Anna Konstant, Zihao Zhu, Yin Li, Yu Hen Hu, Robert G Radwin
{"title":"Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.","authors":"Anna Konstant, Zihao Zhu, Yin Li, Yu Hen Hu, Robert G Radwin","doi":"10.1177/00187208261460709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveSanding strategies were identified that correlated with better performance and less physical stress.BackgroundSanding requires manual skill because of the dexterity and perceptual needs to perform the job well, and it involves exposure to physical stresses.MethodsForce and tool kinematics were measured using an instrumented platform and motion capture for 20 participants while performing a timed paint removal sanding task in the laboratory. Performance was based on the quantity and uniformity of the paint removed and measured using image processing. The ACGIH Threshold Limit Value (TLV) for Hand Activity Level Peak Force Index was used to evaluate physical stress.ResultsLinear regression and machine learning algorithms revealed that high performers (above the 75th percentile) moved the sander more, while they varied but applied greater force compared to the low performers (below the 25th percentile). Some high performers could maintain a TLV below the acceptable limit by pausing more and applying less force but performing more frequent exertions.ConclusionsMore force, greater variations of force, and speed were related to better sanding performance, while less force and more frequent exertions and pauses helped reduce physical stress.ApplicationsStrategies identified in this study may be useful for training operators in sanding tasks for performance and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208261460709"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261460709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveSanding strategies were identified that correlated with better performance and less physical stress.BackgroundSanding requires manual skill because of the dexterity and perceptual needs to perform the job well, and it involves exposure to physical stresses.MethodsForce and tool kinematics were measured using an instrumented platform and motion capture for 20 participants while performing a timed paint removal sanding task in the laboratory. Performance was based on the quantity and uniformity of the paint removed and measured using image processing. The ACGIH Threshold Limit Value (TLV) for Hand Activity Level Peak Force Index was used to evaluate physical stress.ResultsLinear regression and machine learning algorithms revealed that high performers (above the 75th percentile) moved the sander more, while they varied but applied greater force compared to the low performers (below the 25th percentile). Some high performers could maintain a TLV below the acceptable limit by pausing more and applying less force but performing more frequent exertions.ConclusionsMore force, greater variations of force, and speed were related to better sanding performance, while less force and more frequent exertions and pauses helped reduce physical stress.ApplicationsStrategies identified in this study may be useful for training operators in sanding tasks for performance and safety.
期刊介绍:
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.