The renin angiotensin system in cognitive flexibility: Effects of single-dose losartan on task-switching in healthy volunteers.

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-18 DOI:10.1177/02698811261456198
Divya Prasad, Georgia Feltham, Riccardo De Giorgi, Sara Costi, Elaine Fox, Amy L Gillespie, Andrea Reinecke
{"title":"The renin angiotensin system in cognitive flexibility: Effects of single-dose losartan on task-switching in healthy volunteers.","authors":"Divya Prasad, Georgia Feltham, Riccardo De Giorgi, Sara Costi, Elaine Fox, Amy L Gillespie, Andrea Reinecke","doi":"10.1177/02698811261456198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive flexibility, defined as the ability to shift mental strategies when environmental demands change, may influence psychological well-being and psychiatric treatment outcomes. Research increasingly implicates the renin angiotensin system (RAS) in cognition, yet its role in cognitive flexibility is inadequately understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a double-masked trial with <i>N</i> = 60 healthy adults aged 18-50. Participants were randomly assigned a single 50 mg dose of losartan, an angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, or placebo. Following a waiting period, participants completed a task-switching paradigm as a measure of cognitive flexibility, which required dynamically categorizing arrows based on location or direction. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine group (losartan vs placebo), task (location vs direction), and switch (switching vs repeating a task) effects on reaction time (RT) and accuracy independently. A composite bin score was also computed, integrating both RT and accuracy data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants displayed the expected switch costs. While participants on losartan exhibited numerically superior RTs and accuracy, losartan did not significantly improve task-switching relative to placebo. This was confirmed by composite bin scoring, which indicated no benefit of losartan when RT and accuracy were integrated. An exploratory probe suggested that losartan improved accuracy on direction-switch trials, indicating a potential drug effect under specific cognitive conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, we found no significant benefits of losartan on task-switching in healthy adults. Our results may be explained by ceiling effects, which could have hindered the detection of group differences, or possibly reflect a negligible role for the RAS in cognitive flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1670-1676"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13683925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811261456198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive flexibility, defined as the ability to shift mental strategies when environmental demands change, may influence psychological well-being and psychiatric treatment outcomes. Research increasingly implicates the renin angiotensin system (RAS) in cognition, yet its role in cognitive flexibility is inadequately understood.

Methods: We conducted a double-masked trial with N = 60 healthy adults aged 18-50. Participants were randomly assigned a single 50 mg dose of losartan, an angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, or placebo. Following a waiting period, participants completed a task-switching paradigm as a measure of cognitive flexibility, which required dynamically categorizing arrows based on location or direction. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine group (losartan vs placebo), task (location vs direction), and switch (switching vs repeating a task) effects on reaction time (RT) and accuracy independently. A composite bin score was also computed, integrating both RT and accuracy data.

Results: All participants displayed the expected switch costs. While participants on losartan exhibited numerically superior RTs and accuracy, losartan did not significantly improve task-switching relative to placebo. This was confirmed by composite bin scoring, which indicated no benefit of losartan when RT and accuracy were integrated. An exploratory probe suggested that losartan improved accuracy on direction-switch trials, indicating a potential drug effect under specific cognitive conditions.

Conclusion: Overall, we found no significant benefits of losartan on task-switching in healthy adults. Our results may be explained by ceiling effects, which could have hindered the detection of group differences, or possibly reflect a negligible role for the RAS in cognitive flexibility.

认知灵活性中的肾素血管紧张素系统:单剂量氯沙坦对健康志愿者任务转换的影响。
认知灵活性,定义为当环境需求改变时改变心理策略的能力,可能影响心理健康和精神治疗结果。越来越多的研究表明肾素血管紧张素系统(RAS)与认知有关,但其在认知灵活性中的作用尚不清楚。方法:采用双盲试验,年龄在18-50岁的健康成人60例。参与者被随机分配50mg剂量的氯沙坦,一种血管紧张素1型受体阻滞剂,或安慰剂。在等待一段时间后,参与者完成了一个任务转换范式,作为认知灵活性的衡量标准,该范式要求根据位置或方向对箭头进行动态分类。进行统计分析以确定组(氯沙坦vs安慰剂)、任务(位置vs方向)和切换(切换vs重复任务)对反应时间(RT)和准确性的独立影响。综合RT和准确率数据,计算复合bin评分。结果:所有参与者都显示了预期的转换成本。虽然氯沙坦组的参与者表现出数字上的优越的RTs和准确性,但相对于安慰剂组,氯沙坦并没有显著改善任务转换。综合bin评分证实了这一点,当综合RT和准确性时,氯沙坦没有任何益处。一项探索性研究表明,氯沙坦提高了方向切换试验的准确性,表明在特定的认知条件下有潜在的药物作用。结论:总的来说,我们发现氯沙坦对健康成人的任务转换没有显著的益处。我们的结果可以用天花板效应来解释,天花板效应可能阻碍了对群体差异的检测,或者可能反映了RAS在认知灵活性中可以忽略不计的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书