Withdrawal effects following treatment discontinuation: A blind spot in evidence-based medicine.

IF 13.3 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Med Pub Date : 2026-07-10 Epub Date: 2026-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.medj.2026.101181
Alexander G Mathioudakis
{"title":"Withdrawal effects following treatment discontinuation: A blind spot in evidence-based medicine.","authors":"Alexander G Mathioudakis","doi":"10.1016/j.medj.2026.101181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment withdrawal effects are transient increases in clinical risk following treatment discontinuation that exceed the loss of treatment effect alone. They have been described across multiple therapeutic classes spanning diverse disease areas yet remain under-recognized and insufficiently addressed in both research and clinical practice. Because treatment interruption and non-adherence are common in routine care, failure to account for these effects can distort clinical decision-making and the generation and interpretation of research evidence. Withdrawal effects arise from treatment-induced biological adaptations that persist after cessation, creating a transient period of heightened vulnerability. Despite their clinical relevance, they are not consistently anticipated or explicitly incorporated into research design, analysis, or guideline development. This perspective argues that treatment discontinuation represents a distinct and clinically meaningful phase of exposure and outlines implications across the evidence continuum and clinical practice, alongside approaches to better identify and interpret withdrawal-related risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":29964,"journal":{"name":"Med","volume":" ","pages":"101181"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2026.101181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment withdrawal effects are transient increases in clinical risk following treatment discontinuation that exceed the loss of treatment effect alone. They have been described across multiple therapeutic classes spanning diverse disease areas yet remain under-recognized and insufficiently addressed in both research and clinical practice. Because treatment interruption and non-adherence are common in routine care, failure to account for these effects can distort clinical decision-making and the generation and interpretation of research evidence. Withdrawal effects arise from treatment-induced biological adaptations that persist after cessation, creating a transient period of heightened vulnerability. Despite their clinical relevance, they are not consistently anticipated or explicitly incorporated into research design, analysis, or guideline development. This perspective argues that treatment discontinuation represents a distinct and clinically meaningful phase of exposure and outlines implications across the evidence continuum and clinical practice, alongside approaches to better identify and interpret withdrawal-related risks.

停药后的戒断效应:循证医学的盲点。
治疗停药效应是指停药后临床风险的短暂增加,其程度超过单纯治疗效果的丧失。它们已被描述为跨越多种疾病领域的多种治疗类别,但在研究和临床实践中仍未得到充分认识和解决。由于治疗中断和不依从性在常规护理中很常见,未能解释这些影响可能会扭曲临床决策以及研究证据的生成和解释。停药效应源于治疗诱导的生物适应,这种适应在停药后持续存在,造成短暂的脆弱性加剧。尽管它们具有临床相关性,但它们并没有被一致地预期或明确地纳入研究设计、分析或指南制定中。这一观点认为,停药代表了一个独特的、有临床意义的暴露阶段,并概述了证据连续体和临床实践的影响,以及更好地识别和解释停药相关风险的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Med
Med MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Med is a flagship medical journal published monthly by Cell Press, the global publisher of trusted and authoritative science journals including Cell, Cancer Cell, and Cell Reports Medicine. Our mission is to advance clinical research and practice by providing a communication forum for the publication of clinical trial results, innovative observations from longitudinal cohorts, and pioneering discoveries about disease mechanisms. The journal also encourages thought-leadership discussions among biomedical researchers, physicians, and other health scientists and stakeholders. Our goal is to improve health worldwide sustainably and ethically. Med publishes rigorously vetted original research and cutting-edge review and perspective articles on critical health issues globally and regionally. Our research section covers clinical case reports, first-in-human studies, large-scale clinical trials, population-based studies, as well as translational research work with the potential to change the course of medical research and improve clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书