Production of Protein Hydrolysates and Bioactive Peptides From Lablab purpureus and Macrotyloma uniflorum via Optimized Extraction and Proteolysis Protocols
{"title":"Production of Protein Hydrolysates and Bioactive Peptides From Lablab purpureus and Macrotyloma uniflorum via Optimized Extraction and Proteolysis Protocols","authors":"Chitra Yadav, Pooja Yadav, Abhishek Joshi, Jaya Arora","doi":"10.1002/elps.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The rising global demand for sustainable, plant-based protein sources necessitates the exploration of underutilized legumes with high nutritional potential. This study systematically evaluates and compares five protein extraction techniques—ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), alkaline extraction–acid precipitation, phosphate buffer with TCA-acetone, TCA-acetone alone, and micellization—applied to <i>Lablab purpureus</i> and <i>Macrotyloma uniflorum</i>, two resilient and underexploited pulse crops. Protein recovery and yield were quantified for each method to identify the most efficient extraction approach. Among the tested methods, ultrasound-assisted extraction demonstrated superior performance in both legumes, with maximum protein yields of 84.02% for <i>L. purpureus</i> and 78.4% for <i>M. uniflorum</i> under optimized conditions (40% power, 10–15 min). Alkaline-acid precipitation resulted in the highest recovery (88.4%) but comparatively lower yields, indicating significant protein loss during isoelectric precipitation. Traditional precipitation techniques using TCA-acetone and phosphate buffer showed limited effectiveness, while micellization produced the lowest recovery and yield in both species. Importantly, the study reveals species-specific responses to extraction conditions, with <i>L. purpureus</i> consistently exhibiting higher extractability than <i>M. uniflorum</i>, likely due to differences in seed microstructure and protein distribution. These findings underscore the need for pulse-specific optimisation strategies rather than universal extraction protocols. The outcomes pave the way for their application in food, nutraceutical, and feed industries, contributing to sustainable protein innovation and improved utilisation of climate-resilient crops. Future work should focus on the structural, functional, and bioactive characterisation of the extracted proteins to enable targeted formulation in diverse food systems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":"47 9","pages":"881-893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elps.70125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rising global demand for sustainable, plant-based protein sources necessitates the exploration of underutilized legumes with high nutritional potential. This study systematically evaluates and compares five protein extraction techniques—ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), alkaline extraction–acid precipitation, phosphate buffer with TCA-acetone, TCA-acetone alone, and micellization—applied to Lablab purpureus and Macrotyloma uniflorum, two resilient and underexploited pulse crops. Protein recovery and yield were quantified for each method to identify the most efficient extraction approach. Among the tested methods, ultrasound-assisted extraction demonstrated superior performance in both legumes, with maximum protein yields of 84.02% for L. purpureus and 78.4% for M. uniflorum under optimized conditions (40% power, 10–15 min). Alkaline-acid precipitation resulted in the highest recovery (88.4%) but comparatively lower yields, indicating significant protein loss during isoelectric precipitation. Traditional precipitation techniques using TCA-acetone and phosphate buffer showed limited effectiveness, while micellization produced the lowest recovery and yield in both species. Importantly, the study reveals species-specific responses to extraction conditions, with L. purpureus consistently exhibiting higher extractability than M. uniflorum, likely due to differences in seed microstructure and protein distribution. These findings underscore the need for pulse-specific optimisation strategies rather than universal extraction protocols. The outcomes pave the way for their application in food, nutraceutical, and feed industries, contributing to sustainable protein innovation and improved utilisation of climate-resilient crops. Future work should focus on the structural, functional, and bioactive characterisation of the extracted proteins to enable targeted formulation in diverse food systems.
期刊介绍:
ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.).
Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences.
Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases.
Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered.
Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics:
• Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry
• Single cell and subcellular analysis
• Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS)
• Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing)
• Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation
• Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis
• Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.