Untold Stories: An Intervention to Rekindle Empathy in Medicine.

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-15 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-25-00987.1
Jeffrey Lee, Katherine Kenyon Henderson, Elissa Rumer Nickolopoulos, Michelle J Tang, John David Ike, Jane P Gagliardi
{"title":"Untold Stories: An Intervention to Rekindle Empathy in Medicine.","authors":"Jeffrey Lee, Katherine Kenyon Henderson, Elissa Rumer Nickolopoulos, Michelle J Tang, John David Ike, Jane P Gagliardi","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-25-00987.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Empathy is vitally important in graduate medical education (GME) but may be difficult to sustain amid competing clinical, educational, research, and administrative demands. Medical humanities interventions may foster reflection and perspective-taking, yet few theory-informed interventions have been described in GME and interprofessional settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the development, acceptability, and feasibility of a visual arts and narrative medicine-based workshop for attending physicians, resident physicians, health care students, and interdisciplinary staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2023, patients at a safety-net primary care clinic participated in semistructured interviews and portrait sessions. Narratives, photographs, and de-identified clinical records created by the author team were integrated into a facilitated, discussion-based, 60- to 90-minute workshop grounded in the PRISM model and visual thinking strategies (VTS). Authors facilitated interventions across 6 settings, guiding structured observation and reflection of a single patient's electronic medical record, portrait, and audio interview. Participants completed post-workshop surveys assessing perceived empathy, understanding of patients' perspectives, and anticipated changes in patient care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-six participants completed workshop evaluations. Most agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop promoted empathy (141 of 156, 90.4%; 18 of 19, 94.7% for residents) and would positively influence their approach to patient care (144 of 156, 92.3%; 17 of 19, 89.5% for residents). Open-ended responses emphasized multidisciplinary perspectives and recognition of patients as whole individuals. The workshop was feasible to implement using standard educational time blocks, 2 facilitators familiar with VTS principles, and minimal audiovisual materials. This intervention is ongoing and being adapted within undergraduate medical education and GME.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This theory-informed humanities-based workshop was acceptable and feasible across diverse educational settings and learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"18 3","pages":"358-363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13267196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-25-00987.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Empathy is vitally important in graduate medical education (GME) but may be difficult to sustain amid competing clinical, educational, research, and administrative demands. Medical humanities interventions may foster reflection and perspective-taking, yet few theory-informed interventions have been described in GME and interprofessional settings.

Objective: To describe the development, acceptability, and feasibility of a visual arts and narrative medicine-based workshop for attending physicians, resident physicians, health care students, and interdisciplinary staff.

Methods: In 2023, patients at a safety-net primary care clinic participated in semistructured interviews and portrait sessions. Narratives, photographs, and de-identified clinical records created by the author team were integrated into a facilitated, discussion-based, 60- to 90-minute workshop grounded in the PRISM model and visual thinking strategies (VTS). Authors facilitated interventions across 6 settings, guiding structured observation and reflection of a single patient's electronic medical record, portrait, and audio interview. Participants completed post-workshop surveys assessing perceived empathy, understanding of patients' perspectives, and anticipated changes in patient care.

Results: One hundred fifty-six participants completed workshop evaluations. Most agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop promoted empathy (141 of 156, 90.4%; 18 of 19, 94.7% for residents) and would positively influence their approach to patient care (144 of 156, 92.3%; 17 of 19, 89.5% for residents). Open-ended responses emphasized multidisciplinary perspectives and recognition of patients as whole individuals. The workshop was feasible to implement using standard educational time blocks, 2 facilitators familiar with VTS principles, and minimal audiovisual materials. This intervention is ongoing and being adapted within undergraduate medical education and GME.

Conclusions: This theory-informed humanities-based workshop was acceptable and feasible across diverse educational settings and learners.

不为人知的故事:重新点燃医学同理心的干预。
背景:共情在研究生医学教育(GME)中至关重要,但在临床、教育、研究和管理需求的竞争中可能难以维持。医学人文干预可以促进反思和换位思考,但在GME和跨专业设置中很少有理论知情的干预。目的:描述为主治医师、住院医师、卫生保健学生和跨学科工作人员举办的视觉艺术和叙事医学研讨会的发展、可接受性和可行性。方法:2023年,安全网初级保健诊所的患者参加了半结构化访谈和肖像会议。在PRISM模型和视觉思维策略(VTS)的基础上,作者团队创建的叙述、照片和去识别的临床记录被整合到一个便利的、基于讨论的、60到90分钟的研讨会中。作者促进了6种设置的干预措施,指导对单个患者的电子病历、肖像和音频访谈进行结构化观察和反思。参与者完成了工作坊后的调查,评估感知移情、对患者观点的理解以及对患者护理变化的预期。结果:156名参与者完成了工作坊评估。大多数人同意或强烈同意工作坊促进了同理心(156人中有141人,90.4%;19人中有18人,住院医师94.7%),并对他们的病人护理方法产生积极影响(156人中有144人,92.3%;19人中有17人,住院医师89.5%)。开放式回答强调多学科视角和对患者作为整体个体的认识。使用标准的教学时间块、2名熟悉VTS原则的引导员和最少的视听材料,讲习班是可行的。这种干预正在进行中,并在本科医学教育和GME中进行调整。结论:这个以人文学科为基础的理论研讨会在不同的教育环境和学习者中是可以接受和可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书