被分类为严重的比例从70.6%增加到91.2% (p = 0.016)。疑似治疗失败患者TMLV、TLG明显低于treatment-naïve患者(p < 0.05)。定量PET参数与血清学滴度和炎症标志物相关(p < 0.05), PET/CT检测到的位点是镓-67显像的4倍。结论:18F-FDG PET/CT系统地揭示了PCM患者比常规评估更大的疾病负担,将大多数患者重新分类为更高的严重程度,直接影响治疗时间和随访。在可行的情况下,应将其视为初步疾病评估的重要补充方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书