Production of Protein Hydrolysates and Bioactive Peptides From Lablab purpureus and Macrotyloma uniflorum via Optimized Extraction and Proteolysis Protocols

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
ELECTROPHORESIS Pub Date : 2026-09-14 Epub Date: 2026-06-19 DOI:10.1002/elps.70125
Chitra Yadav, Pooja Yadav, Abhishek Joshi, Jaya Arora
{"title":"Production of Protein Hydrolysates and Bioactive Peptides From Lablab purpureus and Macrotyloma uniflorum via Optimized Extraction and Proteolysis Protocols","authors":"Chitra Yadav,&nbsp;Pooja Yadav,&nbsp;Abhishek Joshi,&nbsp;Jaya Arora","doi":"10.1002/elps.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The rising global demand for sustainable, plant-based protein sources necessitates the exploration of underutilized legumes with high nutritional potential. This study systematically evaluates and compares five protein extraction techniques—ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), alkaline extraction–acid precipitation, phosphate buffer with TCA-acetone, TCA-acetone alone, and micellization—applied to <i>Lablab purpureus</i> and <i>Macrotyloma uniflorum</i>, two resilient and underexploited pulse crops. Protein recovery and yield were quantified for each method to identify the most efficient extraction approach. Among the tested methods, ultrasound-assisted extraction demonstrated superior performance in both legumes, with maximum protein yields of 84.02% for <i>L. purpureus</i> and 78.4% for <i>M. uniflorum</i> under optimized conditions (40% power, 10–15 min). Alkaline-acid precipitation resulted in the highest recovery (88.4%) but comparatively lower yields, indicating significant protein loss during isoelectric precipitation. Traditional precipitation techniques using TCA-acetone and phosphate buffer showed limited effectiveness, while micellization produced the lowest recovery and yield in both species. Importantly, the study reveals species-specific responses to extraction conditions, with <i>L. purpureus</i> consistently exhibiting higher extractability than <i>M. uniflorum</i>, likely due to differences in seed microstructure and protein distribution. These findings underscore the need for pulse-specific optimisation strategies rather than universal extraction protocols. The outcomes pave the way for their application in food, nutraceutical, and feed industries, contributing to sustainable protein innovation and improved utilisation of climate-resilient crops. Future work should focus on the structural, functional, and bioactive characterisation of the extracted proteins to enable targeted formulation in diverse food systems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":"47 9","pages":"881-893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elps.70125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising global demand for sustainable, plant-based protein sources necessitates the exploration of underutilized legumes with high nutritional potential. This study systematically evaluates and compares five protein extraction techniques—ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), alkaline extraction–acid precipitation, phosphate buffer with TCA-acetone, TCA-acetone alone, and micellization—applied to Lablab purpureus and Macrotyloma uniflorum, two resilient and underexploited pulse crops. Protein recovery and yield were quantified for each method to identify the most efficient extraction approach. Among the tested methods, ultrasound-assisted extraction demonstrated superior performance in both legumes, with maximum protein yields of 84.02% for L. purpureus and 78.4% for M. uniflorum under optimized conditions (40% power, 10–15 min). Alkaline-acid precipitation resulted in the highest recovery (88.4%) but comparatively lower yields, indicating significant protein loss during isoelectric precipitation. Traditional precipitation techniques using TCA-acetone and phosphate buffer showed limited effectiveness, while micellization produced the lowest recovery and yield in both species. Importantly, the study reveals species-specific responses to extraction conditions, with L. purpureus consistently exhibiting higher extractability than M. uniflorum, likely due to differences in seed microstructure and protein distribution. These findings underscore the need for pulse-specific optimisation strategies rather than universal extraction protocols. The outcomes pave the way for their application in food, nutraceutical, and feed industries, contributing to sustainable protein innovation and improved utilisation of climate-resilient crops. Future work should focus on the structural, functional, and bioactive characterisation of the extracted proteins to enable targeted formulation in diverse food systems.

优化提取和蛋白水解工艺制备紫癜和单花巨瘤蛋白水解物和生物活性肽。
全球对可持续的植物性蛋白质来源的需求不断增长,因此有必要探索具有高营养潜力的未充分利用的豆类。本研究系统评价和比较了超声辅助提取(UAE)、碱性提取-酸沉淀、磷酸缓冲与tca -丙酮、单独使用tca -丙酮、胶束法等5种蛋白质提取技术在紫花实验室(Lablab purpureus)和uniflorum (Macrotyloma uniflorum)这两种适应性强且开发不足的脉冲作物中的应用。量化每种方法的蛋白质回收率和收率,以确定最有效的提取方法。在超声辅助提取条件下(40%功率,10-15 min),两种豆科植物的蛋白提取率最高,分别为84.02%和78.4%。碱-酸沉淀的回收率最高(88.4%),但产量相对较低,说明等电沉淀过程中蛋白质损失较大。使用tca -丙酮和磷酸盐缓冲液的传统沉淀技术效果有限,而胶束法的回收率和产量最低。重要的是,该研究揭示了物种对提取条件的特异性反应,紫红色乳杆菌的提取率始终高于单花乳杆菌,这可能是由于种子微观结构和蛋白质分布的差异。这些发现强调了对特定脉冲优化策略的需求,而不是通用的提取协议。这些成果为其在食品、营养保健和饲料行业的应用铺平了道路,有助于可持续蛋白质创新和提高对气候适应型作物的利用。未来的工作应该集中在提取蛋白质的结构、功能和生物活性特征上,以便在不同的食物系统中进行有针对性的配方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ELECTROPHORESIS
ELECTROPHORESIS 生物-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.). Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences. Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases. Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered. Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics: • Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry • Single cell and subcellular analysis • Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS) • Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing) • Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation • Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis • Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书