A web-based two-stage prediction model for postoperative pulmonary complications using preoperative and intraoperative data.

Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine Pub Date : 2026-06-03 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jatmed.2026.03.009
Anran Dai, Hao Liu, Yuqi Dai, Po Shen, Jian Chen, Jiayong Zhang, Chen Chen, Yuping Hu, Yanna Si, Jianjun Zou
{"title":"A web-based two-stage prediction model for postoperative pulmonary complications using preoperative and intraoperative data.","authors":"Anran Dai, Hao Liu, Yuqi Dai, Po Shen, Jian Chen, Jiayong Zhang, Chen Chen, Yuping Hu, Yanna Si, Jianjun Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.jatmed.2026.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most existing models for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) rely solely on preoperative variables and lack integration of intraoperative data or clinical tools for application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study developed and externally validated logistic regression and machine learning (ML) models for predicting PPCs in non-cardiothoracic surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia. A cohort of 997 patients was randomly divided into training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio. The stepwise regression method was adopted to conduct feature screening on the preoperative dataset and the combined preoperative and intraoperative dataset, and a variety of ML algorithm models were developed. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), brier score, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. External validation was performed on an independent cohort of 286 patients from a different institution. The features of the optimized model were interpreted by introducing SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AUROC value of the logistic regression model using only preoperative variables in the test set was 0.828. After including intraoperative variables, the CatBoost model demonstrated superior performance, with an AUROC value of 0.927. In the preoperative model, C-reactive protein (CRP), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, age, and smoking status were the most significant predictors. However, operative duration, CRP, age, and intraoperative blood loss were the dominant predictors of postoperative outcomes. External validation confirmed general applicability, with preoperative logistic regression and the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia Tool (ARISCAT) yielding AUROC values of 0.827 and 0.796, respectively. The postoperative CatBoost model achieved an AUROC of 0.865, AUPRC of 0.809, sensitivity of 0.787, specificity of 0.921, and the lowest Brier score (0.132).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preoperative model enabled early risk stratification, while the postoperative model provided improved accuracy. A publicly accessible web-based calculator was developed to support clinical implementation and facilitate prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":519929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine","volume":"5 2","pages":"104-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13254958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jatmed.2026.03.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most existing models for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) rely solely on preoperative variables and lack integration of intraoperative data or clinical tools for application.

Methods: This study developed and externally validated logistic regression and machine learning (ML) models for predicting PPCs in non-cardiothoracic surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia. A cohort of 997 patients was randomly divided into training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio. The stepwise regression method was adopted to conduct feature screening on the preoperative dataset and the combined preoperative and intraoperative dataset, and a variety of ML algorithm models were developed. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), brier score, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. External validation was performed on an independent cohort of 286 patients from a different institution. The features of the optimized model were interpreted by introducing SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.

Results: The AUROC value of the logistic regression model using only preoperative variables in the test set was 0.828. After including intraoperative variables, the CatBoost model demonstrated superior performance, with an AUROC value of 0.927. In the preoperative model, C-reactive protein (CRP), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, age, and smoking status were the most significant predictors. However, operative duration, CRP, age, and intraoperative blood loss were the dominant predictors of postoperative outcomes. External validation confirmed general applicability, with preoperative logistic regression and the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia Tool (ARISCAT) yielding AUROC values of 0.827 and 0.796, respectively. The postoperative CatBoost model achieved an AUROC of 0.865, AUPRC of 0.809, sensitivity of 0.787, specificity of 0.921, and the lowest Brier score (0.132).

Conclusions: The preoperative model enabled early risk stratification, while the postoperative model provided improved accuracy. A publicly accessible web-based calculator was developed to support clinical implementation and facilitate prospective validation.

基于网络的基于术前和术中数据的术后肺部并发症两阶段预测模型。
背景:大多数预测术后肺部并发症(PPCs)的现有模型仅依赖于术前变量,缺乏术中数据的整合或临床工具的应用。方法:本研究建立了预测全身麻醉非心胸外科患者PPCs的逻辑回归和机器学习(ML)模型,并进行了外部验证。997例患者按7:3的比例随机分为训练组和测试组。采用逐步回归方法对术前数据集和术前术中联合数据集进行特征筛选,并开发了多种ML算法模型。采用受试者工作特征下面积(AUROC)、精确召回曲线下面积(AUPRC)、brier评分、灵敏度、特异性、精度和f1评分来评估模型的性能。外部验证在来自不同机构的286名患者的独立队列中进行。引入SHapley加性解释(SHAP)方法对优化模型的特征进行了解释。结果:检验集中仅使用术前变量的logistic回归模型的AUROC值为0.828。在纳入术中变量后,CatBoost模型表现出更好的性能,AUROC值为0.927。在术前模型中,c反应蛋白(CRP)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的身体状态分类、年龄和吸烟状况是最重要的预测因素。然而,手术时间、CRP、年龄和术中出血量是术后预后的主要预测因素。外部验证证实了该方法的一般适用性,术前logistic回归和加泰罗尼亚工具评估手术患者呼吸风险(ARISCAT)的AUROC值分别为0.827和0.796。术后CatBoost模型AUROC为0.865,AUPRC为0.809,敏感性为0.787,特异性为0.921,最低Brier评分为0.132。结论:术前模型实现了早期风险分层,而术后模型提高了准确性。开发了一个可公开访问的基于网络的计算器,以支持临床实施并促进前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书