{"title":"Observing the phenomenon of voluntary van-dwelling as a site of nomadic utopianism","authors":"Linda Naughton","doi":"10.1080/17450101.2025.2576273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper develops a conceptual framework for analysing the phenomenon of van-dwelling as a site of and for utopian thought, and as an example of nomadic utopianism. It draws on literature from the philosophy of nomadology, critical mobilities of nomadism, and nomadic utopianism. Nomadic philosophy is connected to utopian thought and action through a proposed ‘utopic system’ of desire, horizon, and programme. This framework is used to analyse interview data collected from nineteen van-dwellers situated in central Portugal in 2024. The focus is on the tensions between state and nomad thought/utopianisms and their associated productions of striated and smooth space through the processes of (re)territorialisation and deterritorialisation (Deleuze and Guattari <span><span>2004a</span></span>). The results reveal a continuous intra-action between the assemblages of state/nomad utopianisms, dwelling/travelling, and striated/smooth space. Within the limitations of a small, local sample, van-dwelling is confirmed as a site of and for utopian thought and an example of nomadic utopianism. This extends our understanding beyond Sargent’s three faces of utopianism (literature, social thought, intentional social experiment), and contributes to an understanding of van-dwelling as an invitation to move into the marginal where state utopianisms can be challenged, resisted, or subverted in deterritorialised smooth space.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51457,"journal":{"name":"Mobilities","volume":"21 3","pages":"Pages 765-781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobilities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S174501012500075X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper develops a conceptual framework for analysing the phenomenon of van-dwelling as a site of and for utopian thought, and as an example of nomadic utopianism. It draws on literature from the philosophy of nomadology, critical mobilities of nomadism, and nomadic utopianism. Nomadic philosophy is connected to utopian thought and action through a proposed ‘utopic system’ of desire, horizon, and programme. This framework is used to analyse interview data collected from nineteen van-dwellers situated in central Portugal in 2024. The focus is on the tensions between state and nomad thought/utopianisms and their associated productions of striated and smooth space through the processes of (re)territorialisation and deterritorialisation (Deleuze and Guattari 2004a). The results reveal a continuous intra-action between the assemblages of state/nomad utopianisms, dwelling/travelling, and striated/smooth space. Within the limitations of a small, local sample, van-dwelling is confirmed as a site of and for utopian thought and an example of nomadic utopianism. This extends our understanding beyond Sargent’s three faces of utopianism (literature, social thought, intentional social experiment), and contributes to an understanding of van-dwelling as an invitation to move into the marginal where state utopianisms can be challenged, resisted, or subverted in deterritorialised smooth space.
期刊介绍:
Mobilities examines both the large-scale movements of people, objects, capital, and information across the world, as well as more local processes of daily transportation, movement through public and private spaces, and the travel of material things in everyday life. Recent developments in transportation and communications infrastructures, along with new social and cultural practices of mobility, present new challenges for the coordination and governance of mobilities and for the protection of mobility rights and access. This has elicited many new research methods and theories relevant for understanding the connections between diverse mobilities and immobilities.