David Ledingham, Antonella Macerollo, Nicola Pavese
{"title":"Essential Tremor and Digital Biomarkers: A Scoping Review Using the TRACE Framework to Map Readiness for Clinical Trials and Routine Practice.","authors":"David Ledingham, Antonella Macerollo, Nicola Pavese","doi":"10.5334/tohm.1205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Essential Tremor (ET) is the most prevalent movement disorder in adults yet remains underrepresented in digital biomarker research. As therapies evolve, the absence of validated digital endpoints represents a growing translational gap. We introduce TRACE (Technology Readiness And Clinical Evidence), a novel five-tier validation maturity framework, and apply it in a scoping review of the ET digital biomarker literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-ScR scoping review was conducted across four databases (2000-2025). Studies were eligible if they reported quantitative digital tremor measurement in ten or more ET participants. Each study was assigned to the highest satisfied TRACE tier: technical verification (T1), referenced clinical validity (T2), ambulatory and longitudinal utility (T3), clinical trial readiness (T4), or economic and implementation readiness (T5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-five studies were included: wearable inertial measurement units (n = 114), digitised handwriting (n = 16), computer vision (n = 15), surface EMG (n = 10), voice (n = 6), and gait (n = 4). One hundred and fifty-four (93%) were T2; nine T3; two T4, both deploying the Cala Health TAPS wristband; none T5. Home or ambulatory deployment was present in 13 studies, minimum detectable change data in three, and patient-reported outcome correlation in 11.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Only 11 studies across two modalities were classified beyond T2, demonstrating ambulatory or longitudinal evidence beyond supervised clinical validation; the TAPS wristband is the sole platform to achieve Tier 4. Home deployment, minimum detectable change derivation anchored to patient experience, and patient-reported outcome integration remain key prerequisites before digital tremor metrics can function as trial endpoints or inform routine practice.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Despite rapid advances in digital outcome measures for Parkinson's disease, essential tremor remains largely overlooked. Reviewing 165 studies across six sensing modalities, we introduce TRACE, a five-tier validation framework, and find that while 93% of devices demonstrate basic clinical validity, only two achieve clinical trial readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23317,"journal":{"name":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","volume":"16 ","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13262646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.1205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Essential Tremor (ET) is the most prevalent movement disorder in adults yet remains underrepresented in digital biomarker research. As therapies evolve, the absence of validated digital endpoints represents a growing translational gap. We introduce TRACE (Technology Readiness And Clinical Evidence), a novel five-tier validation maturity framework, and apply it in a scoping review of the ET digital biomarker literature.
Methods: A PRISMA-ScR scoping review was conducted across four databases (2000-2025). Studies were eligible if they reported quantitative digital tremor measurement in ten or more ET participants. Each study was assigned to the highest satisfied TRACE tier: technical verification (T1), referenced clinical validity (T2), ambulatory and longitudinal utility (T3), clinical trial readiness (T4), or economic and implementation readiness (T5).
Results: One hundred and sixty-five studies were included: wearable inertial measurement units (n = 114), digitised handwriting (n = 16), computer vision (n = 15), surface EMG (n = 10), voice (n = 6), and gait (n = 4). One hundred and fifty-four (93%) were T2; nine T3; two T4, both deploying the Cala Health TAPS wristband; none T5. Home or ambulatory deployment was present in 13 studies, minimum detectable change data in three, and patient-reported outcome correlation in 11.
Discussion: Only 11 studies across two modalities were classified beyond T2, demonstrating ambulatory or longitudinal evidence beyond supervised clinical validation; the TAPS wristband is the sole platform to achieve Tier 4. Home deployment, minimum detectable change derivation anchored to patient experience, and patient-reported outcome integration remain key prerequisites before digital tremor metrics can function as trial endpoints or inform routine practice.
Highlights: Despite rapid advances in digital outcome measures for Parkinson's disease, essential tremor remains largely overlooked. Reviewing 165 studies across six sensing modalities, we introduce TRACE, a five-tier validation framework, and find that while 93% of devices demonstrate basic clinical validity, only two achieve clinical trial readiness.