Regenerative Potential of Platelet-Rich Plasma-Loaded Scaffolds in Endometrial Damage: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Seyedeh-Tarlan Mirzohreh, Zohreh Mohammadi, Yalda Jahanbani, Mahshid Dehghan, Parvin Bastani Alamdari, Armin Imanzadeh Ghazijahani, Soodabeh Davaran, Michael Robert Doran
{"title":"Regenerative Potential of Platelet-Rich Plasma-Loaded Scaffolds in Endometrial Damage: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Seyedeh-Tarlan Mirzohreh, Zohreh Mohammadi, Yalda Jahanbani, Mahshid Dehghan, Parvin Bastani Alamdari, Armin Imanzadeh Ghazijahani, Soodabeh Davaran, Michael Robert Doran","doi":"10.1177/19373368261448723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-loaded scaffolds for endometrial regeneration in preclinical <i>in vivo</i> models. Endometrial damage, manifesting as endometrial thinning or adhesion formation within the uterine cavity, is a major cause of infertility. While PRP is a promising regenerative therapy, its short half-life limits its effectiveness. The hypothesis was that combining PRP with a hydrogel-based scaffold would provide sustained growth factor release and improve regenerative outcomes compared with monotherapies. The review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251004274). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was carried out through April 2025. Seven studies in rodent models met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that PRP/scaffold combinations significantly enhanced key outcomes over untreated controls, including endometrial thickness (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 2.85, <i>p</i> < 0.001), gland density (SMD = 4.11, <i>p</i> < 0.001), angiogenesis (SMD = 6.13, <i>p</i> < 0.001), fibrosis reduction (SMD = -5.21, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and embryo implantation rates (SMD = 4.04, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Injectable hydrogels were particularly effective. Compared with PRP alone, the PRP/hydrogels demonstrated improved performance across the majority of structural and functional parameters, though statistical significance varied, partly attributable to variability in scaffold materials and PRP preparation methods. These results suggest that PRP-loaded scaffolds represent a promising approach for improving both structural and functional endometrial regeneration. The therapeutic success is closely tied to the scaffold's degradation kinetics and its ability to preserve PRP bioactivity. This evidence supports the further development of standardized, degradable PRP-scaffold systems for clinical translation in treating endometrial infertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"19373368261448723"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19373368261448723","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-loaded scaffolds for endometrial regeneration in preclinical in vivo models. Endometrial damage, manifesting as endometrial thinning or adhesion formation within the uterine cavity, is a major cause of infertility. While PRP is a promising regenerative therapy, its short half-life limits its effectiveness. The hypothesis was that combining PRP with a hydrogel-based scaffold would provide sustained growth factor release and improve regenerative outcomes compared with monotherapies. The review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251004274). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was carried out through April 2025. Seven studies in rodent models met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that PRP/scaffold combinations significantly enhanced key outcomes over untreated controls, including endometrial thickness (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 2.85, p < 0.001), gland density (SMD = 4.11, p < 0.001), angiogenesis (SMD = 6.13, p < 0.001), fibrosis reduction (SMD = -5.21, p < 0.001), and embryo implantation rates (SMD = 4.04, p < 0.001). Injectable hydrogels were particularly effective. Compared with PRP alone, the PRP/hydrogels demonstrated improved performance across the majority of structural and functional parameters, though statistical significance varied, partly attributable to variability in scaffold materials and PRP preparation methods. These results suggest that PRP-loaded scaffolds represent a promising approach for improving both structural and functional endometrial regeneration. The therapeutic success is closely tied to the scaffold's degradation kinetics and its ability to preserve PRP bioactivity. This evidence supports the further development of standardized, degradable PRP-scaffold systems for clinical translation in treating endometrial infertility.

富血小板血浆负载支架在子宫内膜损伤中的再生潜力:荟萃分析。
本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了富血小板血浆(PRP)负载支架在临床前体内模型中用于子宫内膜再生的疗效。子宫内膜损伤,表现为子宫内膜变薄或子宫腔内粘连形成,是导致不孕的主要原因。虽然PRP是一种很有前途的再生疗法,但它的半衰期短限制了它的有效性。假设PRP与水凝胶支架相结合,与单一治疗相比,可以提供持续的生长因子释放并改善再生结果。该审查按照PRISMA指南进行,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251004274)。到2025年4月,对PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库进行了全面的搜索。7项啮齿类动物模型研究符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,PRP/支架组合显著提高了未治疗对照组的关键结果,包括子宫内膜厚度(标准化平均差[SMD] = 2.85, p < 0.001)、腺体密度(SMD = 4.11, p < 0.001)、血管生成(SMD = 6.13, p < 0.001)、纤维化减少(SMD = -5.21, p < 0.001)和胚胎着床率(SMD = 4.04, p < 0.001)。可注射的水凝胶尤其有效。与单独使用PRP相比,PRP/水凝胶在大多数结构和功能参数上表现出更好的性能,尽管统计显著性存在差异,部分原因是支架材料和PRP制备方法的差异。这些结果表明,prp负载支架代表了一种有希望的方法来改善结构和功能子宫内膜再生。治疗的成功与支架的降解动力学及其保持PRP生物活性的能力密切相关。这一证据支持进一步开发标准化、可降解的prp支架系统,用于治疗子宫内膜不孕症的临床转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering Reviews (Part B) meets the urgent need for high-quality review articles by presenting critical literature overviews and systematic summaries of research within the field to assess the current standing and future directions within relevant areas and technologies. Part B publishes bi-monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书