Patch Test Reactions to Dental Materials: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Contact Dermatitis Pub Date : 2026-09-08 Epub Date: 2026-06-16 DOI:10.1111/cod.70205
Mojca Bizjak-Suran, Manca Marčun, Mitja Košnik, Dejan Dinevski
{"title":"Patch Test Reactions to Dental Materials: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study","authors":"Mojca Bizjak-Suran,&nbsp;Manca Marčun,&nbsp;Mitja Košnik,&nbsp;Dejan Dinevski","doi":"10.1111/cod.70205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patch testing is used when delayed-type hypersensitivity to dental materials is suspected, but no European baseline series exists for patients with suspected allergy to dental materials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To describe patch test positivity to a 24-allergen dental series, assess the added yield of late readings at D6/7 and characterise methacrylate reactivity patterns.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this retrospective single-centre study, 439 adults referred between 2016 and 2025 for suspected allergy to dental materials were patch tested with an institutional 24-allergen dental series comprising 11 metals, 8 methacrylates and 5 other substances. Reactions were read on D3 and D6/7 and scored by ICDRG criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 50.1% of patients had at least one positive reaction, and 41.0% had a positive metal reaction. Nickel (23.0%) and palladium (16.6%) were the most frequent allergens. Amongst methacrylates, HEMA (3.6%), HPMA (3.0%) and EGDMA (2.5%) were most frequent. Amongst methacrylate-positive patients, 44.4% had two or more positive reactions, 40.7% were HEMA-negative and 14.8% were HEMA-negative but HPMA-positive. Across all allergens, 19.8% of positive reactions were detectable only at D6/7, corresponding to a 24.7% relative increase in detection compared with D3 alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Late readings improved detection, and methacrylate reactivity was not fully captured by HEMA alone.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"95 4","pages":"386-395"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.70205","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cod.70205","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patch testing is used when delayed-type hypersensitivity to dental materials is suspected, but no European baseline series exists for patients with suspected allergy to dental materials.

Objectives

To describe patch test positivity to a 24-allergen dental series, assess the added yield of late readings at D6/7 and characterise methacrylate reactivity patterns.

Methods

In this retrospective single-centre study, 439 adults referred between 2016 and 2025 for suspected allergy to dental materials were patch tested with an institutional 24-allergen dental series comprising 11 metals, 8 methacrylates and 5 other substances. Reactions were read on D3 and D6/7 and scored by ICDRG criteria.

Results

Overall, 50.1% of patients had at least one positive reaction, and 41.0% had a positive metal reaction. Nickel (23.0%) and palladium (16.6%) were the most frequent allergens. Amongst methacrylates, HEMA (3.6%), HPMA (3.0%) and EGDMA (2.5%) were most frequent. Amongst methacrylate-positive patients, 44.4% had two or more positive reactions, 40.7% were HEMA-negative and 14.8% were HEMA-negative but HPMA-positive. Across all allergens, 19.8% of positive reactions were detectable only at D6/7, corresponding to a 24.7% relative increase in detection compared with D3 alone.

Conclusions

Late readings improved detection, and methacrylate reactivity was not fully captured by HEMA alone.

贴片试验对牙科材料的反应:一项回顾性单中心研究。
背景:当怀疑对牙科材料有迟发性超敏反应时,使用斑贴试验,但对于怀疑对牙科材料过敏的患者,没有欧洲基线系列。目的:描述24种过敏原牙科系列的斑贴试验阳性,评估D6/7后期读数的增加产量,并表征甲基丙烯酸酯的反应模式。方法:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,2016年至2025年期间,439名疑似对牙科材料过敏的成年人接受了24种过敏原牙科系列的贴片测试,其中包括11种金属、8种甲基丙烯酸酯和5种其他物质。在D3和D6/7上阅读反应,并按ICDRG标准评分。结果:总体而言,50.1%的患者至少出现一次阳性反应,41.0%的患者出现金属阳性反应。镍(23.0%)和钯(16.6%)是最常见的过敏原。甲基丙烯酸酯中以HEMA(3.6%)、HPMA(3.0%)和EGDMA(2.5%)最为常见。在甲基丙烯酸酯阳性患者中,有两种或两种以上阳性反应的占44.4%,hema阴性的占40.7%,hema阴性但hpma阳性的占14.8%。在所有过敏原中,19.8%的阳性反应仅在D6/7检测到,与单独D3相比,检测相对增加24.7%。结论:较晚的读数改善了检测,仅靠HEMA不能完全捕获甲基丙烯酸酯的反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
30.90%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contact Dermatitis is designed primarily as a journal for clinicians who are interested in various aspects of environmental dermatitis. This includes both allergic and irritant (toxic) types of contact dermatitis, occupational (industrial) dermatitis and consumers" dermatitis from such products as cosmetics and toiletries. The journal aims at promoting and maintaining communication among dermatologists, industrial physicians, allergists and clinical immunologists, as well as chemists and research workers involved in industry and the production of consumer goods. Papers are invited on clinical observations, diagnosis and methods of investigation of patients, therapeutic measures, organisation and legislation relating to the control of occupational and consumers".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书