Impact of Changing the General Anesthesia Method on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Incident and Severity.

Rina Sato, Yoshito Ohyama, Hikaru Sato, Shota Abe, Hiroyoshi Kawaai, Shinya Yamazaki
{"title":"Impact of Changing the General Anesthesia Method on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Incident and Severity.","authors":"Rina Sato, Yoshito Ohyama, Hikaru Sato, Shota Abe, Hiroyoshi Kawaai, Shinya Yamazaki","doi":"10.2344/25-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Among patients who underwent general anesthesia (GA) multiple times with different methods, we aimed to compare the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) when the GA method was changed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were healthy intellectually disabled patients who underwent multiple dental procedures under GA. Methods of general anesthesia were classified as (1) nitrous oxide-sevoflurane (NOS), (2) sevoflurane-remifentanil (SRF), and (3) propofol-remifentanil (PRF). Patients who experienced PONV had an alternative method of GA utilized for subsequent cases. PONV incident rates and severity scores overall and between groups were calculated and compared statistically for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PONV occurred in 186 (6.5%) of the 2872 cases and in 85 (28.8%) of the 295 patients included in this study. Statistical paired comparisons of the mean incidence of PONV demonstrated a decrease of 25.2% when the GA method was changed from NOS to SRF, 40.4% when changed from NOS to PRF, and 36.4% when changed from SRF to PRF (P < .05). Statistical paired comparisons of the mean 5-point PONV severity score similarly demonstrated a decrease of 0.53 when the GA method was changed from NOS to SRF, 0.92 when changed from NOS to PRF, and 0.62 when changed from SRF to PRF (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The highest PONV incidence rates and severity were noted with NOS, whereas PONV decreased significantly with SRF and PRF use. The absence of nitrous oxide and use of propofol were suggested as ways to alter the method of general anesthesia to reduce the incidence and improve the severity of PONV.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"73 2","pages":"71-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13266603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/25-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Among patients who underwent general anesthesia (GA) multiple times with different methods, we aimed to compare the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) when the GA method was changed.

Methods: Subjects were healthy intellectually disabled patients who underwent multiple dental procedures under GA. Methods of general anesthesia were classified as (1) nitrous oxide-sevoflurane (NOS), (2) sevoflurane-remifentanil (SRF), and (3) propofol-remifentanil (PRF). Patients who experienced PONV had an alternative method of GA utilized for subsequent cases. PONV incident rates and severity scores overall and between groups were calculated and compared statistically for analysis.

Results: PONV occurred in 186 (6.5%) of the 2872 cases and in 85 (28.8%) of the 295 patients included in this study. Statistical paired comparisons of the mean incidence of PONV demonstrated a decrease of 25.2% when the GA method was changed from NOS to SRF, 40.4% when changed from NOS to PRF, and 36.4% when changed from SRF to PRF (P < .05). Statistical paired comparisons of the mean 5-point PONV severity score similarly demonstrated a decrease of 0.53 when the GA method was changed from NOS to SRF, 0.92 when changed from NOS to PRF, and 0.62 when changed from SRF to PRF (P < .05).

Conclusion: The highest PONV incidence rates and severity were noted with NOS, whereas PONV decreased significantly with SRF and PRF use. The absence of nitrous oxide and use of propofol were suggested as ways to alter the method of general anesthesia to reduce the incidence and improve the severity of PONV.

改变全身麻醉方式对术后恶心呕吐事件及严重程度的影响。
目的:对采用不同麻醉方式进行多次全身麻醉的患者,比较不同麻醉方式下患者术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率和严重程度。方法:研究对象为健康的智力障碍患者,在GA下进行了多次牙科手术。全身麻醉方法分为(1)氧化亚氮-七氟醚(NOS)、(2)七氟醚-瑞芬太尼(SRF)和(3)异丙酚-瑞芬太尼(PRF)。经历PONV的患者在随后的病例中采用了另一种GA方法。计算总组和组间PONV发生率和严重程度评分,并进行统计学比较分析。结果:2872例患者中有186例(6.5%)发生PONV, 295例患者中有85例(28.8%)发生PONV。统计学配对比较显示,GA方法由NOS改为SRF时,PONV的平均发生率下降25.2%,由NOS改为PRF时,PONV的发生率下降40.4%,由SRF改为PRF时,PONV的发生率下降36.4% (P < 0.05)。统计学配对比较显示,当GA方法从NOS改为SRF时,平均5分PONV严重程度评分下降了0.53,从NOS改为PRF时下降了0.92,从SRF改为PRF时下降了0.62 (P < 0.05)。结论:NOS组PONV发病率和严重程度最高,而SRF和PRF组PONV明显降低。建议采用无氧化亚氮和使用异丙酚作为改变全身麻醉方法的方法,以减少PONV的发生率和改善其严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书