Advancing Forest Fire Susceptibility Mapping in the Eastern Mediterranean Using Multi-Algorithm Machine Learning

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hazem Ghassan Abdo, Sahar Mohammed Richi, Saeed Alqadhi, Pankaj Prasad, Okan Mert Katipoğlu, Thong Nguyen-Huy, Jayanta Das, Hussein Almohamad, Javed Mallick
{"title":"Advancing Forest Fire Susceptibility Mapping in the Eastern Mediterranean Using Multi-Algorithm Machine Learning","authors":"Hazem Ghassan Abdo,&nbsp;Sahar Mohammed Richi,&nbsp;Saeed Alqadhi,&nbsp;Pankaj Prasad,&nbsp;Okan Mert Katipoğlu,&nbsp;Thong Nguyen-Huy,&nbsp;Jayanta Das,&nbsp;Hussein Almohamad,&nbsp;Javed Mallick","doi":"10.1007/s10694-026-01930-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forest fires are among the most severe natural hazards threatening ecological sustainability in the Eastern Mediterranean, with Syria being a prominent example where ongoing conflict has undermined forest management and monitoring systems. Despite numerous global studies on forest fire susceptibility, conflict-affected areas in the Eastern Mediterranean remain underrepresented in the scientific literature due to limited data and complex environmental and social conditions. In particular, few studies have systematically compared multiple machine learning algorithms for predicting forest fire susceptibility in these regions. To address this gap, this study evaluates the performance of six machine learning algorithms—Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Linear Regression (LR)—using 3,589 fire events and 13 conditioning factors in the Latakia governorate, western Syria. Results indicate excellent predictive performance for all models, with XGBoost achieving the highest AUC of 0.993, followed by RF (0.992), KNN (0.977), MLP (0.975), SVM (0.968), and LR (0.963). These findings provide a robust basis for supporting fire management and mitigation strategies in Syria and offer insights applicable to other conflict-affected regions of the Eastern Mediterranean.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":558,"journal":{"name":"Fire Technology","volume":"62 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-026-01930-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest fires are among the most severe natural hazards threatening ecological sustainability in the Eastern Mediterranean, with Syria being a prominent example where ongoing conflict has undermined forest management and monitoring systems. Despite numerous global studies on forest fire susceptibility, conflict-affected areas in the Eastern Mediterranean remain underrepresented in the scientific literature due to limited data and complex environmental and social conditions. In particular, few studies have systematically compared multiple machine learning algorithms for predicting forest fire susceptibility in these regions. To address this gap, this study evaluates the performance of six machine learning algorithms—Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Linear Regression (LR)—using 3,589 fire events and 13 conditioning factors in the Latakia governorate, western Syria. Results indicate excellent predictive performance for all models, with XGBoost achieving the highest AUC of 0.993, followed by RF (0.992), KNN (0.977), MLP (0.975), SVM (0.968), and LR (0.963). These findings provide a robust basis for supporting fire management and mitigation strategies in Syria and offer insights applicable to other conflict-affected regions of the Eastern Mediterranean.

利用多算法机器学习推进东地中海森林火灾易感度制图
森林火灾是威胁地中海东部生态可持续性的最严重自然灾害之一,叙利亚就是一个突出的例子,持续的冲突破坏了森林管理和监测系统。尽管有许多关于森林火灾易感性的全球研究,但由于数据有限以及复杂的环境和社会条件,东地中海受冲突影响地区在科学文献中的代表性仍然不足。特别是,很少有研究系统地比较了这些地区预测森林火灾易感性的多种机器学习算法。为了解决这一差距,本研究评估了六种机器学习算法的性能——极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、多层感知器(MLP)、k近邻(KNN)和线性回归(LR)——利用叙利亚西部拉塔基亚省的3589起火灾事件和13个条件反射因素。结果表明,所有模型的预测性能都很好,其中XGBoost的AUC最高,为0.993,其次是RF(0.992)、KNN(0.977)、MLP(0.975)、SVM(0.968)和LR(0.963)。这些发现为支持叙利亚的火灾管理和减灾战略提供了坚实的基础,并提供了适用于东地中海其他受冲突影响地区的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fire Technology
Fire Technology 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Fire Technology publishes original contributions, both theoretical and empirical, that contribute to the solution of problems in fire safety science and engineering. It is the leading journal in the field, publishing applied research dealing with the full range of actual and potential fire hazards facing humans and the environment. It covers the entire domain of fire safety science and engineering problems relevant in industrial, operational, cultural, and environmental applications, including modeling, testing, detection, suppression, human behavior, wildfires, structures, and risk analysis. The aim of Fire Technology is to push forward the frontiers of knowledge and technology by encouraging interdisciplinary communication of significant technical developments in fire protection and subjects of scientific interest to the fire protection community at large. It is published in conjunction with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE). The mission of NFPA is to help save lives and reduce loss with information, knowledge, and passion. The mission of SFPE is advancing the science and practice of fire protection engineering internationally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书