Biological sex and normative cognitive aging across spatial learning, flexibility, and working memory in Fischer 344 rats.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioral neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-15 DOI:10.1037/bne0000656
Zahra Faghihi, David J Horovitz, Lori A Newman, Peter J Vento, Joseph A McQuail
{"title":"Biological sex and normative cognitive aging across spatial learning, flexibility, and working memory in Fischer 344 rats.","authors":"Zahra Faghihi, David J Horovitz, Lori A Newman, Peter J Vento, Joseph A McQuail","doi":"10.1037/bne0000656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aging is associated with decline in spatial learning, cognitive flexibility, and working memory, yet the extent to which biological sex modulates changes in cognitive function remains unresolved. While sex differences are evident in pathological brain aging, sparse insights from healthy aging populations suggest that sex effects on cognition are modest and domain specific. To systematically test effects of biological sex across the lifespan on specific aspects of cognitive function, we examined age- and sex-related changes in spatial cognition in a large cohort of Fischer 344 rats (<i>N</i> = 373), including young (4-8 months), middle-aged (12-16 months), and older aged (22-26 months) males and females. Rats were assessed on spatial reference learning, reversal learning, and working memory versions of the Morris water maze, with performance quantified using proximity-based measures, providing sensitive, individualized indices of spatial learning. Across all tasks, age accounted for the largest proportion of variance, with older rats exhibiting impairments in spatial learning, flexibility, and working memory relative to young adults. In contrast, effects of sex or interactions with age were limited to certain aspects of performance and were substantially smaller relative to age and training effects. Specifically, a female-specific association between spatial reference memory and reversal learning was observed despite comparable overall performance. Performance on visible-platform control trials did not indicate gross sensorimotor impairments that would account for age-related spatial deficits. Together, findings demonstrate age is the primary determinant of spatial cognitive decline under normative conditions, while sex-related influences, if present, are subtle and task dependent. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":8739,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"255-266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13271161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aging is associated with decline in spatial learning, cognitive flexibility, and working memory, yet the extent to which biological sex modulates changes in cognitive function remains unresolved. While sex differences are evident in pathological brain aging, sparse insights from healthy aging populations suggest that sex effects on cognition are modest and domain specific. To systematically test effects of biological sex across the lifespan on specific aspects of cognitive function, we examined age- and sex-related changes in spatial cognition in a large cohort of Fischer 344 rats (N = 373), including young (4-8 months), middle-aged (12-16 months), and older aged (22-26 months) males and females. Rats were assessed on spatial reference learning, reversal learning, and working memory versions of the Morris water maze, with performance quantified using proximity-based measures, providing sensitive, individualized indices of spatial learning. Across all tasks, age accounted for the largest proportion of variance, with older rats exhibiting impairments in spatial learning, flexibility, and working memory relative to young adults. In contrast, effects of sex or interactions with age were limited to certain aspects of performance and were substantially smaller relative to age and training effects. Specifically, a female-specific association between spatial reference memory and reversal learning was observed despite comparable overall performance. Performance on visible-platform control trials did not indicate gross sensorimotor impairments that would account for age-related spatial deficits. Together, findings demonstrate age is the primary determinant of spatial cognitive decline under normative conditions, while sex-related influences, if present, are subtle and task dependent. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Fischer 344大鼠空间学习、灵活性和工作记忆的生理性别和规范性认知老化。
衰老与空间学习能力、认知灵活性和工作记忆能力的下降有关,但生物性别在多大程度上调节认知功能的变化仍未得到解决。尽管性别差异在病理性脑衰老中很明显,但来自健康老龄化人群的稀疏见解表明,性别对认知的影响是适度的,并且是特定领域的。为了系统地测试生理性别对认知功能特定方面的影响,我们研究了Fischer 344大鼠(N = 373)在空间认知方面的年龄和性别相关变化,包括年轻(4-8个月)、中年(12-16个月)和老年(22-26个月)雄性和雌性。大鼠在Morris水迷宫的空间参考学习、逆向学习和工作记忆方面进行了评估,并使用基于接近度的测量方法对其表现进行了量化,提供了敏感的、个性化的空间学习指标。在所有任务中,年龄占最大比例的差异,与年轻人相比,年龄较大的大鼠在空间学习、灵活性和工作记忆方面表现出损伤。相比之下,性别或与年龄的相互作用的影响仅限于表现的某些方面,相对于年龄和训练的影响要小得多。具体来说,尽管整体表现相当,但在空间参考记忆和反转学习之间观察到女性特有的关联。在可视平台对照试验中的表现并未显示出与年龄相关的空间缺陷相关的严重感觉运动障碍。总之,研究结果表明,在规范条件下,年龄是空间认知能力下降的主要决定因素,而与性别相关的影响,如果存在,则是微妙的,并且依赖于任务。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral neuroscience
Behavioral neuroscience 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Neuroscience publishes original research articles as well as reviews in the broad field of the neural bases of behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书