Long-term safety and efficacy of sepetaprost, with or without timolol, in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: results from the randomised, phase 3 ANGEL-J2 study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-16 DOI:10.1007/s10384-026-01351-2
Masaru Inatani, Yuko Tone, Toshihiro Ikeda, Raymund Angeles
{"title":"Long-term safety and efficacy of sepetaprost, with or without timolol, in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: results from the randomised, phase 3 ANGEL-J2 study.","authors":"Masaru Inatani, Yuko Tone, Toshihiro Ikeda, Raymund Angeles","doi":"10.1007/s10384-026-01351-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the long-term safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of sepetaprost, a novel dual FP/EP3 receptor agonist, in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>ANGEL-J2 (NCT05503901) was a phase 3, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study across 20 sites in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with IOP ≥16 and <22 mmHg were assigned to once-daily sepetaprost 0.002% (Group 1), whereas patients with IOP ≥22 and ≤34 mmHg were randomised 1:1 to once-daily sepetaprost 0.002% alone (Group 2) and with twice-daily timolol 0.5% (Group 3). Over 52 weeks of treatment, efficacy was assessed as the change in mean diurnal IOP from baseline; safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 131 patients were assigned to Group 1 (n=49), Group 2 (n=42), or Group 3 (n=40). In each group, treatment was associated with rapid and sustained reductions in IOP versus baseline (p<0.0001 at all time-points). Mean (± standard error) change in diurnal IOP from baseline at week 52 was -4.40±0.24, -6.38±0.32, and -7.51±0.29 mmHg in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; similarly, mixed model for repeated measures analyses found that reductions in mean diurnal IOP over 52 weeks were greater in Group 3 versus Group 2. ADRs were reported in 80 patients overall (59.2-65.0% across groups), most commonly mild eyelash growth (22.4-42.5%) and mild conjunctival hyperaemia (28.6-30.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sepetaprost, with or without timolol, demonstrated good tolerability and may represent an efficacious long-term treatment option for OAG or OHT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"940-948"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13452872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-026-01351-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of sepetaprost, a novel dual FP/EP3 receptor agonist, in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).

Study design: ANGEL-J2 (NCT05503901) was a phase 3, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study across 20 sites in Japan.

Methods: Adult patients with IOP ≥16 and <22 mmHg were assigned to once-daily sepetaprost 0.002% (Group 1), whereas patients with IOP ≥22 and ≤34 mmHg were randomised 1:1 to once-daily sepetaprost 0.002% alone (Group 2) and with twice-daily timolol 0.5% (Group 3). Over 52 weeks of treatment, efficacy was assessed as the change in mean diurnal IOP from baseline; safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

Results: In total, 131 patients were assigned to Group 1 (n=49), Group 2 (n=42), or Group 3 (n=40). In each group, treatment was associated with rapid and sustained reductions in IOP versus baseline (p<0.0001 at all time-points). Mean (± standard error) change in diurnal IOP from baseline at week 52 was -4.40±0.24, -6.38±0.32, and -7.51±0.29 mmHg in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; similarly, mixed model for repeated measures analyses found that reductions in mean diurnal IOP over 52 weeks were greater in Group 3 versus Group 2. ADRs were reported in 80 patients overall (59.2-65.0% across groups), most commonly mild eyelash growth (22.4-42.5%) and mild conjunctival hyperaemia (28.6-30.6%).

Conclusion: Sepetaprost, with or without timolol, demonstrated good tolerability and may represent an efficacious long-term treatment option for OAG or OHT.

sepetaprost联合或不联合替莫洛尔治疗开角型青光眼或高眼压患者的长期安全性和有效性:来自随机3期ANGEL-J2研究的结果
目的:评价新型FP/EP3受体双激动剂sepetaprost在开角型青光眼(OAG)或高眼压(OHT)患者中的长期安全性和降低眼压(IOP)的疗效。研究设计:ANGEL-J2 (NCT05503901)是一项在日本20个地点进行的随机、平行组、开放标签的3期研究。方法:IOP≥16的成人患者。结果:131例患者被分为1组(n=49)、2组(n=42)和3组(n=40)。在每一组中,治疗均与IOP较基线水平的快速和持续降低相关(结论:Sepetaprost与替莫洛尔或不与替莫洛尔联合使用,表现出良好的耐受性,可能是OAG或OHT的有效长期治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书