Race and ethnicity in the courtroom workgroup: Can diversifying the court solve racial and ethnic disparities in case outcomes?

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Law and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-15 DOI:10.1037/lhb0000658
Rachel Bowman, Ojmarrh Mitchell, Daniela Oramas Mora, Lyndsay Boggess
{"title":"Race and ethnicity in the courtroom workgroup: Can diversifying the court solve racial and ethnic disparities in case outcomes?","authors":"Rachel Bowman, Ojmarrh Mitchell, Daniela Oramas Mora, Lyndsay Boggess","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Racial and ethnic disparities in criminal court outcomes in the United States are a persistent problem, one that is often attributed to the considerable discretion court actors have in determining whether, and to what extent, to punish criminal defendants. To reduce unwarranted disparities and overzealous sanctioning in U.S. courts, many have called for increasing the diversity of the court workforce. This article empirically examines the effects of workgroup diversity on court outcomes.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>We hypothesize that more racially and ethnically diverse courtroom workgroups will (a) be less punitive overall and (b) produce smaller racial and ethnic disparities in case outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a sample of felony cases processed in Florida's Circuit Courts in 2017 (<i>N</i> = 10,202), we estimated a direct and interactive multinomial logistic regression model of pretrial and sentencing outcomes (case declination, diversion, transfer, withhold adjudication, probation, jail, and prison) with clustered standard errors to account for the nested nature of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that, although the majority of routine court actors in our sample were White, there was variation in case outcomes by workgroup diversity with more racially and ethnically diverse workgroups being, on average, less punitive than more homogenously White workgroups. However, the relationship between workgroup diversity and the severity of pretrial and sentencing outcomes operated differently for Black and Hispanic defendants. While Hispanic defendants tended to fare worse-in probation and jail decisions-in workgroups with a larger proportion of Hispanic court actors, Black defendants were more likely to be spared prison time in workgroups with a larger proportion of Black court actors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the importance of disentangling race from ethnicity in understanding the impact of workgroup diversity on criminal case outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"482-499"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000658","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Racial and ethnic disparities in criminal court outcomes in the United States are a persistent problem, one that is often attributed to the considerable discretion court actors have in determining whether, and to what extent, to punish criminal defendants. To reduce unwarranted disparities and overzealous sanctioning in U.S. courts, many have called for increasing the diversity of the court workforce. This article empirically examines the effects of workgroup diversity on court outcomes.

Hypotheses: We hypothesize that more racially and ethnically diverse courtroom workgroups will (a) be less punitive overall and (b) produce smaller racial and ethnic disparities in case outcomes.

Method: Using a sample of felony cases processed in Florida's Circuit Courts in 2017 (N = 10,202), we estimated a direct and interactive multinomial logistic regression model of pretrial and sentencing outcomes (case declination, diversion, transfer, withhold adjudication, probation, jail, and prison) with clustered standard errors to account for the nested nature of the data.

Results: We found that, although the majority of routine court actors in our sample were White, there was variation in case outcomes by workgroup diversity with more racially and ethnically diverse workgroups being, on average, less punitive than more homogenously White workgroups. However, the relationship between workgroup diversity and the severity of pretrial and sentencing outcomes operated differently for Black and Hispanic defendants. While Hispanic defendants tended to fare worse-in probation and jail decisions-in workgroups with a larger proportion of Hispanic court actors, Black defendants were more likely to be spared prison time in workgroups with a larger proportion of Black court actors.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of disentangling race from ethnicity in understanding the impact of workgroup diversity on criminal case outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

法庭工作小组中的种族和民族:多样化的法庭能解决案件结果中的种族和民族差异吗?
目的:美国刑事法庭结果中的种族和民族差异是一个长期存在的问题,这通常归因于法院行为者在决定是否以及在何种程度上惩罚刑事被告方面具有相当大的自由裁量权。为了减少美国法院不必要的差异和过度的制裁,许多人呼吁增加法院工作人员的多样性。本文实证研究了工作组多样性对法院结果的影响。假设:我们假设,更多的种族和民族多样化的法庭工作组将(a)总体上惩罚更少,(b)在案件结果中产生更小的种族和民族差异。方法:使用2017年佛罗里达州巡回法院处理的重罪案件样本(N = 10,202),我们估计了审前和量刑结果(案件拒绝,转移,转移,暂缓判决,缓刑,监禁和监禁)的直接和交互式多项逻辑回归模型,并具有聚类标准误差,以解释数据的嵌套性质。结果:我们发现,尽管我们样本中的大多数常规法庭行为者是白人,但由于工作小组的多样性,案件结果也有所不同,平均而言,种族和民族更多样化的工作小组比更同质的白人工作小组惩罚更少。然而,在黑人和西班牙裔被告中,工作组多样性与审前和量刑结果严重性之间的关系是不同的。在西班牙裔法庭演员比例较大的工作小组中,西班牙裔被告往往在缓刑和监禁决定中表现较差,而在黑人法庭演员比例较大的工作小组中,黑人被告更有可能免于服刑。结论:我们的研究结果强调了在理解工作组多样性对刑事案件结果的影响时,将种族从民族中分离出来的重要性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Law and Human Behavior, the official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association, is a multidisciplinary forum for the publication of articles and discussions of issues arising out of the relationships between human behavior and the law, our legal system, and the legal process. This journal publishes original research, reviews of past research, and theoretical studies from professionals in criminal justice, law, psychology, sociology, psychiatry, political science, education, communication, and other areas germane to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书