Proposed addendum to the 2006 US Food and Drug Administration guidance on chronic cutaneous ulcers and burn wounds: recommendations from the Wound Care Collaborative Community.
Windy Cole, Mitch Sanders, Vickie Driver, Marissa Carter, Peggy Dotson, Caroline Fife, Sarah Griffiths Langbord, Francis James, Holly Korzendorfer, Maribel Henao, Alisha Oropallo, Joseph Rolley, Robert Snyder, Marjana Tomic-Canic, Zweli Tunyiswa, Howard Walthall
{"title":"Proposed addendum to the 2006 US Food and Drug Administration guidance on chronic cutaneous ulcers and burn wounds: recommendations from the Wound Care Collaborative Community.","authors":"Windy Cole, Mitch Sanders, Vickie Driver, Marissa Carter, Peggy Dotson, Caroline Fife, Sarah Griffiths Langbord, Francis James, Holly Korzendorfer, Maribel Henao, Alisha Oropallo, Joseph Rolley, Robert Snyder, Marjana Tomic-Canic, Zweli Tunyiswa, Howard Walthall","doi":"10.25270/wnds/25132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Wound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC) presents this proposed addendum to the 2006 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for industry on chronic cutaneous ulcers and burn wounds, with this addendum reflecting nearly 2 decades of scientific and clinical progress. Key gaps in the original guidance have emerged with advances such as the Wound Reporting in Animal and Human Preclinical Studies (WRAHPS) reporting standards and the FDA Biomarker Qualification Program. This proposed addendum updates preclinical recommendations by emphasizing standardized bioassays for biologics, improved animal model selection using WRAHPS criteria, and acknowledgment that animal studies primarily assess safety rather than predict clinical efficacy. Clinical study design recommendations incorporate digital wound assessment technologies; standardized photographic documentation; expanded biomarker use; and innovative umbrella, basket, and platform trial designs to better address biological heterogeneity in chronic wounds. While reaffirming complete wound closure as the most clinically meaningful end point, the addendum also supports the development of validated alternative end points, including patient-reported outcomes. Additional updates include biofilm detection strategies, point of care diagnostic tools, and recognition of differences between clinical trial populations and real world patients. These evidence based recommendations aim to accelerate development of safe and effective wound care products while ensuring alignment with modern regulatory standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"38 6","pages":"155-165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/wnds/25132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Wound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC) presents this proposed addendum to the 2006 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for industry on chronic cutaneous ulcers and burn wounds, with this addendum reflecting nearly 2 decades of scientific and clinical progress. Key gaps in the original guidance have emerged with advances such as the Wound Reporting in Animal and Human Preclinical Studies (WRAHPS) reporting standards and the FDA Biomarker Qualification Program. This proposed addendum updates preclinical recommendations by emphasizing standardized bioassays for biologics, improved animal model selection using WRAHPS criteria, and acknowledgment that animal studies primarily assess safety rather than predict clinical efficacy. Clinical study design recommendations incorporate digital wound assessment technologies; standardized photographic documentation; expanded biomarker use; and innovative umbrella, basket, and platform trial designs to better address biological heterogeneity in chronic wounds. While reaffirming complete wound closure as the most clinically meaningful end point, the addendum also supports the development of validated alternative end points, including patient-reported outcomes. Additional updates include biofilm detection strategies, point of care diagnostic tools, and recognition of differences between clinical trial populations and real world patients. These evidence based recommendations aim to accelerate development of safe and effective wound care products while ensuring alignment with modern regulatory standards.
期刊介绍:
Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies.
Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more.
Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.