Comparing Cisplatin Sensitivity in Conventional 2D Versus Biomaterialfree 3D Spheroid Cultures of Human Cancer and Bone Marrow Stromal Cells.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ceri-Anne Suurmond, Zhule Wang, Jose Kooloos, Sterre Andriessen, Sander Leeuwenburgh, Jeroen van den Beucken
{"title":"Comparing Cisplatin Sensitivity in Conventional 2D Versus Biomaterialfree 3D Spheroid Cultures of Human Cancer and Bone Marrow Stromal Cells.","authors":"Ceri-Anne Suurmond, Zhule Wang, Jose Kooloos, Sterre Andriessen, Sander Leeuwenburgh, Jeroen van den Beucken","doi":"10.2174/0115680096481806260605115025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bone metastases represent a devastating complication of primary cancers, significantly impacting patient survival and quality of life. Accelerating the development of novel and effective chemotherapeutic drugs requires reliable in vitro models. Current in vitro models largely rely on conventional 2D set-ups, while 3D spheroid cultures are emerging. However, the correlation between these 2D and 3D configurations regarding chemotherapeutic efficacy remains poorly defined due to discrepancies in cellular assessment methodologies. To achieve a direct, unconfounded comparison of cellular responses to cisplatin treatment, identical analytical assays were deployed across both 2D and 3D culture models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cisplatin sensitivity was comparatively evaluated in metastatic human cancer cell lines (PC3 prostate adenocarcinoma and MDA-MB-231 breast adenocarcinoma) cultured in conventional 2D monolayers versus biomaterial-free 3D spheroids. Proliferation and viability assays were used to assess cytotoxicity, with human Bone Marrow Stromal Cells (hBMSCs) as non-malignant controls. Additionally, the effects of acute (24-hour) versus continuous cisplatin exposure regimens on cellular behavior were examined, and drug sensitivity was subsequently correlated with cell doubling time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all cell types, 3D spheroid cultures exhibited significantly lower sensitivities to cisplatin compared to 2D cultures. This is likely related to both the dimensionality of the 3D spheroids, as evidenced by time- and concentration-dependent cisplatin penetration into hBMSC spheroids, and cell proliferation, as a correlation between cisplatin sensitivity and cell doubling time was observed across the various cell types used. Finally, we showed that continuous exposure to cisplatin affects cell viability in 2D and 3D culture models in a manner comparable to limited exposure during the initial 24 hours of culture, and that cisplatin sensitivity correlates with cell doubling time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Methodological similarities in analyzing cell viability were maintained for both 2D and 3D cell culture models when exploring cisplatin. Their dimensionality hampers penetration of cisplatin into the core of 3D spheroids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, our data underscore the dependence of cisplatin sensitivity on the dimensionality of in vitro models (2D vs. 3D.</p>","PeriodicalId":10816,"journal":{"name":"Current cancer drug targets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current cancer drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115680096481806260605115025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Bone metastases represent a devastating complication of primary cancers, significantly impacting patient survival and quality of life. Accelerating the development of novel and effective chemotherapeutic drugs requires reliable in vitro models. Current in vitro models largely rely on conventional 2D set-ups, while 3D spheroid cultures are emerging. However, the correlation between these 2D and 3D configurations regarding chemotherapeutic efficacy remains poorly defined due to discrepancies in cellular assessment methodologies. To achieve a direct, unconfounded comparison of cellular responses to cisplatin treatment, identical analytical assays were deployed across both 2D and 3D culture models.

Methods: Cisplatin sensitivity was comparatively evaluated in metastatic human cancer cell lines (PC3 prostate adenocarcinoma and MDA-MB-231 breast adenocarcinoma) cultured in conventional 2D monolayers versus biomaterial-free 3D spheroids. Proliferation and viability assays were used to assess cytotoxicity, with human Bone Marrow Stromal Cells (hBMSCs) as non-malignant controls. Additionally, the effects of acute (24-hour) versus continuous cisplatin exposure regimens on cellular behavior were examined, and drug sensitivity was subsequently correlated with cell doubling time.

Results: For all cell types, 3D spheroid cultures exhibited significantly lower sensitivities to cisplatin compared to 2D cultures. This is likely related to both the dimensionality of the 3D spheroids, as evidenced by time- and concentration-dependent cisplatin penetration into hBMSC spheroids, and cell proliferation, as a correlation between cisplatin sensitivity and cell doubling time was observed across the various cell types used. Finally, we showed that continuous exposure to cisplatin affects cell viability in 2D and 3D culture models in a manner comparable to limited exposure during the initial 24 hours of culture, and that cisplatin sensitivity correlates with cell doubling time.

Discussion: Methodological similarities in analyzing cell viability were maintained for both 2D and 3D cell culture models when exploring cisplatin. Their dimensionality hampers penetration of cisplatin into the core of 3D spheroids.

Conclusion: Overall, our data underscore the dependence of cisplatin sensitivity on the dimensionality of in vitro models (2D vs. 3D.

比较顺铂在常规2D与无生物材料3D人类肿瘤和骨髓基质细胞球体培养中的敏感性。
目的:骨转移是原发性癌症的一种破坏性并发症,严重影响患者的生存和生活质量。加速开发新型有效的化疗药物需要可靠的体外模型。目前体外模型主要依赖于传统的2D设置,而3D球体培养正在出现。然而,由于细胞评估方法的差异,这些2D和3D结构之间关于化疗疗效的相关性仍然很不明确。为了实现对顺铂治疗的细胞反应的直接、清晰的比较,在2D和3D培养模型中部署了相同的分析分析。方法:比较评价在常规二维单层培养的转移性人癌细胞系(PC3前列腺癌和MDA-MB-231乳腺腺癌)和无生物材料的三维球体培养的顺铂敏感性。增殖和活力测定用于评估细胞毒性,以人骨髓基质细胞(hBMSCs)作为非恶性对照。此外,研究了急性(24小时)与连续顺铂暴露方案对细胞行为的影响,并随后将药物敏感性与细胞倍增时间相关。结果:对于所有细胞类型,3D球形培养对顺铂的敏感性明显低于2D培养。这可能与三维球体的维度和细胞增殖有关,如时间和浓度依赖的顺铂渗透到hBMSC球体中所证明的,因为顺铂敏感性和细胞倍增时间之间的相关性在使用的各种细胞类型中观察到。最后,我们发现,在2D和3D培养模型中,连续暴露于顺铂对细胞活力的影响与培养最初24小时的有限暴露相当,并且顺铂敏感性与细胞倍增时间相关。讨论:在探索顺铂时,2D和3D细胞培养模型在分析细胞活力方面的方法相似。它们的维度阻碍了顺铂渗透到三维球体的核心。结论:总的来说,我们的数据强调了顺铂敏感性与体外模型维度(2D vs 3D)的依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current cancer drug targets
Current cancer drug targets 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Cancer Drug Targets aims to cover all the latest and outstanding developments on the medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, molecular biology, genomics and biochemistry of contemporary molecular drug targets involved in cancer, e.g. disease specific proteins, receptors, enzymes and genes. Current Cancer Drug Targets publishes original research articles, letters, reviews / mini-reviews, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues written by leaders in the field covering a range of current topics on drug targets involved in cancer. As the discovery, identification, characterization and validation of novel human drug targets for anti-cancer drug discovery continues to grow; this journal has become essential reading for all pharmaceutical scientists involved in drug discovery and development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书