Feasibility and safety of coronary catheter rolling technique (Jahanzeb technique) for radial artery catheterization on arterial perforation and radial artery patency.

Wahab Anwar, Ali Karim, Mubeena Javed, Poonam Kumari, Daya Kumari, F N U Karishma, Muhammad Salman, Hesham Naeem, Abida Perveen, Jahanzeb Malik
{"title":"Feasibility and safety of coronary catheter rolling technique (Jahanzeb technique) for radial artery catheterization on arterial perforation and radial artery patency.","authors":"Wahab Anwar, Ali Karim, Mubeena Javed, Poonam Kumari, Daya Kumari, F N U Karishma, Muhammad Salman, Hesham Naeem, Abida Perveen, Jahanzeb Malik","doi":"10.1186/s43044-026-00751-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transradial access is widely used for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, complications such as radial artery spasm, perforation, and occlusion remain clinically relevant. Jahanzeb's Coronary Catheter Rolling Technique (JCRT) is a novel method designed to improve catheter navigation and reduce vascular trauma.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes of JCRT compared with the conventional radial catheterization technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, non-randomized comparative study 4,697 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography or PCI via radial access were included. Patients were allocated to JCRT (n = 1,519) or the standard technique (n = 3,178). Primary endpoints were arterial perforation and radial artery occlusion. Secondary endpoints included major bleeding, radial artery spasm, thrombosis, and patient and physician satisfaction. Outcomes were analyzed using odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and multivariable logistic regression was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>JCRT was associated with a significantly lower overall complication rate (7.6% vs. 11.0%; OR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.92; p = 0.037). Significant reductions were observed in major bleeding (4.3% vs. 7.1%; OR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.81; p = 0.024), radial artery spasm (2.1% vs. 4.9%; OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.63; p = 0.011), arterial perforation (1.6% vs. 3.8%; OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.71; p = 0.032), and radial artery occlusion (2.8% vs. 6.3%; OR: 0.43, 95% CI 0.29-0.63; p = 0.006). On multivariable analysis, JCRT remained associated with reduced complications after adjustment (adjusted OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.93; p = 0.021). Patient and physician satisfaction scores were significantly higher with JCRT (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>JCRT is a feasible and safe technique associated with reduced vascular complications and improved satisfaction. Further multicenter randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74993,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13280300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-026-00751-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transradial access is widely used for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, complications such as radial artery spasm, perforation, and occlusion remain clinically relevant. Jahanzeb's Coronary Catheter Rolling Technique (JCRT) is a novel method designed to improve catheter navigation and reduce vascular trauma.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes of JCRT compared with the conventional radial catheterization technique.

Methods: In this prospective, non-randomized comparative study 4,697 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography or PCI via radial access were included. Patients were allocated to JCRT (n = 1,519) or the standard technique (n = 3,178). Primary endpoints were arterial perforation and radial artery occlusion. Secondary endpoints included major bleeding, radial artery spasm, thrombosis, and patient and physician satisfaction. Outcomes were analyzed using odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and multivariable logistic regression was performed.

Results: JCRT was associated with a significantly lower overall complication rate (7.6% vs. 11.0%; OR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.92; p = 0.037). Significant reductions were observed in major bleeding (4.3% vs. 7.1%; OR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.81; p = 0.024), radial artery spasm (2.1% vs. 4.9%; OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.63; p = 0.011), arterial perforation (1.6% vs. 3.8%; OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.71; p = 0.032), and radial artery occlusion (2.8% vs. 6.3%; OR: 0.43, 95% CI 0.29-0.63; p = 0.006). On multivariable analysis, JCRT remained associated with reduced complications after adjustment (adjusted OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.93; p = 0.021). Patient and physician satisfaction scores were significantly higher with JCRT (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: JCRT is a feasible and safe technique associated with reduced vascular complications and improved satisfaction. Further multicenter randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

冠状动脉滚管技术(Jahanzeb技术)在动脉穿孔和桡动脉通畅桡动脉置管中的可行性和安全性。
背景:经桡动脉通路广泛应用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI);然而,并发症如桡动脉痉挛、穿孔和闭塞仍然具有临床意义。Jahanzeb冠状动脉导管滚动技术(JCRT)是一种改善导管导航和减少血管损伤的新方法。目的:评价JCRT与常规桡动脉置管技术的可行性、安全性及临床效果。方法:在这项前瞻性、非随机对照研究中,纳入了4,697例经桡动脉通路接受选择性冠状动脉造影或PCI的患者。患者被分配到JCRT组(n = 1519)或标准技术组(n = 3178)。主要终点为动脉穿孔和桡动脉闭塞。次要终点包括大出血、桡动脉痉挛、血栓形成以及患者和医生的满意度。结果采用比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)进行分析,并进行多变量logistic回归。结果:JCRT与较低的总并发症发生率相关(7.6% vs 11.0%; OR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.92; p = 0.037)。大出血(4.3% vs. 7.1%; OR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.81; p = 0.024)、桡动脉痉挛(2.1% vs. 4.9%; OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.63; p = 0.011)、动脉穿孔(1.6% vs. 3.8%; OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.71; p = 0.032)和桡动脉闭塞(2.8% vs. 6.3%; OR: 0.43, 95% CI 0.29-0.63; p = 0.006)的发生率显著降低。在多变量分析中,JCRT仍与调整后并发症减少相关(调整后OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.93; p = 0.021)。结论:JCRT是一种可行且安全的技术,可减少血管并发症,提高满意度。需要进一步的多中心随机研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书