Vertical farming as a land sparing strategy: GHG implications for UK agricultural landscapes.

Michael Gargaro, Kaiwen Li, Richard J Murphy, Astley Hastings, Zoe M Harris
{"title":"Vertical farming as a land sparing strategy: GHG implications for UK agricultural landscapes.","authors":"Michael Gargaro, Kaiwen Li, Richard J Murphy, Astley Hastings, Zoe M Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.clfs.2026.100037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Growing pressure on UK land, driven by demands for food production, renewable energy, biodiversity recovery and climate mitigation, is intensifying competition for limited land. Vertical farming (VF) offers a land-sparing strategy: by relocating crop production indoors and achieving extremely high yields per unit area, VF can free agricultural land for other uses. However, VF has high greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to traditional field farming due to intensive electricity demand, so its environmental value depends on whether land-sparing outcomes can offset production-stage impacts. This study provides the first UK-wide, full-system assessment of lettuce production, comparing business-as-usual field farming with national-scale VF and alternative uses of spared land. A primary-data life cycle assessment (LCA) quantifies the impacts of VF; a separate primary-data LCA of field farming incorporates DNDC-modelled national soil emissions; and the Land Use Net-Zero Advisor (LUNA) evaluates the GHG, land-carbon and energy implications of repurposing spared land for solar, wind, afforestation, agroforestry and bioenergy. VF reduces land demand by 93% but has higher GHG emissions per-kg than field systems. System-level outcomes depend on how spared land is used. Solar energy provides the strongest mitigation, fully offsetting VF's operational emissions and reducing total system impacts below the field baseline. Forestry and agroforestry generate positive land-carbon outcomes but more modest GHG reductions. Across all scenarios, peat soils dominate land-carbon losses, underscoring the need to avoid land-use change on peat and prioritise restoration. Overall, VF's environmental value arises from the land-use transitions it enables. When incorporated into multifunctional land-use planning, VF can support domestic food production while facilitating renewable-energy deployment and ecosystem restoration within a highly constrained UK land system.</p>","PeriodicalId":523895,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner food systems","volume":"3 ","pages":"None"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13256068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner food systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clfs.2026.100037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing pressure on UK land, driven by demands for food production, renewable energy, biodiversity recovery and climate mitigation, is intensifying competition for limited land. Vertical farming (VF) offers a land-sparing strategy: by relocating crop production indoors and achieving extremely high yields per unit area, VF can free agricultural land for other uses. However, VF has high greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to traditional field farming due to intensive electricity demand, so its environmental value depends on whether land-sparing outcomes can offset production-stage impacts. This study provides the first UK-wide, full-system assessment of lettuce production, comparing business-as-usual field farming with national-scale VF and alternative uses of spared land. A primary-data life cycle assessment (LCA) quantifies the impacts of VF; a separate primary-data LCA of field farming incorporates DNDC-modelled national soil emissions; and the Land Use Net-Zero Advisor (LUNA) evaluates the GHG, land-carbon and energy implications of repurposing spared land for solar, wind, afforestation, agroforestry and bioenergy. VF reduces land demand by 93% but has higher GHG emissions per-kg than field systems. System-level outcomes depend on how spared land is used. Solar energy provides the strongest mitigation, fully offsetting VF's operational emissions and reducing total system impacts below the field baseline. Forestry and agroforestry generate positive land-carbon outcomes but more modest GHG reductions. Across all scenarios, peat soils dominate land-carbon losses, underscoring the need to avoid land-use change on peat and prioritise restoration. Overall, VF's environmental value arises from the land-use transitions it enables. When incorporated into multifunctional land-use planning, VF can support domestic food production while facilitating renewable-energy deployment and ecosystem restoration within a highly constrained UK land system.

垂直农业作为土地节约策略:温室气体对英国农业景观的影响。
在粮食生产、可再生能源、生物多样性恢复和气候缓解需求的推动下,英国土地面临越来越大的压力,这加剧了对有限土地的竞争。垂直农业(VF)提供了一种节省土地的策略:通过将作物生产转移到室内,并实现极高的单位面积产量,垂直农业可以腾出农业用地作其他用途。然而,由于电力需求密集,与传统的田间耕作相比,VF的温室气体排放量较高,因此其环境价值取决于节约土地的结果能否抵消生产阶段的影响。这项研究提供了英国范围内的第一个生菜生产的全系统评估,比较了常规的田间耕作与全国规模的VF和备用土地的替代用途。原始数据生命周期评估(LCA)量化了VF的影响;田间耕作的单独原始数据LCA纳入了dndc模拟的国家土壤排放;土地使用净零顾问(LUNA)评估将闲置土地重新用于太阳能、风能、造林、农林业和生物能源对温室气体、土地碳和能源的影响。VF减少了93%的土地需求,但每公斤温室气体排放量高于田间系统。系统层面的结果取决于闲置土地的利用方式。太阳能提供了最强的缓解,完全抵消了VF的运行排放,并将整个系统的影响降低到现场基线以下。林业和农林业产生了积极的土地碳成果,但温室气体减排更为温和。在所有情景中,泥炭土壤主导着土地碳损失,这强调了避免泥炭土地利用变化和优先恢复的必要性。总的来说,VF的环境价值来自于它所能实现的土地利用转变。当纳入多功能土地利用规划时,VF可以支持国内粮食生产,同时在高度受限的英国土地系统内促进可再生能源的部署和生态系统的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书