The Primary Sources of Interruptions Experienced by Physicians and Nurses in Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.8 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-19 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.22037/aaem.v14i1.2919
Navaz Emadi, Rita Mojtahedzadeh, Seyyed Farshad Allameh, Kamal Basiri, Aeen Mohammadi
{"title":"The Primary Sources of Interruptions Experienced by Physicians and Nurses in Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Navaz Emadi, Rita Mojtahedzadeh, Seyyed Farshad Allameh, Kamal Basiri, Aeen Mohammadi","doi":"10.22037/aaem.v14i1.2919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interruptions are common in emergency departments (ED) and frequently occur during critical clinical tasks. These interruptions disrupt workflow, reduce situational awareness, increase the risk of errors, and may compromise patient safety. Identifying and mapping their sources is therefore essential to guide targeted strategies and improve the quality of care. This scoping review aimed to identify and categorize the primary sources of work-related interruptions among physicians and nurses in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review question, developed using the PCC framework (physicians and nurses; work-related interruptions; EDs), sought to identify the primary sources of interruptions in ED settings. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to locate peer-reviewed studies published up to September 2025. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Reported interruption rates varied across settings and professional roles. The primary sources of interruptions were grouped into six major categories: colleague interference, phone and pager alerts, patient-initiated interruptions, family or companion interference, technical failures and lack of resources, and environmental noise. Most interruptions occurred at nursing or physician workstations and during medication preparation, documentation, or direct patient care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of the main sources of interruptions in ED. Understanding where and why these interruptions occur can guide the development of targeted educational, organizational, and environmental interventions. Reducing avoidable interruptions may enhance staff performance, improve patient safety, and optimize the quality of emergency care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"e11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13265070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v14i1.2919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Interruptions are common in emergency departments (ED) and frequently occur during critical clinical tasks. These interruptions disrupt workflow, reduce situational awareness, increase the risk of errors, and may compromise patient safety. Identifying and mapping their sources is therefore essential to guide targeted strategies and improve the quality of care. This scoping review aimed to identify and categorize the primary sources of work-related interruptions among physicians and nurses in the ED.

Methods: The review question, developed using the PCC framework (physicians and nurses; work-related interruptions; EDs), sought to identify the primary sources of interruptions in ED settings. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to locate peer-reviewed studies published up to September 2025. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted the data.

Results: A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Reported interruption rates varied across settings and professional roles. The primary sources of interruptions were grouped into six major categories: colleague interference, phone and pager alerts, patient-initiated interruptions, family or companion interference, technical failures and lack of resources, and environmental noise. Most interruptions occurred at nursing or physician workstations and during medication preparation, documentation, or direct patient care.

Conclusion: This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of the main sources of interruptions in ED. Understanding where and why these interruptions occur can guide the development of targeted educational, organizational, and environmental interventions. Reducing avoidable interruptions may enhance staff performance, improve patient safety, and optimize the quality of emergency care.

急诊科医生和护士经历的干扰的主要来源:范围审查。
简介:中断在急诊科(ED)很常见,并且经常发生在关键的临床任务中。这些中断破坏了工作流程,降低了态势感知,增加了出错的风险,并可能危及患者安全。因此,确定和绘制其来源对于指导有针对性的战略和提高护理质量至关重要。本综述旨在确定和分类急诊科医生和护士工作中断的主要来源。方法:使用PCC框架(医生和护士;工作中断;急诊科)制定的综述问题,旨在确定急诊科环境中工作中断的主要来源。在PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar中进行了全面的搜索,以找到截至2025年9月发表的同行评议研究。两名审稿人独立筛选研究并提取数据。结果:共有12项研究符合纳入标准。报告的中断率因环境和专业角色而异。干扰的主要来源被分为六大类:同事干扰、电话和寻呼机警报、患者发起的干扰、家人或伴侣的干扰、技术故障和缺乏资源,以及环境噪音。大多数中断发生在护理或医生工作站、药物准备、文件编制或直接患者护理期间。结论:该范围综述提供了ED中断的主要来源的全面概述。了解这些中断发生的位置和原因可以指导有针对性的教育、组织和环境干预措施的发展。减少可避免的中断可以提高工作人员的绩效,改善患者的安全,并优化急诊护理的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书