Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Lisfranc Fixation via Articular Bridge Plating Combined With the Suture Tape Ligament Reconstruction Technique.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-06-09 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114261449243
Matthew Sun, Sophia Padovano, Tanita Botha, Sasha Roshan-Zamir
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Lisfranc Fixation via Articular Bridge Plating Combined With the Suture Tape Ligament Reconstruction Technique.","authors":"Matthew Sun, Sophia Padovano, Tanita Botha, Sasha Roshan-Zamir","doi":"10.1177/24730114261449243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lisfranc injuries are challenging presentations frequently encountered by foot and ankle and trauma surgeons, with no definitive consensus regarding the optimal fixation technique. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified stabilisation technique combining tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) bridge plating with a suture tape-endobutton construct for Lisfranc joint stabilisation, using patient-reported outcomes in a cohort of patients with acute injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on 20 consecutive patients with acute Lisfranc injuries treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Fixation involved TMTJ bridge plating and stabilisation of the Lisfranc interval using a suture tape-endobutton construct spanning the medial cuneiform (C1) and the base of the second metatarsal (M2). All patients underwent planned removal of bridge plates with retainment of the suture tape construct. Pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scores were collected, along with postoperative complication and reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort comprised 9 males (45%) and 11 females (55%). Time to surgery ranged from 1.5 to 12 weeks. Mean follow-up was 31.8 months (range 12-61 months). At final follow-up, 18 of 19 patients (95%) who exercised preoperatively reported return to regular exercise or sporting activity. Mean AOFAS scores improved from 32.1 ± 19.9 preoperatively to 90.6 ± 9.4 postoperatively, and VAS scores improved from 6.2 ± 2.2 to 1.6 ± 0.8. There were no cases of unplanned reoperation, recurrent radiographic diastasis, or conversion to arthrodesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study of combined TMTJ bridge plating and suture tape ligament augmentation provides preliminary evidence of safety and efficacy for acute Lisfranc injuries in a small retrospective series. It appears to be a safe and effective technique for acute Lisfranc injuries, demonstrating favorable patient-reported outcomes and maintenance of reduction at intermediate follow-up. The suture tape construct minimises transarticular instrumentation and may reduce iatrogenic articular injury, potentially lowering the risk of midfoot stiffness, pain, and posttraumatic arthrosis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"11 2","pages":"24730114261449243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13254419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114261449243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lisfranc injuries are challenging presentations frequently encountered by foot and ankle and trauma surgeons, with no definitive consensus regarding the optimal fixation technique. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified stabilisation technique combining tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) bridge plating with a suture tape-endobutton construct for Lisfranc joint stabilisation, using patient-reported outcomes in a cohort of patients with acute injuries.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 20 consecutive patients with acute Lisfranc injuries treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Fixation involved TMTJ bridge plating and stabilisation of the Lisfranc interval using a suture tape-endobutton construct spanning the medial cuneiform (C1) and the base of the second metatarsal (M2). All patients underwent planned removal of bridge plates with retainment of the suture tape construct. Pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scores were collected, along with postoperative complication and reoperation rates.

Results: The cohort comprised 9 males (45%) and 11 females (55%). Time to surgery ranged from 1.5 to 12 weeks. Mean follow-up was 31.8 months (range 12-61 months). At final follow-up, 18 of 19 patients (95%) who exercised preoperatively reported return to regular exercise or sporting activity. Mean AOFAS scores improved from 32.1 ± 19.9 preoperatively to 90.6 ± 9.4 postoperatively, and VAS scores improved from 6.2 ± 2.2 to 1.6 ± 0.8. There were no cases of unplanned reoperation, recurrent radiographic diastasis, or conversion to arthrodesis.

Conclusion: Our study of combined TMTJ bridge plating and suture tape ligament augmentation provides preliminary evidence of safety and efficacy for acute Lisfranc injuries in a small retrospective series. It appears to be a safe and effective technique for acute Lisfranc injuries, demonstrating favorable patient-reported outcomes and maintenance of reduction at intermediate follow-up. The suture tape construct minimises transarticular instrumentation and may reduce iatrogenic articular injury, potentially lowering the risk of midfoot stiffness, pain, and posttraumatic arthrosis.

Level of evidence: Level IV, case series.

患者报告的通过关节桥钢板联合缝合带韧带重建技术进行Lisfranc固定的结果。
背景:Lisfranc损伤是足部、踝关节和创伤外科医生经常遇到的具有挑战性的表现,关于最佳固定技术没有明确的共识。本研究旨在评估改良的稳定技术结合跗跖关节(TMTJ)桥板与缝合带-内扣结构用于Lisfranc关节稳定的安全性和有效性,使用患者报告的急性损伤患者队列结果。方法:对20例连续行切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗的急性Lisfranc损伤患者进行回顾性分析。固定包括TMTJ桥钢板和使用跨越内侧楔形骨(C1)和第二跖骨(M2)底部的缝合带-内扣结构固定Lisfranc间段。所有患者均在保留缝合带结构的情况下计划拆除桥板。收集术前和术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)和美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)中足评分,以及术后并发症和再手术率。结果:该队列包括9名男性(45%)和11名女性(55%)。手术时间从1.5到12周不等。平均随访31.8个月(12-61个月)。在最后的随访中,术前锻炼的19例患者中有18例(95%)报告恢复了常规锻炼或体育活动。平均AOFAS评分由术前的32.1±19.9分提高到术后的90.6±9.4分,VAS评分由6.2±2.2分提高到1.6±0.8分。没有意外的再手术,复发的影像学转移,或转向关节融合术的病例。结论:我们对TMTJ桥板联合缝合带韧带增强的研究为急性Lisfranc损伤的安全性和有效性提供了初步的证据。它似乎是一种安全有效的治疗急性Lisfranc损伤的技术,在中期随访中显示出良好的患者报告结果和复位维持。缝合带结构最大限度地减少了经关节内固定,并可能减少医源性关节损伤,潜在地降低足中部僵硬、疼痛和创伤后关节病的风险。证据等级:四级,案例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书