Essential Tremor and Digital Biomarkers: A Scoping Review Using the TRACE Framework to Map Readiness for Clinical Trials and Routine Practice.

IF 1.9 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements Pub Date : 2026-06-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.5334/tohm.1205
David Ledingham, Antonella Macerollo, Nicola Pavese
{"title":"Essential Tremor and Digital Biomarkers: A Scoping Review Using the TRACE Framework to Map Readiness for Clinical Trials and Routine Practice.","authors":"David Ledingham, Antonella Macerollo, Nicola Pavese","doi":"10.5334/tohm.1205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Essential Tremor (ET) is the most prevalent movement disorder in adults yet remains underrepresented in digital biomarker research. As therapies evolve, the absence of validated digital endpoints represents a growing translational gap. We introduce TRACE (Technology Readiness And Clinical Evidence), a novel five-tier validation maturity framework, and apply it in a scoping review of the ET digital biomarker literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-ScR scoping review was conducted across four databases (2000-2025). Studies were eligible if they reported quantitative digital tremor measurement in ten or more ET participants. Each study was assigned to the highest satisfied TRACE tier: technical verification (T1), referenced clinical validity (T2), ambulatory and longitudinal utility (T3), clinical trial readiness (T4), or economic and implementation readiness (T5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-five studies were included: wearable inertial measurement units (n = 114), digitised handwriting (n = 16), computer vision (n = 15), surface EMG (n = 10), voice (n = 6), and gait (n = 4). One hundred and fifty-four (93%) were T2; nine T3; two T4, both deploying the Cala Health TAPS wristband; none T5. Home or ambulatory deployment was present in 13 studies, minimum detectable change data in three, and patient-reported outcome correlation in 11.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Only 11 studies across two modalities were classified beyond T2, demonstrating ambulatory or longitudinal evidence beyond supervised clinical validation; the TAPS wristband is the sole platform to achieve Tier 4. Home deployment, minimum detectable change derivation anchored to patient experience, and patient-reported outcome integration remain key prerequisites before digital tremor metrics can function as trial endpoints or inform routine practice.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Despite rapid advances in digital outcome measures for Parkinson's disease, essential tremor remains largely overlooked. Reviewing 165 studies across six sensing modalities, we introduce TRACE, a five-tier validation framework, and find that while 93% of devices demonstrate basic clinical validity, only two achieve clinical trial readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23317,"journal":{"name":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","volume":"16 ","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13262646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.1205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Essential Tremor (ET) is the most prevalent movement disorder in adults yet remains underrepresented in digital biomarker research. As therapies evolve, the absence of validated digital endpoints represents a growing translational gap. We introduce TRACE (Technology Readiness And Clinical Evidence), a novel five-tier validation maturity framework, and apply it in a scoping review of the ET digital biomarker literature.

Methods: A PRISMA-ScR scoping review was conducted across four databases (2000-2025). Studies were eligible if they reported quantitative digital tremor measurement in ten or more ET participants. Each study was assigned to the highest satisfied TRACE tier: technical verification (T1), referenced clinical validity (T2), ambulatory and longitudinal utility (T3), clinical trial readiness (T4), or economic and implementation readiness (T5).

Results: One hundred and sixty-five studies were included: wearable inertial measurement units (n = 114), digitised handwriting (n = 16), computer vision (n = 15), surface EMG (n = 10), voice (n = 6), and gait (n = 4). One hundred and fifty-four (93%) were T2; nine T3; two T4, both deploying the Cala Health TAPS wristband; none T5. Home or ambulatory deployment was present in 13 studies, minimum detectable change data in three, and patient-reported outcome correlation in 11.

Discussion: Only 11 studies across two modalities were classified beyond T2, demonstrating ambulatory or longitudinal evidence beyond supervised clinical validation; the TAPS wristband is the sole platform to achieve Tier 4. Home deployment, minimum detectable change derivation anchored to patient experience, and patient-reported outcome integration remain key prerequisites before digital tremor metrics can function as trial endpoints or inform routine practice.

Highlights: Despite rapid advances in digital outcome measures for Parkinson's disease, essential tremor remains largely overlooked. Reviewing 165 studies across six sensing modalities, we introduce TRACE, a five-tier validation framework, and find that while 93% of devices demonstrate basic clinical validity, only two achieve clinical trial readiness.

特发性震颤和数字生物标志物:使用TRACE框架对临床试验和常规实践准备情况进行范围审查。
背景:特发性震颤(ET)是成人中最常见的运动障碍,但在数字生物标志物研究中仍未得到充分代表。随着治疗方法的发展,缺乏经过验证的数字终点代表着越来越大的翻译差距。我们介绍了TRACE(技术准备和临床证据),这是一个新的五层验证成熟度框架,并将其应用于ET数字生物标志物文献的范围审查。方法:对四个数据库(2000-2025)进行prism - scr范围审查。如果研究报告了10个或更多ET参与者的定量数字震颤测量,则该研究是合格的。每个研究被分配到最高满意的TRACE级别:技术验证(T1)、参考临床效度(T2)、动态和纵向效用(T3)、临床试验准备(T4)或经济和实施准备(T5)。结果:共纳入165项研究:可穿戴式惯性测量装置(n = 114)、数字化手写(n = 16)、计算机视觉(n = 15)、体表肌电(n = 10)、语音(n = 6)和步态(n = 4)。T2 154例(93%);九个T3;两个T4,都配备了Cala Health TAPS腕带;T5。13项研究中有家庭或门诊部署,3项研究中有最小可检测到的变化数据,11项研究中有患者报告的结果相关。讨论:只有11项研究跨越两种模式被分类为T2以上,证明了超越监督临床验证的动态或纵向证据;TAPS腕带是实现Tier 4的唯一平台。家庭部署、基于患者经验的最小可检测变化推导和患者报告的结果整合仍然是数字震颤指标作为试验终点或告知常规实践之前的关键先决条件。重点:尽管帕金森病的数字结果测量快速发展,特发性震颤在很大程度上仍然被忽视。回顾了六种传感模式的165项研究,我们引入了TRACE,一个五层验证框架,发现虽然93%的设备表现出基本的临床有效性,但只有两个达到了临床试验准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书