Alexander Stacul MSc , Ezra Valido MD, PhD , Nicole Nyfeler MSc , Alessandro Bertolo PhD , Ramona M. Zeh PhD , Andrea O. Fontana MD, PhD , Jürgen Pannek MD , Jörg Krebs PhD , Alexander Leichtle MD , Marija Glisic PhD , Jivko Stoyanov PhD
{"title":"Precision Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Omics Applications for Intervention Monitoring in Spinal Cord Injury","authors":"Alexander Stacul MSc , Ezra Valido MD, PhD , Nicole Nyfeler MSc , Alessandro Bertolo PhD , Ramona M. Zeh PhD , Andrea O. Fontana MD, PhD , Jürgen Pannek MD , Jörg Krebs PhD , Alexander Leichtle MD , Marija Glisic PhD , Jivko Stoyanov PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2026.100598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically evaluate the application and utility of omics technologies, high-throughput methods measuring the complete or targeted set of molecules inside a biological system at a certain timepoint, in monitoring and optimizing rehabilitation interventions in traumatic spinal cord injury.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Embase, Medline/Ovid, and Web of Science were searched from inception to November 27, 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) with spinal cord injury undergoing rehabilitation interventions assessed using omics technologies (genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, or metagenomics).</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Following PRISMA guidelines, independent screening, data extraction, and risk of bias (RoB) assessment (National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tools) were performed by 2 investigators. Based on RoB assessment, studies were classified from level 1 (most reliable) to level 4 (least reliable).</div></div><div><h3>Data synthesis</h3><div>Twenty-three trials were included: 8 randomized controlled trials, 5 non-randomized controlled trials, and 10 pre-post trials. Twenty-two studies (96%) exhibit a moderate RoB due to small sample size and heterogeneity. Omics technologies were primarily applied to exercise and electrical muscle stimulation interventions (65%), followed by hormonal and cellular therapies (22%), and diet (13%). Transcriptomic analyses revealed consistent molecular adaptations, including increased mitochondrial biogenesis (proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha) and reduced muscle atrophy gene expression (myostatin), correlating with enhanced insulin sensitivity and improved aerobic capacity. Metagenomics consistently identified microbiome shifts, such as decreased inflammatory taxa and increased beneficial taxa, associated with improved metabolic profiles and bowel function. Proteomics and metabolomics highlighted systemic changes related to neurorecovery, immune modulation, and sperm motility, linking molecular signatures directly to clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Omics technologies enable early identification of molecular alterations. However, given small sample sizes and heterogeneity of the current studies, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Gradual integration of omics, particularly epigenomics which may capture long-term, injury-related changes holds promise for developing personalized rehabilitation protocols and monitoring clinical progression in spinal cord injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"8 2","pages":"Article 100598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109526000157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To systematically evaluate the application and utility of omics technologies, high-throughput methods measuring the complete or targeted set of molecules inside a biological system at a certain timepoint, in monitoring and optimizing rehabilitation interventions in traumatic spinal cord injury.
Data sources
Embase, Medline/Ovid, and Web of Science were searched from inception to November 27, 2024.
Study Selection
Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) with spinal cord injury undergoing rehabilitation interventions assessed using omics technologies (genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, or metagenomics).
Data Extraction
Following PRISMA guidelines, independent screening, data extraction, and risk of bias (RoB) assessment (National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tools) were performed by 2 investigators. Based on RoB assessment, studies were classified from level 1 (most reliable) to level 4 (least reliable).
Data synthesis
Twenty-three trials were included: 8 randomized controlled trials, 5 non-randomized controlled trials, and 10 pre-post trials. Twenty-two studies (96%) exhibit a moderate RoB due to small sample size and heterogeneity. Omics technologies were primarily applied to exercise and electrical muscle stimulation interventions (65%), followed by hormonal and cellular therapies (22%), and diet (13%). Transcriptomic analyses revealed consistent molecular adaptations, including increased mitochondrial biogenesis (proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha) and reduced muscle atrophy gene expression (myostatin), correlating with enhanced insulin sensitivity and improved aerobic capacity. Metagenomics consistently identified microbiome shifts, such as decreased inflammatory taxa and increased beneficial taxa, associated with improved metabolic profiles and bowel function. Proteomics and metabolomics highlighted systemic changes related to neurorecovery, immune modulation, and sperm motility, linking molecular signatures directly to clinical outcomes.
Conclusions
Omics technologies enable early identification of molecular alterations. However, given small sample sizes and heterogeneity of the current studies, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Gradual integration of omics, particularly epigenomics which may capture long-term, injury-related changes holds promise for developing personalized rehabilitation protocols and monitoring clinical progression in spinal cord injury.
目的系统评价组学技术在创伤性脊髓损伤康复干预监测中的应用和实用性。组学技术是一种高通量方法,可在一定时间点测量生物系统内完整或靶向的一组分子。数据来源:embase、Medline/Ovid和Web of Science从创立到2024年11月27日。研究选择符合条件的研究包括使用组学技术(基因组学、表观基因组学、转录组学、蛋白质组学、代谢组学或宏基因组学)评估的接受康复干预的脊髓损伤成人(≥18岁)。数据提取遵循PRISMA指南,由2名研究者进行独立筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险(RoB)评估(美国国家卫生质量评估工具研究所)。根据RoB评估,研究分为1级(最可靠)至4级(最不可靠)。数据综合纳入23项试验:8项随机对照试验,5项非随机对照试验,10项前后试验。22项研究(96%)由于样本量小和异质性,表现出中等程度的RoB。组学技术主要应用于运动和肌肉电刺激干预(65%),其次是激素和细胞治疗(22%)和饮食(13%)。转录组学分析揭示了一致的分子适应,包括线粒体生物发生增加(增殖激活受体γ辅激活因子1- α)和肌肉萎缩基因表达减少(肌肉生长抑制素),与胰岛素敏感性增强和有氧能力改善相关。宏基因组学一致地确定了微生物组的变化,例如炎症类群的减少和有益类群的增加,与代谢谱和肠道功能的改善有关。蛋白质组学和代谢组学强调了与神经恢复、免疫调节和精子活力相关的系统性变化,将分子特征直接与临床结果联系起来。结论somics技术可以早期识别分子改变。然而,考虑到目前研究的样本量小和异质性,这些发现应该谨慎解释。逐渐整合组学,特别是表观基因组学,可以捕获长期的损伤相关变化,为开发个性化康复方案和监测脊髓损伤的临床进展提供了希望。