Value of nailfold capillaroscopy in the classification of the systemic sclerosis pattern

Medicina clinica (English ed.) Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.medcle.2026.107426
Alfredo Guillén del Castillo , Gema M. Lledó-Ibáñez , Luis Sáez Comet , Mayka Freire Dapena , Miguel Mesa Navas , Miguel Martín Cascón , Carmen Pilar Simeon , Elena Martinez Robles , José Todolí Parra , Diana Cristina Varela , Clara Udaondo Gascon , Génesis Maldonado , Juan Manuel Mosquera Angarita , Adela Marín , Laura Pérez Abad , Eduardo Ramos Ibáñez , Borja del Carmelo Gracia Tello
{"title":"Value of nailfold capillaroscopy in the classification of the systemic sclerosis pattern","authors":"Alfredo Guillén del Castillo ,&nbsp;Gema M. Lledó-Ibáñez ,&nbsp;Luis Sáez Comet ,&nbsp;Mayka Freire Dapena ,&nbsp;Miguel Mesa Navas ,&nbsp;Miguel Martín Cascón ,&nbsp;Carmen Pilar Simeon ,&nbsp;Elena Martinez Robles ,&nbsp;José Todolí Parra ,&nbsp;Diana Cristina Varela ,&nbsp;Clara Udaondo Gascon ,&nbsp;Génesis Maldonado ,&nbsp;Juan Manuel Mosquera Angarita ,&nbsp;Adela Marín ,&nbsp;Laura Pérez Abad ,&nbsp;Eduardo Ramos Ibáñez ,&nbsp;Borja del Carmelo Gracia Tello","doi":"10.1016/j.medcle.2026.107426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) is the gold-standard to identify scleroderma patterns. Our aim was to establish the minimum requirements; number of fingers, length of nailbed samples, location of nailbed areas, to diagnose the existence of systemic sclerosis patterns (SSc-P) and further identify non-SSc-P and SSc-P subtypes reliably.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>NVCs were taken during routine explorations by capillaroscopists from 12 hospitals, who made four diagnosis per patient according to the examination of the following: 32 images (4 images/finger, mean 59.43<!--> <!-->mm); 16 images (2 medial images/finger [mean 29.28<!--> <!-->mm]); 8 images (1 medial image/finger [mean 14.50<!--> <!-->mm]); 4 images (1 medial image per middle fingers [mean 7.22<!--> <!-->mm]). Diagnosis matches and discrepancies considering 32 versus 16, 8 or 4 images, were calculated, with the goal of estimating the information loss when not covering the whole nailbed. The same analysis was performed using the CAPI-Score and CAPI-Detect algorithms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2,387 NVCs were used. Disagreement in pattern assignment was 26.7%, 36.6% and 41.5% when the analysis was performed over 16, 8 or 4 images, respectively. When 16 images were used, 18.5% of expert observers changed their assigned pattern in 18.5% of cases from SSc-P to non-SSc-P, and &gt;30% of patients diagnosed were assigned a different subtype. Although to a lesser extent, diagnosis discrepancies were observed when CAPI-Score and CAPI-Detect algorithms were applied.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>All fingers but thumbs have to be considered to identify scleroderma patterns accurately. Four nailbed areas in the analysis demonstrated to be superior than using a partial sample.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74154,"journal":{"name":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","volume":"166 6","pages":"Article 107426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S238702062600241X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) is the gold-standard to identify scleroderma patterns. Our aim was to establish the minimum requirements; number of fingers, length of nailbed samples, location of nailbed areas, to diagnose the existence of systemic sclerosis patterns (SSc-P) and further identify non-SSc-P and SSc-P subtypes reliably.

Methods

NVCs were taken during routine explorations by capillaroscopists from 12 hospitals, who made four diagnosis per patient according to the examination of the following: 32 images (4 images/finger, mean 59.43 mm); 16 images (2 medial images/finger [mean 29.28 mm]); 8 images (1 medial image/finger [mean 14.50 mm]); 4 images (1 medial image per middle fingers [mean 7.22 mm]). Diagnosis matches and discrepancies considering 32 versus 16, 8 or 4 images, were calculated, with the goal of estimating the information loss when not covering the whole nailbed. The same analysis was performed using the CAPI-Score and CAPI-Detect algorithms.

Results

A total of 2,387 NVCs were used. Disagreement in pattern assignment was 26.7%, 36.6% and 41.5% when the analysis was performed over 16, 8 or 4 images, respectively. When 16 images were used, 18.5% of expert observers changed their assigned pattern in 18.5% of cases from SSc-P to non-SSc-P, and >30% of patients diagnosed were assigned a different subtype. Although to a lesser extent, diagnosis discrepancies were observed when CAPI-Score and CAPI-Detect algorithms were applied.

Conclusion

All fingers but thumbs have to be considered to identify scleroderma patterns accurately. Four nailbed areas in the analysis demonstrated to be superior than using a partial sample.
甲襞毛细血管镜在系统性硬化症分型中的价值
目的甲襞视频毛细血管镜检查(NVC)是鉴别硬皮病类型的金标准。我们的目标是建立最低要求;指数、指甲样本长度、指甲区域位置,以诊断系统性硬化症(SSc-P)的存在,并进一步可靠地鉴定非SSc-P和SSc-P亚型。方法由12家医院的毛细管镜医师在常规探查时拍摄snvcs,每位患者根据以下检查做出4个诊断:32张图像(4张/指,平均59.43 mm);16张图像(2张内侧图像/指[平均29.28 mm]);8张图像(1张内侧图像/指[平均14.50 mm]);4张图像(每中指1张内侧图像[平均7.22 mm])。计算32张、16张、8张或4张图像的诊断匹配和差异,目的是估计未覆盖整个指甲时的信息损失。使用CAPI-Score和CAPI-Detect算法进行相同的分析。结果共使用NVCs 2387例。当分析超过16张、8张或4张图像时,模式分配的不一致性分别为26.7%、36.6%和41.5%。当使用16张图像时,18.5%的专家观察员将18.5%的SSc-P病例的分配模式更改为非SSc-P, 30%的诊断患者被分配为不同的亚型。虽然在较小程度上,当应用CAPI-Score和CAPI-Detect算法时观察到诊断差异。结论要准确识别硬皮病的类型,除大拇指外,其他手指均应考虑。在分析中,四个固定区域被证明比使用部分样本更优越。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书