Salutogenic Principles in Workplace Health Promotion Interventions: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.5
Journal of prevention (2022) Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-18 DOI:10.1007/s10935-026-00915-9
Sammy J S Wrede, Ines-Maria Gärtner, Achim Mortsiefer
{"title":"Salutogenic Principles in Workplace Health Promotion Interventions: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sammy J S Wrede, Ines-Maria Gärtner, Achim Mortsiefer","doi":"10.1007/s10935-026-00915-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While workplace health promotion has traditionally emphasized risk reduction, knowledge about the extent to which interventions incorporate health-promoting resources such as Sense of Coherence, Participation, Goal-Setting, Variability, and Empowerment is fragmented. This scoping review examined how these salutogenic principles are operationalized in behavioral workplace health promotion programs focused on primary prevention. A systematic search across five databases identified 128 intervention studies published between 2014 and 2024. Each program was assessed using a Salutogenesis-Score (0-5) reflecting the number of salutogenic principles integrated into its design and delivery. Overall, the incorporation of salutogenic principles was moderate. Empowerment, Variability, and Sense of Coherence were most frequently represented, whereas Participation and Goal-Setting appeared considerably less often. For instance, tailored interventions that included individualized counseling or self-management tools achieved high scores, with multi-component programs showing the strongest overall alignment. Although many programs contain elements that support health-promoting behavior, their potential to fully activate salutogenic mechanisms remains underused. Strengthening participatory approaches and personalized goal-setting may enhance employee agency, adaptability, and long-term engagement, thereby fostering more sustainable and empowering workplace health promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":73905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prevention (2022)","volume":" ","pages":"851-878"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13582129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prevention (2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-026-00915-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While workplace health promotion has traditionally emphasized risk reduction, knowledge about the extent to which interventions incorporate health-promoting resources such as Sense of Coherence, Participation, Goal-Setting, Variability, and Empowerment is fragmented. This scoping review examined how these salutogenic principles are operationalized in behavioral workplace health promotion programs focused on primary prevention. A systematic search across five databases identified 128 intervention studies published between 2014 and 2024. Each program was assessed using a Salutogenesis-Score (0-5) reflecting the number of salutogenic principles integrated into its design and delivery. Overall, the incorporation of salutogenic principles was moderate. Empowerment, Variability, and Sense of Coherence were most frequently represented, whereas Participation and Goal-Setting appeared considerably less often. For instance, tailored interventions that included individualized counseling or self-management tools achieved high scores, with multi-component programs showing the strongest overall alignment. Although many programs contain elements that support health-promoting behavior, their potential to fully activate salutogenic mechanisms remains underused. Strengthening participatory approaches and personalized goal-setting may enhance employee agency, adaptability, and long-term engagement, thereby fostering more sustainable and empowering workplace health promotion.

工作场所健康促进干预的有益原则:范围综述。
虽然工作场所健康促进传统上强调降低风险,但关于干预措施在多大程度上纳入健康促进资源(如一致性、参与感、目标设定、可变性和赋权)的知识是零散的。这一范围审查审查了这些有益健康的原则是如何在以一级预防为重点的行为工作场所健康促进计划中实施的。对五个数据库的系统搜索确定了2014年至2024年间发表的128项干预研究。每个项目都使用健康评分(0-5)进行评估,反映了其设计和交付中整合的健康原则的数量。总的来说,健康原则的纳入是适度的。授权、可变性和一致性是最常见的,而参与和目标设定出现的频率要低得多。例如,包括个性化咨询或自我管理工具在内的量身定制的干预措施获得了高分,多组件计划显示出最强的整体一致性。尽管许多项目包含支持健康促进行为的元素,但它们充分激活健康机制的潜力仍未得到充分利用。加强参与性方法和个性化的目标设定可以增强员工的能动性、适应性和长期参与,从而促进更可持续和更有能力的工作场所健康促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书