EpiDARC-an epidemiological study of British Defence Primary Healthcare (DPHC) demand by the Defence Audit and Research Collaborative (DARC).

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Adrian Mark Hucks, Jacob Henry Matthews, Isobel Folkes, Kirsten A L Morris, Ruth Guest, Peter Bird, Jodie Blackadder-Weinstein, Antony Willman, Kate King
{"title":"EpiDARC-an epidemiological study of British Defence Primary Healthcare (DPHC) demand by the Defence Audit and Research Collaborative (DARC).","authors":"Adrian Mark Hucks, Jacob Henry Matthews, Isobel Folkes, Kirsten A L Morris, Ruth Guest, Peter Bird, Jodie Blackadder-Weinstein, Antony Willman, Kate King","doi":"10.1136/military-2026-003272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding the workload in military primary care is essential to inform policy making, resource allocation and training for the general practitioners of tomorrow. Due to well-recognised limitations with coding in primary care and additional barriers within UK Armed Forces (UKAF) Defence Primary Healthcare (DPHC), the understanding of reasons for visit (RFV) is difficult to ascertain from a top-down perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre, cross-sectional study to describe the frequency of patient RFV over a 2 week period in general practices across the DPHC network was undertaken. RFV was documented using the International Classification of Diseases 11 (ICD-11) tier one codes, with specific conditions highlighted based on published literature and Defence needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18 medical centres, representing all DPHC regions and 26% of the Defence population, were included. A total of 6693 RFV were recorded, which differed from the published literature for primary care in developed countries, cementing the function of DPHC as an occupationally focused service with musculoskeletal injuries and mental health presentations being most common.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DPHC can better understand the RFV across its service and intelligently target service delivery, pathway development and managed clinical networks based on this study, which differs from some previous evidence.This study also is a proof of concept for a network of researchers, collaborating with a Defence-wide perspective, allowing grassroots data collection outside of overburdened centralised systems and developing interest and engagement in research, audit and collaboration among our clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2026-003272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding the workload in military primary care is essential to inform policy making, resource allocation and training for the general practitioners of tomorrow. Due to well-recognised limitations with coding in primary care and additional barriers within UK Armed Forces (UKAF) Defence Primary Healthcare (DPHC), the understanding of reasons for visit (RFV) is difficult to ascertain from a top-down perspective.

Methods: A multicentre, cross-sectional study to describe the frequency of patient RFV over a 2 week period in general practices across the DPHC network was undertaken. RFV was documented using the International Classification of Diseases 11 (ICD-11) tier one codes, with specific conditions highlighted based on published literature and Defence needs.

Results: 18 medical centres, representing all DPHC regions and 26% of the Defence population, were included. A total of 6693 RFV were recorded, which differed from the published literature for primary care in developed countries, cementing the function of DPHC as an occupationally focused service with musculoskeletal injuries and mental health presentations being most common.

Conclusions: DPHC can better understand the RFV across its service and intelligently target service delivery, pathway development and managed clinical networks based on this study, which differs from some previous evidence.This study also is a proof of concept for a network of researchers, collaborating with a Defence-wide perspective, allowing grassroots data collection outside of overburdened centralised systems and developing interest and engagement in research, audit and collaboration among our clinicians.

epidarc -由国防审计和研究协作(DARC)对英国国防初级保健(DPHC)需求的流行病学研究。
简介:了解军队初级保健的工作量对未来全科医生的政策制定、资源分配和培训至关重要。由于公认的初级保健编码的局限性和英国武装部队(UKAF)国防初级保健(DPHC)内部的其他障碍,很难从自上而下的角度确定对访问原因(RFV)的理解。方法:通过一项多中心横断面研究,在DPHC网络的一般实践中描述患者RFV在2周内的频率。根据《国际疾病分类11》第一级代码记录了RFV,并根据已发表的文献和国防需要突出了具体情况。结果:包括18个医疗中心,代表所有DPHC地区和26%的国防人口。总共记录了6693例RFV,这与已发表的发达国家初级保健文献不同,巩固了DPHC作为以职业为重点的服务的功能,其中肌肉骨骼损伤和精神健康表现最为常见。结论:基于本研究,DPHC可以更好地了解其服务中的RFV,并智能地针对服务提供,途径开发和管理临床网络,这与之前的一些证据不同。这项研究也证明了研究人员网络的概念,与国防范围内的观点合作,允许在负担过重的中央系统之外收集基层数据,并在我们的临床医生之间培养研究、审计和合作的兴趣和参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书