Every Second Counts: The School Nurse as a Health Educator - A Cross Sectional Observational Study.

Igiene e sanita pubblica Pub Date : 2026-03-01
Chiara Gatti, Stefano Marcelli, Gloria D'Angelo, Cinzia Borgognoni, Elena Torresi
{"title":"Every Second Counts: The School Nurse as a Health Educator - A Cross Sectional Observational Study.","authors":"Chiara Gatti, Stefano Marcelli, Gloria D'Angelo, Cinzia Borgognoni, Elena Torresi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Schools are key environments for children's daily lives, where urgent events such as syncope, hypoglycemia, seizures, and minor trauma can occur. In Italy, the absence of school nurses and the lack of mandatory first aid training for all teachers place initial emergency management largely on educational staff, whose preparation is variable. Enhancing first aid culture and readiness is therefore essential for prevention, early recognition, and timely response. Aim To assess the training level and preparedness of teachers-from nursery to lower secondary school-in managing pediatric urgent and emergency situations within school settings. Material and Methods A multicenter, descriptive, cross sectional observational study was conducted (April-October 2025) using a structured questionnaire integrating two validated instruments. Participants were recruited from nursery, kindergarten, primary, and lower secondary schools in the Marche region (Italy). Data were summarized as proportions with 95% CIs (Clopper-Pearson). Associations were tested with chi square (exact tests as needed), with effect size via Cramér's V. Significance α=0.05. Correct CPR sequence knowledge was estimated as prevalence. Results The sample included nursery (n=8), kindergarten (n=12), primary (n=23), and lower secondary (n=24) teachers, mostly aged 26-50 years; 64.2% held a university degree. While 91% reported first aid knowledge and 88% had attended at least one course, only 7.5% felt genuinely prepared; 64.2% felt insecure and 28.4% unprepared, and ~90% requested further practical training. Scenario items revealed procedural gaps: only 55.2% prioritized assessing consciousness in an injured/unconscious student; 71.6% would avoid manipulating a sprained ankle; responses on bleeding were split (direct pressure 52.2% vs gentle tamponing 46.3%). Diabetes knowledge was stronger (e.g., insulin via injection 95.5%; insulin does not raise glucose 92.5%), yet uncertainty remained for managing acute episodes on site. On epilepsy, misconceptions were largely rejected, but causal attributions mixed genetics (47.8%) and emotional factors (41.8%). Practical first aid sequencing showed fragmentation; only ~33% (95% CI 22-45%) knew the correct CPR sequence. Training was strongly associated with perceived preparedness (χ²(2)=22.95; p&lt;0.001; V=0.59), age and seniority with lower confidence (V=0.66 and 0.61, respectively), and perception moderately with correct CPR sequence (p=0.003; V≈0.42). Training alone did not correlate with correct CPR sequencing (p=0.366). Discussion Current training reduces outright unpreparedness but often leaves teachers in a state of operational insecurity. Confidence and competence-especially CPR sequencing-appear to require hands on practice, realistic simulations, and regular refreshers rather than single-course exposure. Conclusions Teachers show acceptable theoretical awareness in selected areas but significant practical uncertainties in first aid, especially CPR and initial assessment. Structured, periodic, skills based programs and competency verification are priorities. Integrating the school nurse as a health educator could provide sustainable, on site support for training and emergency readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":73329,"journal":{"name":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","volume":"99 2","pages":"78-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Schools are key environments for children's daily lives, where urgent events such as syncope, hypoglycemia, seizures, and minor trauma can occur. In Italy, the absence of school nurses and the lack of mandatory first aid training for all