Automatic metabolic breast cancer staging using [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT: comparison with nuclear medicine physician-based and clinical staging.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Cláudia Santos Constantino, Carla Oliveira, Francisco P M Oliveira, Inês Moreira, Andrea DeCensi, Susana Vinga, Durval C Costa
{"title":"Automatic metabolic breast cancer staging using [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT: comparison with nuclear medicine physician-based and clinical staging.","authors":"Cláudia Santos Constantino, Carla Oliveira, Francisco P M Oliveira, Inês Moreira, Andrea DeCensi, Susana Vinga, Durval C Costa","doi":"10.1007/s00259-026-08005-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate a deep-learning (DL)-based framework to automatically perform breast cancer (BC) metabolic staging on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT, and to assess agreement among DL-based, nuclear medicine (NM) physician-based, and clinical staging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 403 histologically confirmed BC patients who underwent whole-body staging [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT were retrospectively included. All [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG avid lesions suspected of malignancy were segmented by an NM physician and classified into four key tumor regions: primary tumor (pT), regional axillary lymph nodes (ALN), extra-axillary locoregional nodes (extra-ALN), and distant metastases (dM). Data were split into training (n = 303) and testing (n = 100) sets using a stratified approach. Class-specific DL segmentation networks were developed. A post-processing pipeline was implemented to derive metabolic TNM staging from the DL-based segmentation. Using NM-based and clinical staging segmentation as reference, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were computed for T, N, and M. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient (DC) and lesion detection (LD) metrics. NM-based metabolic staging was also compared with clinical staging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DL-based staging showed concordance with NM-based/clinical staging of 75/62%, 87/74%, and 83/82% for T, N, and M, respectively. For N3 (presence of extra-ALN) and M1 (presence of dM), where [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT is particularly relevant, sensitivity/specificity of DL-based (NM-based reference) were 0.86/0.96, and 0.97/0.78, respectively. Segmentation performance was good to excellent for pT, ALN, and dM (median DC ≥ 0.83 and LD ≥ 0.78), and moderate for extra-ALN (median DC = 0.63 and LD ≥ 0.71). NM-based metabolic staging agreed with clinical staging in 63%, 80%, and 99% of cases for T, N, and M, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although expert supervision remains essential, the developed DL-based framework demonstrates potential as a supportive tool for metabolic staging in BC patients, facilitating a workflow-efficient [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT-based staging assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"6339-6350"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13525970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08005-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate a deep-learning (DL)-based framework to automatically perform breast cancer (BC) metabolic staging on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT, and to assess agreement among DL-based, nuclear medicine (NM) physician-based, and clinical staging.

Methods: A total of 403 histologically confirmed BC patients who underwent whole-body staging [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT were retrospectively included. All [18F]FDG avid lesions suspected of malignancy were segmented by an NM physician and classified into four key tumor regions: primary tumor (pT), regional axillary lymph nodes (ALN), extra-axillary locoregional nodes (extra-ALN), and distant metastases (dM). Data were split into training (n = 303) and testing (n = 100) sets using a stratified approach. Class-specific DL segmentation networks were developed. A post-processing pipeline was implemented to derive metabolic TNM staging from the DL-based segmentation. Using NM-based and clinical staging segmentation as reference, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were computed for T, N, and M. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient (DC) and lesion detection (LD) metrics. NM-based metabolic staging was also compared with clinical staging.

Results: DL-based staging showed concordance with NM-based/clinical staging of 75/62%, 87/74%, and 83/82% for T, N, and M, respectively. For N3 (presence of extra-ALN) and M1 (presence of dM), where [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT is particularly relevant, sensitivity/specificity of DL-based (NM-based reference) were 0.86/0.96, and 0.97/0.78, respectively. Segmentation performance was good to excellent for pT, ALN, and dM (median DC ≥ 0.83 and LD ≥ 0.78), and moderate for extra-ALN (median DC = 0.63 and LD ≥ 0.71). NM-based metabolic staging agreed with clinical staging in 63%, 80%, and 99% of cases for T, N, and M, respectively.

Conclusion: Although expert supervision remains essential, the developed DL-based framework demonstrates potential as a supportive tool for metabolic staging in BC patients, facilitating a workflow-efficient [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT-based staging assessment.

[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT自动代谢乳腺癌分期:核医学医师分期与临床分期的比较。
目的:本研究旨在评估基于深度学习(DL)的框架在[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT上自动进行乳腺癌(BC)代谢分期,并评估基于深度学习(DL)、核医学(NM)医师和临床分期之间的一致性。方法:回顾性分析403例经组织学证实的BC患者,并行全身分期[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT。所有[18F]疑似恶性的FDG病变均由NM医师进行分割,并将其分为四个关键肿瘤区域:原发肿瘤(pT)、区域腋窝淋巴结(ALN)、腋窝外局部淋巴结(extra-ALN)和远处转移瘤(dM)。采用分层方法将数据分为训练集(n = 303)和测试集(n = 100)。开发了特定类别的深度学习分割网络。实现了一个后处理管道,从基于dl的分割中导出代谢TNM分期。以nm为基础和临床分期分割为参考,计算T、N和m的准确性、敏感性和特异性。使用Dice系数(DC)和病变检测(LD)指标评估分割性能。并将基于纳米颗粒的代谢分期与临床分期进行比较。结果:基于dl的分期与基于nm /临床分期的T、N、M的一致性分别为75/62%、87/74%和83/82%。对于N3(存在额外aln)和M1(存在dM),其中[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT特别相关,基于dl(基于nm的参考)的敏感性/特异性分别为0.86/0.96和0.97/0.78。pT、ALN和dM的分割性能为良好至优异(中位DC≥0.83,LD≥0.78),而额外ALN的分割性能为中等(中位DC = 0.63, LD≥0.71)。在T、N和M病例中,基于nm的代谢分期分别有63%、80%和99%符合临床分期。结论:尽管专家监督仍然是必要的,但基于dl的框架显示了作为BC患者代谢分期的支持工具的潜力,促进了高效的工作流程[¹⁸F]FDG PET/ ct分期评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书