{"title":"Defensive antinociception and antipredatory responses in prey threatened by distinct odoriferous cues from Felis silvestris catus.","authors":"Moe Yamashita, Priscila Medeiros, Ohana Turcato Macacare, Yara Bezerra de Paiva, Audrey Franceschi Biagioni, Norberto Cysne Coimbra","doi":"10.1037/bne0000657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fear, an adaptive response to danger situation, is vital for the survival of both human beings and rodents. Predator odor-related cues and contextual fear work as valuable models for studying neurobiological circuits, providing insights into unconditioned and conditioned fear-related behavioral and physiological responses, including fear-related antinociception. This study investigated whether a fear paradigm based on predator odor cues could trigger the defensive antinociceptive phenomenon. Our findings indicate that while both the exposure to different predator odor cues and the re-exposure to the experimental context elicit similar defensive behaviors, such as the head-out response (an inhibitory avoidance behavior), only the exposure to the predator odor cues induced defensive antinociception. Notably, during the re-exposure to the experimental context, the endogenous pain modulatory system is not recruited, suggesting that defensive antinociception is not universally elicited by all fear-related reactions. Instead, defensive antinociception appears to be modulated by distinct neural circuits and olfactory perception-dependent mechanisms that adjust dynamically according to threat imminence. Thus, antinociception emerges as part of the immediate defensive response to a threatening odor cue, rather than as a consequence of fear memory retrieval. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":8739,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"267-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fear, an adaptive response to danger situation, is vital for the survival of both human beings and rodents. Predator odor-related cues and contextual fear work as valuable models for studying neurobiological circuits, providing insights into unconditioned and conditioned fear-related behavioral and physiological responses, including fear-related antinociception. This study investigated whether a fear paradigm based on predator odor cues could trigger the defensive antinociceptive phenomenon. Our findings indicate that while both the exposure to different predator odor cues and the re-exposure to the experimental context elicit similar defensive behaviors, such as the head-out response (an inhibitory avoidance behavior), only the exposure to the predator odor cues induced defensive antinociception. Notably, during the re-exposure to the experimental context, the endogenous pain modulatory system is not recruited, suggesting that defensive antinociception is not universally elicited by all fear-related reactions. Instead, defensive antinociception appears to be modulated by distinct neural circuits and olfactory perception-dependent mechanisms that adjust dynamically according to threat imminence. Thus, antinociception emerges as part of the immediate defensive response to a threatening odor cue, rather than as a consequence of fear memory retrieval. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).