teachers place initial emergency management largely on educational staff, whose preparation is variable. Enhancing first aid culture and readiness is therefore essential for prevention, early recognition, and timely response. Aim To assess the training level and preparedness of teachers-from nursery to lower secondary school-in managing pediatric urgent and emergency situations within school settings. Material and Methods A multicenter, descriptive, cross sectional observational study was conducted (April-October 2025) using a structured questionnaire integrating two validated instruments. Participants were recruited from nursery, kindergarten, primary, and lower secondary schools in the Marche region (Italy). Data were summarized as proportions with 95% CIs (Clopper-Pearson). Associations were tested with chi square (exact tests as needed), with effect size via Cramér's V. Significance α=0.05. Correct CPR sequence knowledge was estimated as prevalence. Results The sample included nursery (n=8), kindergarten (n=12), primary (n=23), and lower secondary (n=24) teachers, mostly aged 26-50 years; 64.2% held a university degree. While 91% reported first aid knowledge and 88% had attended at least one course, only 7.5% felt genuinely prepared; 64.2% felt insecure and 28.4% unprepared, and ~90% requested further practical training. Scenario items revealed procedural gaps: only 55.2% prioritized assessing consciousness in an injured/unconscious student; 71.6% would avoid manipulating a sprained ankle; responses on bleeding were split (direct pressure 52.2% vs gentle tamponing 46.3%). Diabetes knowledge was stronger (e.g., insulin via injection 95.5%; insulin does not raise glucose 92.5%), yet uncertainty remained for managing acute episodes on site. On epilepsy, misconceptions were largely rejected, but causal attributions mixed genetics (47.8%) and emotional factors (41.8%). Practical first aid sequencing showed fragmentation; only ~33% (95% CI 22-45%) knew the correct CPR sequence. Training was strongly associated with perceived preparedness (χ²(2)=22.95; p<0.001; V=0.59), age and seniority with lower confidence (V=0.66 and 0.61, respectively), and perception moderately with correct CPR sequence (p=0.003; V≈0.42). Training alone did not correlate with correct CPR sequencing (p=0.366). Discussion Current training reduces outright unpreparedness but often leaves teachers in a state of operational insecurity. Confidence and competence-especially CPR sequencing-appear to require hands on practice, realistic simulations, and regular refreshers rather than single-course exposure. Conclusions Teachers show acceptable theoretical awareness in selected areas but significant practical uncertainties in first aid, especially CPR and initial assessment. Structured, periodic, skills based programs and competency verification are priorities. Integrating the school nurse as a health educator could provide sustainable, on site support for training and emergency readiness.

[每一秒都很重要:作为健康教育者的学校护士-一项横断面观察研究]。
学校是儿童日常生活的关键环境,这里可能发生诸如晕厥、低血糖、癫痫发作和轻微创伤等紧急事件。在意大利,由于没有学校护士,也没有对所有教师进行强制性急救培训,初步应急管理主要由教育工作人员负责,而他们的准备情况各不相同。因此,加强急救文化和急救准备对于预防、早期识别和及时反应至关重要。目的评估从幼儿园到初中教师在学校环境中处理儿科急症和紧急情况的培训水平和准备情况。材料与方法本研究于2025年4月至10月进行了一项多中心、描述性、横断面观察性研究,采用整合两种验证工具的结构化问卷。参与者来自马尔凯地区(意大利)的托儿所、幼儿园、小学和初中。数据汇总为95% ci的比例(Clopper-Pearson)。相关性采用卡方检验(根据需要进行精确检验),效应量采用cram s v。显著性α=0.05。正确的心肺复苏顺序知识估计为患病率。结果样本包括幼儿园(8名)、幼儿园(12名)、小学(23名)和初中(24名)教师,年龄以26 ~ 50岁为主;64.2%拥有大学学历。虽然91%的人有急救知识,88%的人至少参加过一门课程,但只有7.5%的人真正做好了准备;64.2%感到不安全,28.4%没有准备,约90%要求进一步的实践培训。情景项目揭示了程序上的差距:只有55.2%的人优先评估受伤/无意识学生的意识;71.6%的人会避免操纵扭伤的脚踝;对出血的反应有分歧(直接按压52.2% vs温和棉塞46.3%)。糖尿病知识较强(例如,注射胰岛素95.5%;胰岛素不升高血糖92.5%),但在现场处理急性发作时仍存在不确定性。对于癫痫,错误的认识在很大程度上被拒绝,但原因归因混合了遗传(47.8%)和情绪因素(41.8%)。实际急救排序呈现碎片化;只有33% (95% CI 22-45%)的患者知道正确的CPR顺序。培训与感知准备程度密切相关(χ 2 (2)=22.95;术中,0.001;V=0.59),年龄和资历置信度较低(V分别=0.66和0.61),正确CPR顺序的感知中等(p=0.003; V≈0.42)。单纯的训练与正确的CPR排序没有相关性(p=0.366)。目前的培训减少了完全的准备不足,但往往使教师处于操作不安全的状态。信心和能力——尤其是心肺复苏术排序——似乎需要动手实践、真实的模拟和定期的复习,而不是单一的课程。结论教师在某些领域的理论意识尚可,但在急救实践中存在较大的不确定性,特别是在心肺复苏术和初步评估方面。结构化的、周期性的、基于技能的项目和能力验证是优先考虑的。将学校护士整合为健康教育工作者可以为培训和应急准备提供可持续的现场支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书