Measurement Properties of the Functional Balance Ability Measure Across Subacute Neurologic Diagnoses

IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION
Jasmine J. Cash PhD , Margaret A. French PT, DPT, PhD , Craig A. Velozo PhD, OTR/L , Bryant A. Seamon PT, DPT, PhD
{"title":"Measurement Properties of the Functional Balance Ability Measure Across Subacute Neurologic Diagnoses","authors":"Jasmine J. Cash PhD ,&nbsp;Margaret A. French PT, DPT, PhD ,&nbsp;Craig A. Velozo PhD, OTR/L ,&nbsp;Bryant A. Seamon PT, DPT, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the measurement properties of the Functional Balance Ability Measure (FBAM) in people with subacute neurologic conditions using Rasch analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Inpatient rehabilitation facility.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Data from persons (N=841, 57.5±18.6y, 39% women) with a neurologic diagnosis receiving inpatient rehabilitation who had Berg Balance Scale and Functional Gait Assessment item-level scores within three days of admission.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Principal component analysis of residuals evaluated measurement unidimensionality. Rasch analysis with the Andrich Rating Scale Model was used to quantify rating scale characteristics, item difficulty hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation of the FBAM. Item difficulty hierarchy stability across 4 diagnostic groups (cerebral vascular accident, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and other nontraumatic neurologic disorders) was evaluated with differential item functioning (DIF).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The principal component analysis of residuals suggested 2 dimensions, however, disattenuated correlations indicated dimensions were not measuring different constructs and therefore supported unidimensionality. The FBAM had an appropriate rating scale structure, item difficulty hierarchy, and high person reliability (0.91). Only 5.2% of persons misfit response patterns. Two items misfit but were retained because removal caused additional item misfit. The FBAM separated persons into 6 groups of balance ability. Marginal DIF was found for the items “sitting unsupported,” “gait with vertical head turns,” and ”gait with horizontal head turns” in the other nontraumatic neurologic disorders group, and “look behind” and “pick up an object” in the spinal cord injury group. Twenty-one percent of the sample received the lowest measure value, indicating a floor effect.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The FBAM is a unidimensional and reliable measure of balance for persons with subacute neurologic injuries. DIF analyses confirmed a stable hierarchy of balance ability across mobility levels supporting the FBAM’s construct validity. Future work should address the observed floor effect.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"8 2","pages":"Article 100583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525001570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the measurement properties of the Functional Balance Ability Measure (FBAM) in people with subacute neurologic conditions using Rasch analysis.

Design

Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis.

Setting

Inpatient rehabilitation facility.

Participants

Data from persons (N=841, 57.5±18.6y, 39% women) with a neurologic diagnosis receiving inpatient rehabilitation who had Berg Balance Scale and Functional Gait Assessment item-level scores within three days of admission.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Principal component analysis of residuals evaluated measurement unidimensionality. Rasch analysis with the Andrich Rating Scale Model was used to quantify rating scale characteristics, item difficulty hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation of the FBAM. Item difficulty hierarchy stability across 4 diagnostic groups (cerebral vascular accident, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and other nontraumatic neurologic disorders) was evaluated with differential item functioning (DIF).

Results

The principal component analysis of residuals suggested 2 dimensions, however, disattenuated correlations indicated dimensions were not measuring different constructs and therefore supported unidimensionality. The FBAM had an appropriate rating scale structure, item difficulty hierarchy, and high person reliability (0.91). Only 5.2% of persons misfit response patterns. Two items misfit but were retained because removal caused additional item misfit. The FBAM separated persons into 6 groups of balance ability. Marginal DIF was found for the items “sitting unsupported,” “gait with vertical head turns,” and ”gait with horizontal head turns” in the other nontraumatic neurologic disorders group, and “look behind” and “pick up an object” in the spinal cord injury group. Twenty-one percent of the sample received the lowest measure value, indicating a floor effect.

Conclusions

The FBAM is a unidimensional and reliable measure of balance for persons with subacute neurologic injuries. DIF analyses confirmed a stable hierarchy of balance ability across mobility levels supporting the FBAM’s construct validity. Future work should address the observed floor effect.
功能平衡能力测量在亚急性神经系统疾病诊断中的测量特性
目的应用Rasch分析法评价亚急性神经系统疾病患者功能平衡能力量表(FBAM)的测量特性。设计回顾性、横断面分析。设置住院康复设施。参与者数据来自接受住院康复的神经系统诊断患者(N=841, 57.5±18.6岁,39%女性),并在入院3天内进行Berg平衡量表和功能步态评估项目水平评分。InterventionsNot适用。残差的主成分分析评价了测量的单维性。采用Andrich评定量表模型的Rasch分析法对FBAM的评定量表特征、项目难度等级、项目与人的契合度以及人的分离度进行量化。用差异项目功能(DIF)评估4个诊断组(脑血管事故、创伤性脑损伤、脊髓损伤和其他非创伤性神经障碍)的项目难度等级稳定性。结果残差的主成分分析显示为2个维度,但失衰减相关性表明维度没有测量不同的构式,因此支持单维性。量表结构合理,项目难度层次合理,个体信度高(0.91)。只有5.2%的人不符合反应模式。两个项目不匹配,但保留,因为移除造成额外的项目不匹配。FBAM根据平衡能力将人分成6组。其他非创伤性神经障碍组的“无支撑坐姿”、“头部垂直转动步态”和“头部水平转动步态”以及脊髓损伤组的“向后看”和“拿起物体”项目的DIF均为边缘DIF。21%的样本得到了最低的测量值,这表明存在地板效应。结论FBAM是测量亚急性神经损伤患者平衡性的一种单一、可靠的方法。DIF分析证实了跨迁移水平的平衡能力的稳定层次结构,支持FBAM的构念效度。未来的工作应解决观察到的地板效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书