Point-of-Care Ultrasound Guidelines From Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Internal Medicine for Curriculum Development: A Narrative Review.

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-15 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-25-00546.1
Jordan Nickols, Nathan Douthit
{"title":"Point-of-Care Ultrasound Guidelines From Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Internal Medicine for Curriculum Development: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Jordan Nickols, Nathan Douthit","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-25-00546.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family medicine (FM) and emergency medicine (EM) have Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-mandated point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training. While POCUS has many uses in internal medicine (IM), lack of mandated training has resulted in wide variation and lack of standardization in graduate medical education (GME) curricula.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a narrative review asking the questions: what are the recommended POCUS curriculum elements across FM, EM, and IM, and how can these inform the development of a more standardized curriculum?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review was conducted in March 2024. Authors searched published materials from the following organizations: Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, American College of Emergency Physicians, College of Family Physicians of Canada, American Academy of Family Physicians, Canadian Society of Internal Medicine, Society of Hospital Medicine, Society of General Internal Medicine, Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, and American College of Physicians. Only documents endorsed for POCUS training/education were included. Narrative review was chosen due to the small number and large heterogeneity of documents. All documents were reviewed, and common themes were identified by the authors of the study; they were later compared using a large language model, and authors verified by repeat analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine documents, 2 online courses, and 5 procedural position statements were identified and reviewed. Both authors agreed on the final themes: POCUS uses, basic knowledge and teaching methods for POCUS, image number requirements and competency assessment, and quality control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is overlap between recommended curricula for POCUS in major organizations. Internal medicine does not have an apparent defined, standardized curriculum for GME.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"18 3","pages":"292-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13267195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-25-00546.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family medicine (FM) and emergency medicine (EM) have Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-mandated point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training. While POCUS has many uses in internal medicine (IM), lack of mandated training has resulted in wide variation and lack of standardization in graduate medical education (GME) curricula.

Objective: To perform a narrative review asking the questions: what are the recommended POCUS curriculum elements across FM, EM, and IM, and how can these inform the development of a more standardized curriculum?

Methods: This narrative review was conducted in March 2024. Authors searched published materials from the following organizations: Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, American College of Emergency Physicians, College of Family Physicians of Canada, American Academy of Family Physicians, Canadian Society of Internal Medicine, Society of Hospital Medicine, Society of General Internal Medicine, Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, and American College of Physicians. Only documents endorsed for POCUS training/education were included. Narrative review was chosen due to the small number and large heterogeneity of documents. All documents were reviewed, and common themes were identified by the authors of the study; they were later compared using a large language model, and authors verified by repeat analysis.

Results: Nine documents, 2 online courses, and 5 procedural position statements were identified and reviewed. Both authors agreed on the final themes: POCUS uses, basic knowledge and teaching methods for POCUS, image number requirements and competency assessment, and quality control.

Conclusions: There is overlap between recommended curricula for POCUS in major organizations. Internal medicine does not have an apparent defined, standardized curriculum for GME.

家庭医学、急诊医学和内科课程发展的护理点超声指南:叙述性回顾。
背景:家庭医学(FM)和急诊医学(EM)有研究生医学教育认证委员会授权的护理点超声(POCUS)培训。虽然POCUS在内科(IM)中有许多用途,但由于缺乏强制性培训,导致研究生医学教育(GME)课程差异很大,缺乏标准化。目的:进行叙述性回顾,提出以下问题:FM、EM和IM推荐的POCUS课程元素是什么,这些元素如何为更标准化课程的开发提供信息?方法:本研究于2024年3月进行叙述性回顾。作者检索了以下组织发表的资料:加拿大急诊医师协会、美国急诊医师学会、加拿大家庭医师学会、美国家庭医师学会、加拿大内科医学会、医院医学学会、普通内科医学会、学术内科联盟和美国内科医师学会。只包括为POCUS培训/教育背书的文件。由于文献数量少且异质性大,故选择叙述性综述。所有的文献都被审查,共同的主题被研究的作者确定;随后使用大型语言模型对它们进行比较,作者通过重复分析进行验证。结果:对9份文件、2门在线课程和5份程序性立场陈述进行了识别和审核。最后的主题是:POCUS的使用、POCUS的基本知识和教学方法、图像数量要求和能力评估以及质量控制。结论:主要组织的POCUS推荐课程之间存在重叠。内科医学没有明确的、标准化的GME课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书