Do Internalizing Syndromes have Incremental Validity for External Criteria Above and Beyond Each Other?

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kerry L Kinney, Matthew C Morris, Katja Beesdo-Baum, Ashley L Watts
{"title":"Do Internalizing Syndromes have Incremental Validity for External Criteria Above and Beyond Each Other?","authors":"Kerry L Kinney, Matthew C Morris, Katja Beesdo-Baum, Ashley L Watts","doi":"10.1177/21677026261443518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given robust support for internalizing psychopathology as a broad construct, the field has shifted focus from its specific subcomponents to studying internalizing overall, leaving it unclear whether its components provide additional information. We investigated whether internalizing syndromes have incremental validity beyond each other in their associations with 22 external criteria (e.g., health, functioning) using the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions data, a representative adult sample (Wave 1, <i>N</i>=43,093). We extracted a five-factor model for 5 lower-order internalizing syndromes (generalized anxiety, major depression, social anxiety, specific phobia, panic). All were moderately correlated with each other and associated with external criteria. Adjusting for other internalizing syndromes, generalized anxiety, major depression, and panic syndromes demonstrated incremental validity, or unique associations with external criteria. Our findings suggest internalizing syndromes exhibit shared and unique features. Investigating both the internalizing spectrum and its more specific syndromes can offer deeper insights into psychopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13271574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026261443518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given robust support for internalizing psychopathology as a broad construct, the field has shifted focus from its specific subcomponents to studying internalizing overall, leaving it unclear whether its components provide additional information. We investigated whether internalizing syndromes have incremental validity beyond each other in their associations with 22 external criteria (e.g., health, functioning) using the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions data, a representative adult sample (Wave 1, N=43,093). We extracted a five-factor model for 5 lower-order internalizing syndromes (generalized anxiety, major depression, social anxiety, specific phobia, panic). All were moderately correlated with each other and associated with external criteria. Adjusting for other internalizing syndromes, generalized anxiety, major depression, and panic syndromes demonstrated incremental validity, or unique associations with external criteria. Our findings suggest internalizing syndromes exhibit shared and unique features. Investigating both the internalizing spectrum and its more specific syndromes can offer deeper insights into psychopathology.

内化证候对外部标准是否有递增效度?
鉴于将精神病理学内部化作为一个广泛的结构得到了强有力的支持,该领域已将重点从其特定的子成分转移到研究整体内部化,但其组成部分是否提供了额外的信息尚不清楚。我们使用代表性成人样本(Wave 1, N=43,093)的全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查数据,调查了内化综合征与22个外部标准(如健康、功能)之间的关联是否具有增量效度。我们提取了5种低阶内化综合征(广泛性焦虑、重度抑郁、社交焦虑、特定恐惧症、恐慌)的五因子模型。所有这些相互之间都适度相关,并与外部标准相关。调整其他内化综合征,广泛性焦虑,重度抑郁和恐慌综合征显示出递增的有效性,或与外部标准的独特关联。我们的研究结果表明,内化综合征表现出共同和独特的特征。调查内化谱及其更具体的综合症可以为精神病理学提供更深入的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书