Treatment outcomes in new daily persistent headache in children and adolescents.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-19 DOI:10.1177/03331024261426562
Nassim Abuhalaweh, Amy A Gelfand, Morgan Evans, Blanca Marquez de Prado, Carlyn Patterson Gentile, Nichelle Raj, Andrew D Hershey, Christina L Szperka
{"title":"Treatment outcomes in new daily persistent headache in children and adolescents.","authors":"Nassim Abuhalaweh, Amy A Gelfand, Morgan Evans, Blanca Marquez de Prado, Carlyn Patterson Gentile, Nichelle Raj, Andrew D Hershey, Christina L Szperka","doi":"10.1177/03331024261426562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNew daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a primary headache disorder that often presents in adolescence. Presently, there is no effective treatment for NDPH and a paucity of clinical trials exploring therapeutic options. In this study, we explored the relative benefit of currently used treatments to help inform future trials and clinical decision-making.MethodsIn this retrospective chart review study, patients aged 5-17 years with abrupt onset continuous headache and headache duration of at least one month (constituting NDPH or probable NDPH) were identified based on responses to a Headache Questionnaire in child neurology clinic and confirmed with chart review. We included all treatments (transitional therapy, preventive supplement, preventive medication and preventive non-medication therapy) started during continuous headache until both break in continuous headache and sustained improvement in headache were achieved. For treatments tried by at least 10 patients and for the first treatment tried in each category, we calculated proportions of any documented benefit, including \"Significant\" (≥30% improvement lasting ≥4 weeks) and \"Some improvement\" (all other improvement) and proportions of negative outcome (those with worsened headaches or side effects warranting discontinuation), as well as median time to treatment. We used multivariable regression modeling to examine for factors associated with headache outcomes. Treatments may have overlapped.ResultsOf the 165 patients, the largest proportion of patients experienced benefit with the first transitional therapy (62/108; 57%), which was usually intravenous medications ± oral corticosteroids. The first supplement tried, usually riboflavin ± magnesium, offered benefit in (36/118; 31%), with few negative outcomes (3/118; 3%). The first prescription preventive tried, usually amitriptyline or topiramate, offered similar benefit (37/106; 35%) as the first supplement, but with more negative outcomes (25/106; 24%). Despite being tried after oral preventives, onabotulinumtoxinA injections offered benefit to the largest proportion of patients (14/20; 70%) without negative outcomes (0%). Overall, the time to first therapy was weeks to months into continuous headache: shortest for transitional therapies (median = 49 days, interquartile range = 17-92 days), and longest for non-medication therapies (median = 144 days, interquartile range = 61-381 days). Increased time to any first treatment was associated with decreased odds of headache improvement at one-year follow-up (odds ratio = 0.823, 95% confidence interval = 0.715-0.946, <i>p</i> = 0.006).ConclusionsChildren and adolescents with new onset continuous headache experience treatment delays which are associated with worse outcomes. Clinicians should consider use of transitional therapies in combination with preventive treatments as early as possible. Prospective natural history studies and trials are needed to improve treatment outcomes for pediatric patients with NDPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"46 6","pages":"3331024261426562"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024261426562","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundNew daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a