Multilevel Nutrition Interventions for Obesity Prevention Among Children With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2026-08-11 Epub Date: 2026-06-17 DOI:10.1111/obr.70181
Angela C. B. Trude, Zoya N. Rehman, Andrea L. Deierlein
{"title":"Multilevel Nutrition Interventions for Obesity Prevention Among Children With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review","authors":"Angela C. B. Trude,&nbsp;Zoya N. Rehman,&nbsp;Andrea L. Deierlein","doi":"10.1111/obr.70181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Childhood obesity disproportionately affects children with intellectual and developmental disabilities, in part due to additional risks, including food selectivity, metabolic differences, and systemic inequities. Given the critical role of nutrition in obesity prevention, this systematic review examines the effectiveness of nutrition-based interventions targeting intellectual and developmental disabilities across socio-ecological levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This review followed PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID # CRD42023493651). A search of four electronic databases (PubMed MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase) identified articles evaluating nutrition-based obesity prevention interventions for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Inclusion criteria encompassed interventions implemented at household, school, community, or policy levels, with outcomes measuring diet-related behaviors and obesity. Outcomes included diet-related behaviors and obesity indicators. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed quality. Articles were assessed for methodological quality and intervention effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 3531 initial citations, 10 articles met inclusion criteria. Most interventions were school-based and incorporated nutrition education, behavioral strategies, and environmental modifications. Of these, 80% targeted school-level interventions, with some extending to community and policy levels. Results showed improved diet-related behaviors, especially increased fruit and vegetable intake, though statistically significant reductions in obesity measures were not observed, likely due to small sample sizes and methodological limitations such as lack of control groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Nutrition-based interventions show promise in improving dietary behaviors among children with intellectual and developmental disabilities, but evidence on obesity reduction remains inconclusive. Future research should adopt rigorous study designs and incorporate family and community engagement to enhance intervention efficacy and sustainability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":"27 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.70181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Childhood obesity disproportionately affects children with intellectual and developmental disabilities, in part due to additional risks, including food selectivity, metabolic differences, and systemic inequities. Given the critical role of nutrition in obesity prevention, this systematic review examines the effectiveness of nutrition-based interventions targeting intellectual and developmental disabilities across socio-ecological levels.

Methods

This review followed PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID # CRD42023493651). A search of four electronic databases (PubMed MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase) identified articles evaluating nutrition-based obesity prevention interventions for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Inclusion criteria encompassed interventions implemented at household, school, community, or policy levels, with outcomes measuring diet-related behaviors and obesity. Outcomes included diet-related behaviors and obesity indicators. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed quality. Articles were assessed for methodological quality and intervention effectiveness.

Results

Of 3531 initial citations, 10 articles met inclusion criteria. Most interventions were school-based and incorporated nutrition education, behavioral strategies, and environmental modifications. Of these, 80% targeted school-level interventions, with some extending to community and policy levels. Results showed improved diet-related behaviors, especially increased fruit and vegetable intake, though statistically significant reductions in obesity measures were not observed, likely due to small sample sizes and methodological limitations such as lack of control groups.

Conclusion

Nutrition-based interventions show promise in improving dietary behaviors among children with intellectual and developmental disabilities, but evidence on obesity reduction remains inconclusive. Future research should adopt rigorous study designs and incorporate family and community engagement to enhance intervention efficacy and sustainability.

预防智力和发育障碍儿童肥胖的多层次营养干预:系统综述。
儿童肥胖对智力和发育障碍儿童的影响尤为严重,部分原因是额外的风险,包括食物选择、代谢差异和系统性不公平。鉴于营养在肥胖预防中的关键作用,本系统综述考察了在社会生态水平上针对智力和发育障碍的营养干预措施的有效性。方法:本综述遵循PRISMA指南(PROSPERO ID # CRD42023493651)。通过对四个电子数据库(PubMed MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase)的检索,我们发现了一些评估以营养为基础的肥胖预防干预措施对智力和发育障碍儿童的影响的文章。纳入标准包括在家庭、学校、社区或政策层面实施的干预措施,其结果衡量饮食相关行为和肥胖。结果包括饮食相关行为和肥胖指标。两名独立审稿人筛选文章,提取数据并评估质量。对文章的方法学质量和干预效果进行评估。结果:3531篇初始引用中,有10篇文章符合纳入标准。大多数干预措施以学校为基础,包括营养教育、行为策略和环境改变。其中,80%针对学校一级的干预措施,其中一些扩展到社区和政策一级。结果显示,饮食相关行为有所改善,尤其是水果和蔬菜摄入量增加,但没有观察到统计上显著的肥胖减少,可能是由于样本量小,以及缺乏对照组等方法上的局限性。结论:以营养为基础的干预措施有望改善智力和发育障碍儿童的饮食行为,但在减少肥胖方面的证据仍不确定。未来的研究应采用严格的研究设计,并纳入家庭和社区参与,以提高干预的有效性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书