Physics-informed, phenotype-based endotamponade selection in vitreoretinal surgery: current agents and emerging vitreous substitutes.

IF 3.8 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Miguel A Quiroz-Reyes, Erick A Quiroz-Gonzalez, Miguel A Quiroz Gonzalez, Virgilio Lima-Gomez
{"title":"Physics-informed, phenotype-based endotamponade selection in vitreoretinal surgery: current agents and emerging vitreous substitutes.","authors":"Miguel A Quiroz-Reyes, Erick A Quiroz-Gonzalez, Miguel A Quiroz Gonzalez, Virgilio Lima-Gomez","doi":"10.1186/s40942-026-00878-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endotamponade selection is best understood as a physics-informed, phenotype-based decision rather than one driven mainly by tamponade duration or material class. This narrative review integrates density, interfacial tension, contact angle, viscosity, and drug-tamponade interactions with phenotype-specific clinical outcomes. The result is a practical framework linking tamponade behavior to retinal geography, disease complexity, and postoperative feasibility.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>Lighter-than-water agents (air, expansile gases, and light silicone oils [LSOs]) preferentially support the superior retina, whereas heavy silicone oils (HSOs) and perfluorocarbon liquids (PFCLs) provide stronger inferior support. In uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and many idiopathic macular holes (MHs), air or sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) usually achieves high anatomical success with less early intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation and cataract burden than longer-acting gas or silicone oil when brief postoperative positioning is feasible. LSO remains the principal long-term option for complex, tractional, and traumatic disease because it provides durable, relatively posture-independent support, but at the cost of emulsification, cataract, pressure-related, and corneal complications. HSO and staged short-term PFCL are best viewed as selective strategies for inferior-predominant giant retinal tear (GRT) or posture-limited phenotypes, where the mechanistic rationale is strong but comparative evidence remains largely observational. Hydrogel-based vitreous substitutes are promising but remain investigational.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence supports a physics-informed, phenotype-based approach to endotamponade selection. Future research should prioritize phenotype-stratified comparative studies with standardized anatomical and emulsification endpoints and rigorous evaluation of emerging vitreous substitutes in well-defined clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":14289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13504771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-026-00878-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endotamponade selection is best understood as a physics-informed, phenotype-based decision rather than one driven mainly by tamponade duration or material class. This narrative review integrates density, interfacial tension, contact angle, viscosity, and drug-tamponade interactions with phenotype-specific clinical outcomes. The result is a practical framework linking tamponade behavior to retinal geography, disease complexity, and postoperative feasibility.

Main body: Lighter-than-water agents (air, expansile gases, and light silicone oils [LSOs]) preferentially support the superior retina, whereas heavy silicone oils (HSOs) and perfluorocarbon liquids (PFCLs) provide stronger inferior support. In uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and many idiopathic macular holes (MHs), air or sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) usually achieves high anatomical success with less early intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation and cataract burden than longer-acting gas or silicone oil when brief postoperative positioning is feasible. LSO remains the principal long-term option for complex, tractional, and traumatic disease because it provides durable, relatively posture-independent support, but at the cost of emulsification, cataract, pressure-related, and corneal complications. HSO and staged short-term PFCL are best viewed as selective strategies for inferior-predominant giant retinal tear (GRT) or posture-limited phenotypes, where the mechanistic rationale is strong but comparative evidence remains largely observational. Hydrogel-based vitreous substitutes are promising but remain investigational.

Conclusions: Current evidence supports a physics-informed, phenotype-based approach to endotamponade selection. Future research should prioritize phenotype-stratified comparative studies with standardized anatomical and emulsification endpoints and rigorous evaluation of emerging vitreous substitutes in well-defined clinical settings.

Trial registration: Not applied.

玻璃体视网膜手术中基于物理的、基于表型的内膜填塞选择:当前的药物和新兴的玻璃体替代品。
背景:内部填塞选择最好被理解为一种物理信息,基于表型的决定,而不是主要由填塞时间或材料类别驱动的决定。这篇叙述性综述整合了密度、界面张力、接触角、粘度和药物填塞与表型特异性临床结果的相互作用。结果是一个实用的框架,将填塞行为与视网膜地理、疾病复杂性和术后可行性联系起来。主体:比水轻的物质(空气、膨胀气体和轻质硅油[lso])优先支持上视网膜,而重硅油(hso)和全氟碳化合物液体(PFCLs)提供更强的下支撑。在简单的孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)和许多特发性黄斑孔(MHs)中,当术后短暂定位可行时,空气或六氟化硫(SF₆)通常比长效气体或硅油在早期眼压(IOP)升高和白内障负担方面获得较高的解剖成功率。LSO仍然是复杂、牵引性和创伤性疾病的主要长期选择,因为它提供了持久的、相对独立于姿势的支持,但代价是乳化、白内障、压力相关和角膜并发症。HSO和分期短期PFCL最好被视为治疗下显性巨大视网膜撕裂(GRT)或姿势受限表型的选择性策略,其中机制原理很强,但比较证据主要是观察性的。基于水凝胶的玻璃体替代品很有前途,但仍处于研究阶段。结论:目前的证据支持基于物理的、基于表型的内膜填塞选择方法。未来的研究应优先考虑具有标准化解剖和乳化终点的表型分层比较研究,并在明确的临床环境中严格评估新出现的玻璃体替代品。试验注册:未申请。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Retina and Vitreous focuses on the ophthalmic subspecialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The journal presents original articles on new approaches to diagnosis, outcomes of clinical trials, innovations in pharmacological therapy and surgical techniques, as well as basic science advances that impact clinical practice. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Imaging of the retina, choroid and vitreous -Innovations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) -Small-gauge vitrectomy, retinal detachment, chromovitrectomy -Electroretinography (ERG), microperimetry, other functional tests -Intraocular tumors -Retinal pharmacotherapy & drug delivery -Diabetic retinopathy & other vascular diseases -Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) & other macular entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书