Social Deprivation as a Driver of Disparities in Arthroplasty: A Contemporary Review.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Rimel N Mwamba, Shannon Stover, Anna Lavernia, Rachel Bergman, Linda Suleiman
{"title":"Social Deprivation as a Driver of Disparities in Arthroplasty: A Contemporary Review.","authors":"Rimel N Mwamba, Shannon Stover, Anna Lavernia, Rachel Bergman, Linda Suleiman","doi":"10.1007/s12178-026-10046-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>While social determinants of health are known to contribute to disparities in orthopaedic care, associations between social deprivation and total joint arthroplasty (TJA) outcomes remain unclear. This review assessed the relationship between social deprivation and multiple aspects of total joint arthroplasty, including access to care, early postoperative outcomes, resource utilization, and patient-reported functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have increasingly used composite deprivation indices including the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), Social Deprivation Index (SDI), and Distressed Communities Index (DCI) to examine disparities in TJA care. Higher levels of social deprivation were consistently associated with reduced arthroplasty utilization, increased early postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, higher costs, and greater likelihood of non-home discharge. Associations with emergency department use were frequent, whereas findings related to readmissions were mixed. Relationships between deprivation and patient-reported outcomes were less consistent. Across multiple studies, deprivation was not uniformly associated with failure to achieve clinically meaningful improvement but was more frequently linked to failure to achieve patient-acceptable symptom states and challenges in sustaining functional recovery. Social deprivation is an important determinant of access, perioperative outcomes, and healthcare utilization following TJA, with ADI demonstrating the most consistent association. Although socially deprived patients generally achieve meaningful postoperative improvement, they are less likely to reach optimal recovery thresholds. Incorporating deprivation measures into perioperative planning may help identify patients who would benefit from targeted interventions. Future studies should standardize index use and evaluate strategies to reduce socioeconomic disparities in arthroplasty outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13280108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-026-10046-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: While social determinants of health are known to contribute to disparities in orthopaedic care, associations between social deprivation and total joint arthroplasty (TJA) outcomes remain unclear. This review assessed the relationship between social deprivation and multiple aspects of total joint arthroplasty, including access to care, early postoperative outcomes, resource utilization, and patient-reported functional recovery.

Recent findings: Recent studies have increasingly used composite deprivation indices including the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), Social Deprivation Index (SDI), and Distressed Communities Index (DCI) to examine disparities in TJA care. Higher levels of social deprivation were consistently associated with reduced arthroplasty utilization, increased early postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, higher costs, and greater likelihood of non-home discharge. Associations with emergency department use were frequent, whereas findings related to readmissions were mixed. Relationships between deprivation and patient-reported outcomes were less consistent. Across multiple studies, deprivation was not uniformly associated with failure to achieve clinically meaningful improvement but was more frequently linked to failure to achieve patient-acceptable symptom states and challenges in sustaining functional recovery. Social deprivation is an important determinant of access, perioperative outcomes, and healthcare utilization following TJA, with ADI demonstrating the most consistent association. Although socially deprived patients generally achieve meaningful postoperative improvement, they are less likely to reach optimal recovery thresholds. Incorporating deprivation measures into perioperative planning may help identify patients who would benefit from targeted interventions. Future studies should standardize index use and evaluate strategies to reduce socioeconomic disparities in arthroplasty outcomes.

社会剥夺作为关节置换术差异的驱动因素:当代综述。
综述目的:虽然已知健康的社会决定因素会导致骨科护理的差异,但社会剥夺与全关节置换术(TJA)结果之间的关系尚不清楚。本综述评估了社会剥夺与全关节置换术多个方面之间的关系,包括获得护理、术后早期结果、资源利用和患者报告的功能恢复。最近的研究发现:近年来,越来越多的研究使用包括区域剥夺指数(ADI)、社会脆弱性指数(SVI)、社会剥夺指数(SDI)和贫困社区指数(DCI)在内的综合剥夺指数来检查TJA护理的差异。较高的社会剥夺水平始终与关节置换术使用率降低、术后早期并发症增加、住院时间更长、费用更高以及非家庭出院的可能性更大相关。与急诊科使用的关联是常见的,而与再入院相关的发现则是混合的。剥夺与患者报告的结果之间的关系不太一致。在多项研究中,剥夺与未能实现临床有意义的改善并不一致相关,但更常见的是与未能实现患者可接受的症状状态和维持功能恢复的挑战相关。社会剥夺是TJA术后可及性、围手术期结果和医疗保健利用的重要决定因素,其中ADI表现出最一致的关联。虽然社会剥夺患者通常能实现有意义的术后改善,但他们不太可能达到最佳恢复阈值。将剥夺措施纳入围手术期计划可能有助于确定将从有针对性的干预中受益的患者。未来的研究应该标准化指标的使用和评估策略,以减少关节置换术结果的社会经济差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most significant recent developments in the field of musculoskeletal medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by expert world-renowned authors, the journal aims to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of musculoskeletal-related conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as rehabilitation of the knee and hip, sports medicine, trauma, pediatrics, health policy, customization in arthroplasty, and rheumatology. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 20 diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书