primary headache disorder that often presents in adolescence. Presently, there is no effective treatment for NDPH and a paucity of clinical trials exploring therapeutic options. In this study, we explored the relative benefit of currently used treatments to help inform future trials and clinical decision-making.MethodsIn this retrospective chart review study, patients aged 5-17 years with abrupt onset continuous headache and headache duration of at least one month (constituting NDPH or probable NDPH) were identified based on responses to a Headache Questionnaire in child neurology clinic and confirmed with chart review. We included all treatments (transitional therapy, preventive supplement, preventive medication and preventive non-medication therapy) started during continuous headache until both break in continuous headache and sustained improvement in headache were achieved. For treatments tried by at least 10 patients and for the first treatment tried in each category, we calculated proportions of any documented benefit, including "Significant" (≥30% improvement lasting ≥4 weeks) and "Some improvement" (all other improvement) and proportions of negative outcome (those with worsened headaches or side effects warranting discontinuation), as well as median time to treatment. We used multivariable regression modeling to examine for factors associated with headache outcomes. Treatments may have overlapped.ResultsOf the 165 patients, the largest proportion of patients experienced benefit with the first transitional therapy (62/108; 57%), which was usually intravenous medications ± oral corticosteroids. The first supplement tried, usually riboflavin ± magnesium, offered benefit in (36/118; 31%), with few negative outcomes (3/118; 3%). The first prescription preventive tried, usually amitriptyline or topiramate, offered similar benefit (37/106; 35%) as the first supplement, but with more negative outcomes (25/106; 24%). Despite being tried after oral preventives, onabotulinumtoxinA injections offered benefit to the largest proportion of patients (14/20; 70%) without negative outcomes (0%). Overall, the time to first therapy was weeks to months into continuous headache: shortest for transitional therapies (median = 49 days, interquartile range = 17-92 days), and longest for non-medication therapies (median = 144 days, interquartile range = 61-381 days). Increased time to any first treatment was associated with decreased odds of headache improvement at one-year follow-up (odds ratio = 0.823, 95% confidence interval = 0.715-0.946, p = 0.006).ConclusionsChildren and adolescents with new onset continuous headache experience treatment delays which are associated with worse outcomes. Clinicians should consider use of transitional therapies in combination with preventive treatments as early as possible. Prospective natural history studies and trials are needed to improve treatment outcomes for pediatric patients with NDPH.

儿童和青少年新发每日持续性头痛的治疗结果
背景:新发持续性头痛(NDPH)是一种常见于青春期的原发性头痛疾病。目前,没有有效的治疗NDPH和缺乏临床试验探索治疗方案。在这项研究中,我们探讨了目前使用的治疗方法的相对益处,以帮助告知未来的试验和临床决策。方法回顾性图表回顾研究,对5 ~ 17岁儿童神经内科门诊的头痛问卷进行分析,确定患者为突发性持续性头痛,头痛持续时间至少1个月(构成NDPH或可能为NDPH),并通过图表回顾加以证实。我们纳入了在持续头痛期间开始的所有治疗(过渡性治疗、预防性补充、预防性药物治疗和预防性非药物治疗),直到持续头痛中断和头痛持续改善。对于至少10名患者尝试的治疗,以及每个类别中首次尝试的治疗,我们计算了任何记录的获益的比例,包括“显著”(≥30%的改善持续≥4周)和“一些改善”(所有其他改善)和负面结果的比例(头痛恶化或副作用需要停药),以及治疗的中位时间。我们使用多变量回归模型来检查与头痛结果相关的因素。治疗可能有重叠。结果165例患者中,第一次过渡治疗获益的比例最大(62/108,57%),通常为静脉注射药物±口服糖皮质激素。第一次尝试的补充剂,通常是核黄素±镁,提供了益处(36/118;31%),很少有负面结果(3/118;3%)。第一个预防性处方,通常是阿米替林或托吡酯,提供了与第一个补充剂相似的益处(37/106;35%),但有更多的负面结果(25/106;24%)。尽管在口服预防措施之后进行了尝试,但单肉毒杆菌毒素注射对最大比例的患者(14/20;70%)有益处,没有负面结果(0%)。总体而言,首次治疗持续头痛的时间为几周到几个月:过渡治疗最短(中位数= 49天,四分位数范围= 17-92天),非药物治疗最长(中位数= 144天,四分位数范围= 61-381天)。在一年随访中,任何首次治疗时间的增加与头痛改善的几率降低相关(优势比= 0.823,95%可信区间= 0.715-0.946,p = 0.006)。结论儿童和青少年新发持续性头痛患者治疗延迟,预后较差。临床医生应尽早考虑将过渡性治疗与预防性治疗结合使用。需要前瞻性的自然史研究和试验来改善小儿NDPH患者的治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书