Association Between Osimertinib Dose Reduction and Treatment Outcomes in First-Line EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: The Impact of Post-Progression Management.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Issei Oi, Kohei Fujita, Takuma Imakita, Mitsuhiro Tukino, Tetsuo Noguchi, Yuta Okada, Saiki Yoshimura, Naoki Fujimoto, Shogo Toyama, Atsuko Watanabe, Takanori Ito, Ryosuke Kaku, Osamu Kanai, Masatsugu Ohuchi, Kiminobu Tanizawa, Satoru Sawai, Tadashi Mio
{"title":"Association Between Osimertinib Dose Reduction and Treatment Outcomes in First-Line EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: The Impact of Post-Progression Management.","authors":"Issei Oi, Kohei Fujita, Takuma Imakita, Mitsuhiro Tukino, Tetsuo Noguchi, Yuta Okada, Saiki Yoshimura, Naoki Fujimoto, Shogo Toyama, Atsuko Watanabe, Takanori Ito, Ryosuke Kaku, Osamu Kanai, Masatsugu Ohuchi, Kiminobu Tanizawa, Satoru Sawai, Tadashi Mio","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osimertinib is the standard first-line treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of dose-reduction on survival and the role of post-progression management in real-world settings remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study on patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC who received first-line osimertinib between January 2018 and December 2023. Patients were classified into dose-reduced and full-dose groups. Primary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). The subsequent treatment after progression was also exploratively assessed to evaluate the impact of initial dose modification on the entire treatment sequence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 patients were analyzed, consisting of 61 patients in the full-dose group and 29 in the dose-reduction group. Median follow-up was 21.5 months (IQR 9.1-37.2). The dose-reduced group had significantly worse baseline performance status (PS) (PS 2-3: 37.9% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.014). Despite this, dose reduction showed no significant impact on TTF (adjusted HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.40-1.10, p = 0.11) or OS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.59-1.58, p = 0.89). Multivariate analysis revealed that transition to best supportive care (BSC) after progression, rather than initial dose reduction, was associated with OS (hazard ratio, 7.40; p < 0.0001). The proportions of patients receiving subsequent chemotherapy were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Osimertinib dose reduction in the first-line setting was not associated with inferior OS, suggesting that appropriate dose modification helps maintain PS. Transition to BSC after progression, rather than initial dose intensity, was associated with poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"17 12","pages":"e70328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13275180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osimertinib is the standard first-line treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of dose-reduction on survival and the role of post-progression management in real-world settings remain unclear.

Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study on patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC who received first-line osimertinib between January 2018 and December 2023. Patients were classified into dose-reduced and full-dose groups. Primary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). The subsequent treatment after progression was also exploratively assessed to evaluate the impact of initial dose modification on the entire treatment sequence.

Results: A total of 90 patients were analyzed, consisting of 61 patients in the full-dose group and 29 in the dose-reduction group. Median follow-up was 21.5 months (IQR 9.1-37.2). The dose-reduced group had significantly worse baseline performance status (PS) (PS 2-3: 37.9% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.014). Despite this, dose reduction showed no significant impact on TTF (adjusted HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.40-1.10, p = 0.11) or OS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.59-1.58, p = 0.89). Multivariate analysis revealed that transition to best supportive care (BSC) after progression, rather than initial dose reduction, was associated with OS (hazard ratio, 7.40; p < 0.0001). The proportions of patients receiving subsequent chemotherapy were comparable between the groups.

Conclusions: Osimertinib dose reduction in the first-line setting was not associated with inferior OS, suggesting that appropriate dose modification helps maintain PS. Transition to BSC after progression, rather than initial dose intensity, was associated with poor prognosis.

一线egfr突变晚期NSCLC中奥西替尼剂量减少与治疗结果的关系:进展后管理的影响
背景:奥西替尼是表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准一线治疗药物。然而,在现实环境中,剂量减少对生存的影响和进展后管理的作用仍不清楚。方法:我们对2018年1月至2023年12月期间接受一线奥西替尼治疗的egfr突变晚期NSCLC患者进行了一项多机构回顾性队列研究。将患者分为减剂量组和全剂量组。主要终点是治疗失败时间(TTF)和总生存期(OS)。进展后的后续治疗也进行探索性评估,以评估初始剂量调整对整个治疗顺序的影响。结果:共分析90例患者,其中全剂量组61例,减剂量组29例。中位随访时间为21.5个月(IQR为9.1 ~ 37.2)。剂量减少组的基线性能状态(PS)明显较差(PS 2-3: 37.9% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.014)。尽管如此,剂量减少对TTF(调整后危险度0.66,95% CI 0.40-1.10, p = 0.11)或OS(危险度0.97,95% CI 0.59-1.58, p = 0.89)没有显著影响。多因素分析显示,进展后过渡到最佳支持治疗(BSC),而不是初始剂量减少,与OS相关(风险比为7.40;p)结论:一线设置的奥西替尼剂量减少与较差的OS无关,表明适当的剂量调整有助于维持PS。进展后过渡到BSC,而不是初始剂量强度,与预后不良相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书