Real-time cognitive-affective dynamics of failure feedback in a technology-based learning task.

IF 6.4
Helene Ackermann, Anna L Lange, Hanna Dumont, Verena V Hafner, Rebecca Lazarides
{"title":"Real-time cognitive-affective dynamics of failure feedback in a technology-based learning task.","authors":"Helene Ackermann, Anna L Lange, Hanna Dumont, Verena V Hafner, Rebecca Lazarides","doi":"10.1038/s44271-026-00487-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As technology-based learning environments increasingly employ automated feedback, understanding how learners process feedback in real time is essential. This study examined how automated cognitive and metacognitive failure feedback delivered by a humanoid robot affected performance and how effects were moderated by feedback characteristics and learner characteristics. Ninety adults (18-59 years, M<sub>age</sub> = 29.53, 61 female, 27 male, 2 diverse) completed a learning task in three conditions: (1) fixed guidance condition with fixed-frequency and content-generic feedback, (2) basic-adaptive condition with frequency-adaptive but content-generic feedback, or (3) personalized-adaptive condition with frequency-adaptive and content-personalized feedback adjusting content to learners specific errors and prior steps. A three-level generalized path model (trials nested within time blocks within learners) was estimated to investigate effects of failure feedback on immediate task performance and cross-level moderation effects. Results showed that cognitive and metacognitive failure feedback increased the likelihood of a correct subsequent response across conditions. Relative to fixed guidance (condition 1), the implemented form of frequency-adaptive feedback (condition 2) did not show statistically significant moderation to these effects. Content-personalized feedback (condition 3) reduced effectiveness of cognitive failure feedback on immediate performance but improved overall performance as compared to content-generic feedback (condition 2). Across conditions, learners with higher cognitive ability benefited less, while those reporting higher momentary on-task boredom benefited more from cognitive feedback. These findings highlight that the effectiveness of automated failure feedback depends on both its design and learners' situational cognitive and emotional states, illustrating how a situational, temporally sensitive approach can help open the \"black box\" of feedback effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13263339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00487-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As technology-based learning environments increasingly employ automated feedback, understanding how learners process feedback in real time is essential. This study examined how automated cognitive and metacognitive failure feedback delivered by a humanoid robot affected performance and how effects were moderated by feedback characteristics and learner characteristics. Ninety adults (18-59 years, Mage = 29.53, 61 female, 27 male, 2 diverse) completed a learning task in three conditions: (1) fixed guidance condition with fixed-frequency and content-generic feedback, (2) basic-adaptive condition with frequency-adaptive but content-generic feedback, or (3) personalized-adaptive condition with frequency-adaptive and content-personalized feedback adjusting content to learners specific errors and prior steps. A three-level generalized path model (trials nested within time blocks within learners) was estimated to investigate effects of failure feedback on immediate task performance and cross-level moderation effects. Results showed that cognitive and metacognitive failure feedback increased the likelihood of a correct subsequent response across conditions. Relative to fixed guidance (condition 1), the implemented form of frequency-adaptive feedback (condition 2) did not show statistically significant moderation to these effects. Content-personalized feedback (condition 3) reduced effectiveness of cognitive failure feedback on immediate performance but improved overall performance as compared to content-generic feedback (condition 2). Across conditions, learners with higher cognitive ability benefited less, while those reporting higher momentary on-task boredom benefited more from cognitive feedback. These findings highlight that the effectiveness of automated failure feedback depends on both its design and learners' situational cognitive and emotional states, illustrating how a situational, temporally sensitive approach can help open the "black box" of feedback effectiveness.

基于技术的学习任务中失败反馈的实时认知-情感动态。
随着基于技术的学习环境越来越多地采用自动反馈,了解学习者如何实时处理反馈是至关重要的。本研究考察了由人形机器人提供的自动认知和元认知失败反馈如何影响表现,以及反馈特征和学习者特征如何调节这种影响。90名成年人(18-59岁,年龄29.53岁,女性61人,男性27人,种族2人)在三种条件下完成了学习任务:(1)固定频率和内容通用反馈的固定指导条件;(2)频率自适应和内容通用反馈的基本自适应条件;(3)频率自适应和内容个性化反馈的个性化自适应条件,根据学习者的具体错误和先前步骤调整内容。一个三层广义路径模型(在学习者的时间块内嵌套试验)被估计来研究失败反馈对即时任务绩效和跨层调节效应的影响。结果表明,认知和元认知失败反馈增加了在不同条件下正确后续反应的可能性。相对于固定制导(条件1),频率自适应反馈(条件2)的实现形式对这些效果没有统计学上显著的调节作用。与内容通用反馈(条件2)相比,内容个性化反馈(条件3)降低了认知失败反馈对即时表现的影响,但提高了整体表现。在不同的条件下,认知能力较高的学习者受益较少,而那些报告瞬时任务无聊程度较高的学习者从认知反馈中受益更多。这些发现强调了自动化失败反馈的有效性取决于其设计和学习者的情境认知和情绪状态,说明了情境、时间敏感的方法如何帮助打开反馈有效性的“黑匣子”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书