Divya Prasad, Georgia Feltham, Riccardo De Giorgi, Sara Costi, Elaine Fox, Amy L Gillespie, Andrea Reinecke
{"title":"The renin angiotensin system in cognitive flexibility: Effects of single-dose losartan on task-switching in healthy volunteers.","authors":"Divya Prasad, Georgia Feltham, Riccardo De Giorgi, Sara Costi, Elaine Fox, Amy L Gillespie, Andrea Reinecke","doi":"10.1177/02698811261456198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive flexibility, defined as the ability to shift mental strategies when environmental demands change, may influence psychological well-being and psychiatric treatment outcomes. Research increasingly implicates the renin angiotensin system (RAS) in cognition, yet its role in cognitive flexibility is inadequately understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a double-masked trial with <i>N</i> = 60 healthy adults aged 18-50. Participants were randomly assigned a single 50 mg dose of losartan, an angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, or placebo. Following a waiting period, participants completed a task-switching paradigm as a measure of cognitive flexibility, which required dynamically categorizing arrows based on location or direction. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine group (losartan vs placebo), task (location vs direction), and switch (switching vs repeating a task) effects on reaction time (RT) and accuracy independently. A composite bin score was also computed, integrating both RT and accuracy data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants displayed the expected switch costs. While participants on losartan exhibited numerically superior RTs and accuracy, losartan did not significantly improve task-switching relative to placebo. This was confirmed by composite bin scoring, which indicated no benefit of losartan when RT and accuracy were integrated. An exploratory probe suggested that losartan improved accuracy on direction-switch trials, indicating a potential drug effect under specific cognitive conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, we found no significant benefits of losartan on task-switching in healthy adults. Our results may be explained by ceiling effects, which could have hindered the detection of group differences, or possibly reflect a negligible role for the RAS in cognitive flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1670-1676"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13683925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811261456198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Cognitive flexibility, defined as the ability to shift mental strategies when environmental demands change, may influence psychological well-being and psychiatric treatment outcomes. Research increasingly implicates the renin angiotensin system (RAS) in cognition, yet its role in cognitive flexibility is inadequately understood.
Methods: We conducted a double-masked trial with N = 60 healthy adults aged 18-50. Participants were randomly assigned a single 50 mg dose of losartan, an angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, or placebo. Following a waiting period, participants completed a task-switching paradigm as a measure of cognitive flexibility, which required dynamically categorizing arrows based on location or direction. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine group (losartan vs placebo), task (location vs direction), and switch (switching vs repeating a task) effects on reaction time (RT) and accuracy independently. A composite bin score was also computed, integrating both RT and accuracy data.
Results: All participants displayed the expected switch costs. While participants on losartan exhibited numerically superior RTs and accuracy, losartan did not significantly improve task-switching relative to placebo. This was confirmed by composite bin scoring, which indicated no benefit of losartan when RT and accuracy were integrated. An exploratory probe suggested that losartan improved accuracy on direction-switch trials, indicating a potential drug effect under specific cognitive conditions.
Conclusion: Overall, we found no significant benefits of losartan on task-switching in healthy adults. Our results may be explained by ceiling effects, which could have hindered the detection of group differences, or possibly reflect a negligible role for the RAS in cognitive flexibility.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.