Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Anna Konstant, Zihao Zhu, Yin Li, Yu Hen Hu, Robert G Radwin
{"title":"Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.","authors":"Anna Konstant, Zihao Zhu, Yin Li, Yu Hen Hu, Robert G Radwin","doi":"10.1177/00187208261460709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveSanding strategies were identified that correlated with better performance and less physical stress.BackgroundSanding requires manual skill because of the dexterity and perceptual needs to perform the job well, and it involves exposure to physical stresses.MethodsForce and tool kinematics were measured using an instrumented platform and motion capture for 20 participants while performing a timed paint removal sanding task in the laboratory. Performance was based on the quantity and uniformity of the paint removed and measured using image processing. The ACGIH Threshold Limit Value (TLV) for Hand Activity Level Peak Force Index was used to evaluate physical stress.ResultsLinear regression and machine learning algorithms revealed that high performers (above the 75th percentile) moved the sander more, while they varied but applied greater force compared to the low performers (below the 25th percentile). Some high performers could maintain a TLV below the acceptable limit by pausing more and applying less force but performing more frequent exertions.ConclusionsMore force, greater variations of force, and speed were related to better sanding performance, while less force and more frequent exertions and pauses helped reduce physical stress.ApplicationsStrategies identified in this study may be useful for training operators in sanding tasks for performance and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208261460709"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261460709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveSanding strategies were identified that correlated with better performance and less physical stress.BackgroundSanding requires manual skill because of the dexterity and perceptual needs to perform the job well, and it involves exposure to physical stresses.MethodsForce and tool kinematics were measured using an instrumented platform and motion capture for 20 participants while performing a timed paint removal sanding task in the laboratory. Performance was based on the quantity and uniformity of the paint removed and measured using image processing. The ACGIH Threshold Limit Value (TLV) for Hand Activity Level Peak Force Index was used to evaluate physical stress.ResultsLinear regression and machine learning algorithms revealed that high performers (above the 75th percentile) moved the sander more, while they varied but applied greater force compared to the low performers (below the 25th percentile). Some high performers could maintain a TLV below the acceptable limit by pausing more and applying less force but performing more frequent exertions.ConclusionsMore force, greater variations of force, and speed were related to better sanding performance, while less force and more frequent exertions and pauses helped reduce physical stress.ApplicationsStrategies identified in this study may be useful for training operators in sanding tasks for performance and safety.

在打磨任务中建模人类专业知识。
目的探讨与提高运动成绩和减轻身体压力相关的运动策略。打磨需要手工技能,因为要做好这项工作需要灵巧和感性,而且它涉及暴露在身体压力下。方法使用仪器平台和运动捕捉技术测量20名参与者在实验室执行定时除漆打磨任务时的受力和工具运动学。性能是基于去除的油漆的数量和均匀性,并使用图像处理来测量。采用ACGIH手部活动水平峰值力指数阈值(TLV)评价物理应力。结果线性回归和机器学习算法显示,与表现不佳的(低于25个百分位数)相比,表现优异的(高于75个百分位数)移动磨砂机的次数更多,虽然它们变化很大,但施加的力更大。一些高水平的运动员可以通过更多的暂停和施加更少的力来保持TLV低于可接受的极限,但要进行更频繁的用力。结论更大的力,更大的力变化和速度与更好的打磨性能有关,而更小的力和更频繁的用力和暂停有助于减少身体压力。本研究中确定的策略可能有助于培训操作人员进行磨砂作业的性能和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书