Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Current Opinion in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-20 DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000001107
Monika Klírová, Andrej Stančák, Tomáš Novák, Odile A van den Heuvel
{"title":"Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder.","authors":"Monika Klírová, Andrej Stančák, Tomáš Novák, Odile A van den Heuvel","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and its modifications have emerged as promising interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although growing evidence supports the safety and clinical efficacy of rTMS, substantial heterogeneity in study designs and stimulation protocols continues to hinder the development of uniform, consensus-based guidelines.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Large-scale clinical trials capable of definitively establishing the effectiveness of existing rTMS protocols are still lacking. However, available findings from smaller randomized controlled trials and (network) meta-analyses suggest moderate efficacy for various rTMS targets and protocols. Accelerated protocols may shorten time to response, though comparative evidence of their efficacy remains limited. In the absence of clear clinical predictors, research is increasingly focused on personalized treatment protocols and biomarker-informed prediction of response. Also, integrated treatment approaches, with accumulating evidence supporting the combination of rTMS with psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy, seem promising.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>rTMS shows promise as an adjunctive treatment for OCD. Large, well designed clinical trials are required to establish the most effective target and stimulation parameters and to verify long-term outcomes. Personalized targeting guided by neural predictors, as well as the integration of rTMS into broader therapeutic strategies, may enhance treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"364-374"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13566475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000001107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and its modifications have emerged as promising interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although growing evidence supports the safety and clinical efficacy of rTMS, substantial heterogeneity in study designs and stimulation protocols continues to hinder the development of uniform, consensus-based guidelines.

Recent findings: Large-scale clinical trials capable of definitively establishing the effectiveness of existing rTMS protocols are still lacking. However, available findings from smaller randomized controlled trials and (network) meta-analyses suggest moderate efficacy for various rTMS targets and protocols. Accelerated protocols may shorten time to response, though comparative evidence of their efficacy remains limited. In the absence of clear clinical predictors, research is increasingly focused on personalized treatment protocols and biomarker-informed prediction of response. Also, integrated treatment approaches, with accumulating evidence supporting the combination of rTMS with psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy, seem promising.

Summary: rTMS shows promise as an adjunctive treatment for OCD. Large, well designed clinical trials are required to establish the most effective target and stimulation parameters and to verify long-term outcomes. Personalized targeting guided by neural predictors, as well as the integration of rTMS into broader therapeutic strategies, may enhance treatment efficacy.

反复经颅磁刺激治疗强迫症。
回顾目的:重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)及其改进已成为治疗强迫症(OCD)的有前途的干预措施。尽管越来越多的证据支持rTMS的安全性和临床疗效,但研究设计和刺激方案的巨大异质性仍然阻碍了统一的、基于共识的指南的发展。近期发现:目前仍缺乏能够确定现有rTMS方案有效性的大规模临床试验。然而,来自较小的随机对照试验和(网络)荟萃分析的现有结果表明,对各种rTMS靶点和方案的疗效中等。加速方案可能缩短反应时间,尽管其有效性的比较证据仍然有限。在缺乏明确的临床预测因素的情况下,研究越来越多地集中在个性化治疗方案和生物标志物预测反应上。此外,综合治疗方法,越来越多的证据支持rTMS与心理治疗或药物治疗相结合,似乎很有希望。摘要:rTMS有望作为强迫症的辅助治疗。需要大规模、设计良好的临床试验来确定最有效的靶点和刺激参数,并验证长期结果。由神经预测因子引导的个性化靶向,以及rTMS与更广泛的治疗策略的整合,可能会提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书