Immediate postpartum depressive symptoms and future psychiatric diagnoses: A predictive analysis using the EPDS.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health Research Pub Date : 2026-06-13 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1177/22799036261451531
Kristyna Hrdlickova, Marie Hankova, Hana Burdova, Anna Horakova, Nancy Byatt, Antonin Sebela
{"title":"Immediate postpartum depressive symptoms and future psychiatric diagnoses: A predictive analysis using the EPDS.","authors":"Kristyna Hrdlickova, Marie Hankova, Hana Burdova, Anna Horakova, Nancy Byatt, Antonin Sebela","doi":"10.1177/22799036261451531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implementation of universal screening to identify women at risk of postnatal mental disorders has been recommended. Understanding whether depressive symptoms immediately postpartum, as detected by screening tools, predict later psychiatric diagnoses is crucial for guiding timely care and optimizing healthcare resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All participants completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) 2-5 days postpartum. Women with scores ≥ 10 were invited to the follow-up study, where psychiatric diagnoses at six weeks were assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5 (MINI). Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated. ROC analyses assessed predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 403 women were included. EPDS scores of ≥ 16 for a major depressive episode (AUC = 0.78, sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.84, PPV 0.14, NPV 0.99 within this high-risk sample) and ≥ 14 for any observed mental disorder (AUC = 0.69, sensitivity 0.65, specificity 0.73, PPV 0.24, NPV 0.94) were identified as optimal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In women with elevated depressive symptoms shortly after delivery, the EPDS showed high NPV, supporting its usefulness for ruling out severe psychopathology at six weeks postpartum. However, the low PPV indicates that elevated scores often reflect transient postpartum distress rather than a confirmed disorder. Routine immediate-postpartum EPDS screening should therefore be approached with caution. Findings support a tiered approach-for example, brief initial inquiries followed by the EPDS and diagnostic follow-up for higher scores-and the development of screening tools better adapted to the immediate postpartum period.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"15 2","pages":"22799036261451531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13264664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036261451531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The implementation of universal screening to identify women at risk of postnatal mental disorders has been recommended. Understanding whether depressive symptoms immediately postpartum, as detected by screening tools, predict later psychiatric diagnoses is crucial for guiding timely care and optimizing healthcare resources.

Methods: All participants completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) 2-5 days postpartum. Women with scores ≥ 10 were invited to the follow-up study, where psychiatric diagnoses at six weeks were assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5 (MINI). Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated. ROC analyses assessed predictive accuracy.

Results: A total of 403 women were included. EPDS scores of ≥ 16 for a major depressive episode (AUC = 0.78, sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.84, PPV 0.14, NPV 0.99 within this high-risk sample) and ≥ 14 for any observed mental disorder (AUC = 0.69, sensitivity 0.65, specificity 0.73, PPV 0.24, NPV 0.94) were identified as optimal.

Conclusions: In women with elevated depressive symptoms shortly after delivery, the EPDS showed high NPV, supporting its usefulness for ruling out severe psychopathology at six weeks postpartum. However, the low PPV indicates that elevated scores often reflect transient postpartum distress rather than a confirmed disorder. Routine immediate-postpartum EPDS screening should therefore be approached with caution. Findings support a tiered approach-for example, brief initial inquiries followed by the EPDS and diagnostic follow-up for higher scores-and the development of screening tools better adapted to the immediate postpartum period.

产后立即抑郁症状和未来精神诊断:使用EPDS的预测分析
背景:建议实施普遍筛查,以确定有产后精神障碍风险的妇女。了解通过筛查工具检测到的产后抑郁症状是否能预测日后的精神疾病诊断,对于指导及时护理和优化医疗资源至关重要。方法:所有参与者在产后2-5天完成爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)。评分≥10分的女性被邀请参加随访研究,在六周时使用MINI -国际神经精神病学访谈5 (MINI)评估精神病学诊断。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性(PPV)和阴性(NPV)预测值。ROC分析评估预测准确性。结果:共纳入403名女性。重度抑郁发作的EPDS评分≥16 (AUC = 0.78,敏感性0.71,特异性0.84,PPV 0.14, NPV 0.99)和任何观察到的精神障碍的EPDS评分≥14 (AUC = 0.69,敏感性0.65,特异性0.73,PPV 0.24, NPV 0.94)被认为是最佳的。结论:在产后不久抑郁症状升高的妇女中,EPDS显示出高NPV,支持其在产后六周排除严重精神病理的有用性。然而,较低的PPV表明,较高的分数往往反映了短暂的产后痛苦,而不是确诊的疾病。因此,应谨慎进行常规产后即刻EPDS筛查。研究结果支持分层方法——例如,简短的初步询问,随后进行EPDS和诊断随访,以获得更高的分数——以及开发更适合产后时期的筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Research
Journal of Public Health Research PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书