Effect of Anesthetic Agents on Middle Ear Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Saudi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-08 DOI:10.15537/1658-3175.8799
Nasser Almujaiwel, Reem Alkublan, Latifah Almakoshi
{"title":"Effect of Anesthetic Agents on Middle Ear Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Nasser Almujaiwel, Reem Alkublan, Latifah Almakoshi","doi":"10.15537/1658-3175.8799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess and compare the effects of these agents on middle ear pressure (MEP). Anesthetic agents can significantly alter MEP, which is a critical factor in middle ear surgeries that require stability to prevent complications. Different anesthetics, including inhalational and intravenous agents, have varying effects on MEP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus, following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies that evaluated MEP changes before and after anesthesia using tympanometry were included. Relevant data, such as anesthetic type, patient demographics, MEP measurements, and reported complications, were extracted. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted to account for variability across studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies, including 980 patients aged 2-76 years, were analyzed. Desflurane caused the most significant increase in the MEP. Isoflurane showed minimal changes in MEP, making it a safer option for middle-ear surgery. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol maintained stable MEP, highlighting its suitability for these procedures. Nitrous oxide decreased MEP postoperatively but posed risks during the early phases of administration, especially in patients with eustachian tube dysfunctions. Dexmedetomidine significantly elevated MEP, while halothane, alone or combined with nitrous oxide, had negligible effects on MEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study reveal that isoflurane and TIVA with propofol are suitable anesthetic options for middle ear surgery due to their minimal impact on MEPs. In contrast, desflurane and sevoflurane should be used cautiously because they can significantly elevate MEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":21453,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Medical Journal","volume":"47 7","pages":"1115-1123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13264156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15537/1658-3175.8799","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess and compare the effects of these agents on middle ear pressure (MEP). Anesthetic agents can significantly alter MEP, which is a critical factor in middle ear surgeries that require stability to prevent complications. Different anesthetics, including inhalational and intravenous agents, have varying effects on MEP.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus, following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies that evaluated MEP changes before and after anesthesia using tympanometry were included. Relevant data, such as anesthetic type, patient demographics, MEP measurements, and reported complications, were extracted. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted to account for variability across studies.

Results: Twelve studies, including 980 patients aged 2-76 years, were analyzed. Desflurane caused the most significant increase in the MEP. Isoflurane showed minimal changes in MEP, making it a safer option for middle-ear surgery. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol maintained stable MEP, highlighting its suitability for these procedures. Nitrous oxide decreased MEP postoperatively but posed risks during the early phases of administration, especially in patients with eustachian tube dysfunctions. Dexmedetomidine significantly elevated MEP, while halothane, alone or combined with nitrous oxide, had negligible effects on MEP.

Conclusion: The findings of this study reveal that isoflurane and TIVA with propofol are suitable anesthetic options for middle ear surgery due to their minimal impact on MEPs. In contrast, desflurane and sevoflurane should be used cautiously because they can significantly elevate MEP.

麻醉药对中耳压的影响:系统回顾和meta分析。
目的:评价和比较这些药物对中耳压(MEP)的影响。麻醉剂可以显著改变MEP,这是中耳手术中需要稳定性以防止并发症的关键因素。不同的麻醉剂,包括吸入剂和静脉注射剂,对MEP有不同的影响。方法:在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Scopus中进行系统检索,遵循系统评价和元分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。使用鼓室测量法评估麻醉前后MEP变化的研究也包括在内。提取相关数据,如麻醉类型、患者人口统计学、MEP测量和报告的并发症。使用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析,以解释研究之间的可变性。结果:共纳入12项研究,980例患者,年龄2-76岁。地氟醚引起的MEP增加最为显著。异氟醚对MEP的影响很小,使其成为中耳手术更安全的选择。异丙酚全静脉麻醉(TIVA)维持稳定的MEP,突出了其在这些手术中的适用性。氧化亚氮降低了术后MEP,但在给药早期存在风险,特别是对咽鼓管功能障碍的患者。右美托咪定显著提高MEP,而氟烷单独使用或与氧化亚氮联合使用对MEP的影响可以忽略不计。结论:本研究结果表明,异氟醚和TIVA联合异丙酚对mep的影响最小,是中耳手术的合适麻醉选择。地氟醚和七氟醚可显著提高MEP,应谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Medical Journal
Saudi Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
203
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Saudi Medical Journal is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal. It is an open access journal, with content released under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommercial license. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, Systematic Reviews, Case Reports, Brief Communication, Brief Report, Clinical Note, Clinical Image, Editorials, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Student Corner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书