C H Ho, K F Cheng, I H W Cheung, M S Chi, O M Y Choi, W W S Ho, G K K Lau, R Lee, W M Lui, Y H Mak, K C Teo, A C O Tsang, C P Tsang, M Y Tse, J T F Zhuang, G K K Leung
{"title":"Functional outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy beyond 6 hours after acute ischaemic stroke.","authors":"C H Ho, K F Cheng, I H W Cheung, M S Chi, O M Y Choi, W W S Ho, G K K Lau, R Lee, W M Lui, Y H Mak, K C Teo, A C O Tsang, C P Tsang, M Y Tse, J T F Zhuang, G K K Leung","doi":"10.12809/hkmj2514653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) within 6 hours is the standard treatment for large vessel occlusion stroke. However, the benefit-to-risk ratio of MT becomes increasingly unfavourable in the extended 6- to 24-hour window; current guidelines recommend cerebral perfusion studies (CPS) for patient selection. Although recent trials of extended-window MT have shown promising results, challenges may arise in real-world implementation where CPS are not readily available. This single-centre retrospective review included patients who underwent extended-window MT with or without prior CPS in Hong Kong.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 480 patients who underwent MT at Queen Mary Hospital between January 2019 and January 2025. Primary outcomes were 3-month modified Rankin Scale, door-to-groin puncture time, recanalisation rate, procedural complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes included differences in 3-month functional status between patients who underwent MT with or without prior CPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 51 patients who underwent extended-window MT, 37 (72.5%) had anterior circulation stroke. The overall complication rate was 7.8%. Cerebral perfusion studies were performed to guide selection in 15 patients (40.5%) with anterior circulation strokes and were associated with a significantly higher rate of functional independence at 3 months compared with selection based on clinical judgement alone (66.7% vs 27.3%; P=0.018). Use of CPS was also associated with a longer door-to-puncture time (167 vs 89.5 min; P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cerebral perfusion studies improve patient selection for extended-window MT. Favourable functional outcomes were achieved in a substantial proportion of patients selected on the basis of clinical criteria alone. The study findings provide evidence supporting clinical service development to facilitate CPS adoption and extended-window MT in Hong Kong.</p>","PeriodicalId":48828,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"200-207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj2514653","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) within 6 hours is the standard treatment for large vessel occlusion stroke. However, the benefit-to-risk ratio of MT becomes increasingly unfavourable in the extended 6- to 24-hour window; current guidelines recommend cerebral perfusion studies (CPS) for patient selection. Although recent trials of extended-window MT have shown promising results, challenges may arise in real-world implementation where CPS are not readily available. This single-centre retrospective review included patients who underwent extended-window MT with or without prior CPS in Hong Kong.
Methods: This study included 480 patients who underwent MT at Queen Mary Hospital between January 2019 and January 2025. Primary outcomes were 3-month modified Rankin Scale, door-to-groin puncture time, recanalisation rate, procedural complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes included differences in 3-month functional status between patients who underwent MT with or without prior CPS.
Results: Among the 51 patients who underwent extended-window MT, 37 (72.5%) had anterior circulation stroke. The overall complication rate was 7.8%. Cerebral perfusion studies were performed to guide selection in 15 patients (40.5%) with anterior circulation strokes and were associated with a significantly higher rate of functional independence at 3 months compared with selection based on clinical judgement alone (66.7% vs 27.3%; P=0.018). Use of CPS was also associated with a longer door-to-puncture time (167 vs 89.5 min; P<0.001).
Conclusion: Cerebral perfusion studies improve patient selection for extended-window MT. Favourable functional outcomes were achieved in a substantial proportion of patients selected on the basis of clinical criteria alone. The study findings provide evidence supporting clinical service development to facilitate CPS adoption and extended-window MT in Hong Kong.
6小时内机械取栓(MT)是大血管闭塞性卒中的标准治疗方法。然而,在延长的6至24小时窗口内,MT的收益风险比变得越来越不利;目前的指南推荐脑灌注研究(CPS)来选择患者。尽管最近的扩展窗口MT试验显示出了有希望的结果,但在现实世界中,CPS不容易获得的情况下,可能会出现挑战。这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了在香港接受过或未接受过CPS的扩展窗口MT的患者。方法:本研究纳入了2019年1月至2025年1月在玛丽医院接受MT治疗的480例患者。主要结果为3个月改良Rankin量表、门至腹股沟穿刺时间、再通率、手术并发症和死亡率。次要结局包括有或没有既往CPS的MT患者3个月功能状态的差异。结果:51例行延长窗MT的患者中,37例(72.5%)发生前循环卒中。总并发症发生率为7.8%。对15例(40.5%)前循环卒中患者进行脑灌注研究指导选择,与单纯根据临床判断选择相比,3个月时功能独立性显著提高(66.7% vs 27.3%; P=0.018)。CPS的使用也与较长的门到穿刺时间相关(167分钟vs 89.5分钟);结论:脑灌注研究改善了延长窗口MT患者的选择。仅根据临床标准选择的患者中有相当一部分获得了良好的功能结果。研究结果为临床服务的发展提供证据,以促进香港采用CPS和扩展窗口MT。
期刊介绍:
The HKMJ is a Hong Kong-based, peer-reviewed, general medical journal which is circulated to 6000 readers, including all members of the HKMA and Fellows of the HKAM. The HKMJ publishes original research papers, review articles, medical practice papers, case reports, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, and letters to the Editor. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to clinical practice and research in all branches of medicine. The HKMJ welcomes manuscripts from authors, but usually solicits reviews. Proposals for review papers can be sent to the Managing Editor directly. Please refer to the contact information of the Editorial Office.