Graduate Medical Education Data in the United States: Availability and Accessibility Across National Organizations.

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-15 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-25-00439.1
Angela E Thelen, Rebecca S Gates, Deena Khamees, Mary R C Haas, Alyssa A Pradarelli, John Burkhardt, Andrew E Krumm, Debra Weinstein, Brian C George
{"title":"Graduate Medical Education Data in the United States: Availability and Accessibility Across National Organizations.","authors":"Angela E Thelen, Rebecca S Gates, Deena Khamees, Mary R C Haas, Alyssa A Pradarelli, John Burkhardt, Andrew E Krumm, Debra Weinstein, Brian C George","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-25-00439.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Longitudinal, multi-organizational data have enormous potential for improving graduate medical education (GME) yet aggregating and sharing that data remain difficult.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine what data is collected and how data is shared by US medical education organizations, as a next step toward expanded sharing of GME data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten multispecialty US medical education and licensing organizations that participated in the 2019 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conference completed a pre-meeting data survey. Leaders from 9 of these organizations participated in semi-structured interviews conducted between January 2021 and May 2022. Content analysis of survey data and interview transcripts were used to construct a data inventory. Each of the 9 interviewed organizations reviewed and updated their inventory in January and February 2024. Inductive analyses of interview transcripts were conducted to identify additional themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre-meeting survey and interviews had a 100% (10 total) and 90% (9 of 10) response rate, respectively. Study participants collect a large amount of GME-related data, some of which is duplicative. None collect longer-term outcomes, including patient outcomes. There is also no common physician identifier used by all organizations, although Association of American Medical Colleges ID and National Provider Identifier have been adopted most widely. All organizations share data to varying degrees. Two themes emerged regarding ongoing efforts to expand data sharing: perceived benefits of a harmonized system and challenges to implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data are increasingly available from organizations collecting national GME data in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"18 3","pages":"334-350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13267203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-25-00439.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Longitudinal, multi-organizational data have enormous potential for improving graduate medical education (GME) yet aggregating and sharing that data remain difficult.

Objective: To determine what data is collected and how data is shared by US medical education organizations, as a next step toward expanded sharing of GME data.

Methods: Ten multispecialty US medical education and licensing organizations that participated in the 2019 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conference completed a pre-meeting data survey. Leaders from 9 of these organizations participated in semi-structured interviews conducted between January 2021 and May 2022. Content analysis of survey data and interview transcripts were used to construct a data inventory. Each of the 9 interviewed organizations reviewed and updated their inventory in January and February 2024. Inductive analyses of interview transcripts were conducted to identify additional themes.

Results: The pre-meeting survey and interviews had a 100% (10 total) and 90% (9 of 10) response rate, respectively. Study participants collect a large amount of GME-related data, some of which is duplicative. None collect longer-term outcomes, including patient outcomes. There is also no common physician identifier used by all organizations, although Association of American Medical Colleges ID and National Provider Identifier have been adopted most widely. All organizations share data to varying degrees. Two themes emerged regarding ongoing efforts to expand data sharing: perceived benefits of a harmonized system and challenges to implementation.

Conclusions: Data are increasingly available from organizations collecting national GME data in the United States.

美国研究生医学教育数据:全国组织的可用性和可及性。
背景:纵向的、多组织的数据在改善研究生医学教育(GME)方面具有巨大的潜力,但汇总和共享这些数据仍然很困难。目的:确定美国医学教育机构收集了哪些数据以及如何共享数据,作为扩大GME数据共享的下一步。方法:参加2019年美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院会议的10个多专业美国医学教育和许可组织完成了会前数据调查。其中9个组织的领导人参加了在2021年1月至2022年5月期间进行的半结构化访谈。利用调查数据的内容分析和访谈记录构建数据清单。9个受访组织中的每一个都在2024年1月和2月审查并更新了他们的库存。对访谈记录进行归纳分析,以确定其他主题。结果:会前调查和访谈的回复率分别为100%(共10次)和90%(10次中的9次)。研究参与者收集了大量与基因工程相关的数据,其中一些数据是重复的。没有收集长期结果,包括患者结果。虽然美国医学院协会ID和国家提供者标识符已被广泛采用,但也没有所有组织都使用的通用医师标识符。所有组织都在不同程度上共享数据。关于正在进行的扩大数据共享的努力,出现了两个主题:统一系统的预期利益和执行方面的挑战。结论:越来越多的数据来自于收集美国国家GME数据的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书