Feasibility of Behavior Change Techniques to Promote Physical Activity of People With Acute Stroke During Hospitalization: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION
Annalena Paus , Isabelle Stickdorn , Marion Grafe , Christian Grüneberg PhD
{"title":"Feasibility of Behavior Change Techniques to Promote Physical Activity of People With Acute Stroke During Hospitalization: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Annalena Paus ,&nbsp;Isabelle Stickdorn ,&nbsp;Marion Grafe ,&nbsp;Christian Grüneberg PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the feasibility of using behavior change techniques in people with acute stroke during hospitalization and to evaluate the preliminary effects of these interventions on the physical activity and mobility of the participants.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Nonblinded, parallel-group pilot randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>The trial was conducted in a stroke unit of a university hospital in Germany.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A random sample of 24 participants (N=24) was selected. Included were people with acute stroke (&lt;48h after the incident), with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 0-5, who were able to ambulate independently.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Participants of the intervention group received 3 behavior change techniques alongside standard physiotherapy during their hospital stay: education, goal setting, and monitoring. In the control group, participants received standard physiotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Feasibility was assessed based on previously established feasibility criteria. Physical activity levels were measured using accelerometry, while mobility was evaluated with the de Morton Mobility Index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-four participants were recruited in total (participation rate: 77.4%), and 12 of them received the intervention. There were no drop-outs and none lost to follow-up (drop-out rate 0%; retention rate: 100%). The recruitment rate, retention, acceptability, and safety of the intervention were assessed as feasible. The target adherence of 80% potential wear time of an accelerometer could not be confirmed. No adverse events were reported. A trend for higher physical activity of the intervention group was observed; however, the results were not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite a small number of participants, the feasibility and safety of the use of behavior change techniques in people with acute stroke, as well as indications of a potential effect, were established. Therefore, after implementing adjustments regarding the recruitment and inclusion of participants, the recommendation can be made to conduct a definite trial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"8 2","pages":"Article 100582"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525001569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the feasibility of using behavior change techniques in people with acute stroke during hospitalization and to evaluate the preliminary effects of these interventions on the physical activity and mobility of the participants.

Design

Nonblinded, parallel-group pilot randomized controlled trial.

Setting

The trial was conducted in a stroke unit of a university hospital in Germany.

Participants

A random sample of 24 participants (N=24) was selected. Included were people with acute stroke (<48h after the incident), with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 0-5, who were able to ambulate independently.

Interventions

Participants of the intervention group received 3 behavior change techniques alongside standard physiotherapy during their hospital stay: education, goal setting, and monitoring. In the control group, participants received standard physiotherapy.

Main Outcome Measures

Feasibility was assessed based on previously established feasibility criteria. Physical activity levels were measured using accelerometry, while mobility was evaluated with the de Morton Mobility Index.

Results

Twenty-four participants were recruited in total (participation rate: 77.4%), and 12 of them received the intervention. There were no drop-outs and none lost to follow-up (drop-out rate 0%; retention rate: 100%). The recruitment rate, retention, acceptability, and safety of the intervention were assessed as feasible. The target adherence of 80% potential wear time of an accelerometer could not be confirmed. No adverse events were reported. A trend for higher physical activity of the intervention group was observed; however, the results were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Despite a small number of participants, the feasibility and safety of the use of behavior change techniques in people with acute stroke, as well as indications of a potential effect, were established. Therefore, after implementing adjustments regarding the recruitment and inclusion of participants, the recommendation can be made to conduct a definite trial.
行为改变技术促进急性中风患者住院期间身体活动的可行性:一项试点随机对照试验
目的探讨行为改变技术在急性脑卒中患者住院治疗中的可行性,并评价这些干预措施对参与者身体活动和活动能力的初步影响。设计非盲、平行组先导随机对照试验。该试验在德国一所大学医院的中风科室进行。随机抽取24名参与者(N=24)。其中包括急性中风患者(事件发生48小时后),美国国立卫生研究院中风量表评分为0-5分,能够独立行走。干预组的参与者在住院期间接受标准物理治疗的同时接受3种行为改变技术:教育、目标设定和监测。在对照组,参与者接受标准的物理治疗。根据先前建立的可行性标准评估可行性。用加速度计测量身体活动水平,用德莫顿活动指数评估活动能力。结果共纳入受试者24例(参与率77.4%),其中12例接受干预。没有人中途退出,也没有人失去随访(中途退出率为0%,保留率为100%)。评估干预措施的招募率、保留率、可接受性和安全性是否可行。加速度计80%潜在磨损时间的目标依存度无法确定。无不良事件报告。观察到干预组有较高体力活动的趋势;然而,结果没有统计学意义。尽管参与者人数较少,但行为改变技术在急性中风患者中使用的可行性和安全性以及潜在效果的适应症已经确定。因此,在对参与者的招募和纳入进行调整后,可以建议进行明确的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书