Determinants of nurses' knowledge on maggot debridement therapy: influence of demographic, professional, and educational factors in a Malaysian teaching hospital.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Soon Lean Keng, Wong Mong Khim, Azlina Yusuf
{"title":"Determinants of nurses' knowledge on maggot debridement therapy: influence of demographic, professional, and educational factors in a Malaysian teaching hospital.","authors":"Soon Lean Keng, Wong Mong Khim, Azlina Yusuf","doi":"10.1186/s12906-026-05435-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maggot debridement therapy (MDT) is a biotherapeutic approach that uses sterile larvae to remove necrotic tissue and promote wound healing. Although its effectiveness in managing chronic wounds is well established, clinical adoption remains limited. Nurses are central to wound care, yet little is known about their MDT knowledge in Malaysia. This study assesses nurses' knowledge of MDT and examined the influence of demographic, professional, and educational factors within a tertiary teaching hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 165 nurses selected through random sampling. Data were collected using a validated self-administered questionnaire assessing sociodemographic data, professional experience, and MDT knowledge. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data, and Pearson chi square and Fisher's Exact test were applied to determine associations between knowledge levels and key variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 32.72 years. Of these, 41.8% had 6-10 years of experience, 89.7% held a nursing diploma, and 87.9% had heard of MDT. Only 26.1% demonstrated high knowledge, while 52.7% showed low knowledge. A significant association was found between knowledge level and having heard of MDT (p = 0.040) and having performed MDT (p = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses demonstrated limited knowledge and practical experience in Maggot Debridement Therapy despite general awareness of its clinical value. Knowledge was significantly associated with prior exposure and hands-on experience, underscoring the importance of experiential learning. Incorporating MDT into nursing curricula, continuous professional development, and institutional protocols is crucial to enhance evidence-based wound care and clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13495225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-026-05435-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maggot debridement therapy (MDT) is a biotherapeutic approach that uses sterile larvae to remove necrotic tissue and promote wound healing. Although its effectiveness in managing chronic wounds is well established, clinical adoption remains limited. Nurses are central to wound care, yet little is known about their MDT knowledge in Malaysia. This study assesses nurses' knowledge of MDT and examined the influence of demographic, professional, and educational factors within a tertiary teaching hospital setting.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 165 nurses selected through random sampling. Data were collected using a validated self-administered questionnaire assessing sociodemographic data, professional experience, and MDT knowledge. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data, and Pearson chi square and Fisher's Exact test were applied to determine associations between knowledge levels and key variables.

Results: The mean age of participants was 32.72 years. Of these, 41.8% had 6-10 years of experience, 89.7% held a nursing diploma, and 87.9% had heard of MDT. Only 26.1% demonstrated high knowledge, while 52.7% showed low knowledge. A significant association was found between knowledge level and having heard of MDT (p = 0.040) and having performed MDT (p = 0.025).

Conclusion: Nurses demonstrated limited knowledge and practical experience in Maggot Debridement Therapy despite general awareness of its clinical value. Knowledge was significantly associated with prior exposure and hands-on experience, underscoring the importance of experiential learning. Incorporating MDT into nursing curricula, continuous professional development, and institutional protocols is crucial to enhance evidence-based wound care and clinical adoption.

马来西亚一家教学医院护士对蛆虫清创治疗知识的决定因素:人口统计学、专业和教育因素的影响
背景:蛆清创疗法(MDT)是一种利用无菌幼虫去除坏死组织,促进伤口愈合的生物治疗方法。虽然它在治疗慢性伤口方面的有效性已得到证实,但临床应用仍然有限。护士是伤口护理的核心,但在马来西亚,人们对护士的MDT知识知之甚少。本研究评估护士的MDT知识,并检查人口、专业和教育因素在三级教学医院设置的影响。方法:采用随机抽样的方法对165名护士进行横断面调查。数据收集使用有效的自我管理问卷评估社会人口统计数据,专业经验和MDT知识。描述性统计用于汇总数据,Pearson卡方检验和Fisher精确检验用于确定知识水平与关键变量之间的关联。结果:参与者平均年龄32.72岁。其中41.8%有6-10年护理经验,89.7%有护理文凭,87.9%听说过MDT。知识水平高的学生占26.1%,知识水平低的学生占52.7%。知识水平与听说MDT (p = 0.040)和实施MDT (p = 0.025)之间存在显著相关性。结论:护士对蛆虫清创治疗的临床价值有一定认识,但其知识和实践经验有限。知识与先前的接触和实践经验显著相关,强调了体验式学习的重要性。将MDT纳入护理课程,持续的专业发展和机构协议对于加强循证伤口护理和临床采用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书