Measuring care complexity: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study - CardioMEO PediCARE (Ancona, Italy)

Igiene e sanita pubblica Pub Date : 2026-03-01
Alessia Galli, Ludovica Mazzieri, Chiara Gatti, Fabienne Yvonne Pallua, Andrea Crognaletti, Alessandra Montini, Elisa Andreoli, Gilda Pelusi
{"title":"Measuring care complexity: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study - CardioMEO PediCARE (Ancona, Italy)","authors":"Alessia Galli, Ludovica Mazzieri, Chiara Gatti, Fabienne Yvonne Pallua, Andrea Crognaletti, Alessandra Montini, Elisa Andreoli, Gilda Pelusi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing clinical complexity of pediatric patients, combined with global nursing workforce shortages, requires reliable tools to measure nursing care complexity and support evidence-based staffing decisions. In highly specialized settings such as pediatric cardiovascular units, patient acuity and cognitive nursing workload are particularly demanding. However, data on validated tools for assessing care complexity in pediatric contexts remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure nursing care complexity in pediatric cardiovascular patients and to identify clinical and organizational factors associated with higher complexity levels using validated pediatric acuity tools.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 313 patient records from the Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery and Cardiology Unit and the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary university hospital in Italy (January-December 2022). Nursing care complexity was assessed using the CAMEO II tool for intensive care and the Inpatient CAMEO tool for ward settings. Descriptive statistics were performed. Associations between complexity and categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of baseline complexity (T0). Statistical significance was set at p 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients admitted to the intensive care unit showed medium nursing care complexity. In the inpatient cardiac unit, 27% of patients had low complexity and 73% had medium complexity; no high-complexity cases were observed. Younger age was significantly associated with higher complexity (B = -0.29, p 0.001). Urgent admission (B = 6.73, p 0.001) and longer hospital stay (B = 0.37, p 0.001) were also significant predictors. Organizational variables, including day of the week and work shift, were not significantly associated with complexity. The regression model explained 46% of the variance in baseline complexity scores (adjusted R² = 0.451).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>In pediatric cardiovascular settings, nursing care complexity is primarily driven by patient-related clinical factors rather than organizational variables. Younger and urgently admitted patients with longer hospital stays require higher cognitive nursing workload. The systematic implementation of validated acuity tools such as CAMEO II and Inpatient CAMEO may support evidence-based workforce planning, optimize nurse-to-patient ratios according to patient acuity, and enhance quality and safety of care. These findings are particularly relevant in the context of healthcare resource constraints and contribute to improving organizational decision-making in specialized pediatric settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73329,"journal":{"name":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","volume":"99 2","pages":"94-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing clinical complexity of pediatric patients, combined with global nursing workforce shortages, requires reliable tools to measure nursing care complexity and support evidence-based staffing decisions. In highly specialized settings such as pediatric cardiovascular units, patient acuity and cognitive nursing workload are particularly demanding. However, data on validated tools for assessing care complexity in pediatric contexts remain limited.

Objective: To measure nursing care complexity in pediatric cardiovascular patients and to identify clinical and organizational factors associated with higher complexity levels using validated pediatric acuity tools.

Material and methods: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 313 patient records from the Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery and Cardiology Unit and the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary university hospital in Italy (January-December 2022). Nursing care complexity was assessed using the CAMEO II tool for intensive care and the Inpatient CAMEO tool for ward settings. Descriptive statistics were performed. Associations between complexity and categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of baseline complexity (T0). Statistical significance was set at p 0.05.

Results: All patients admitted to the intensive care unit showed medium nursing care complexity. In the inpatient cardiac unit, 27% of patients had low complexity and 73% had medium complexity; no high-complexity cases were observed. Younger age was significantly associated with higher complexity (B = -0.29, p 0.001). Urgent admission (B = 6.73, p 0.001) and longer hospital stay (B = 0.37, p 0.001) were also significant predictors. Organizational variables, including day of the week and work shift, were not significantly associated with complexity. The regression model explained 46% of the variance in baseline complexity scores (adjusted R² = 0.451).

Discussion and conclusions: In pediatric cardiovascular settings, nursing care complexity is primarily driven by patient-related clinical factors rather than organizational variables. Younger and urgently admitted patients with longer hospital stays require higher cognitive nursing workload. The systematic implementation of validated acuity tools such as CAMEO II and Inpatient CAMEO may support evidence-based workforce planning, optimize nurse-to-patient ratios according to patient acuity, and enhance quality and safety of care. These findings are particularly relevant in the context of healthcare resource constraints and contribute to improving organizational decision-making in specialized pediatric settings.

[测量护理复杂性:一项回顾性横断面观察性研究- CardioMEO ticare (Ancona, Italy)]。
背景:儿科患者的临床复杂性不断增加,加上全球护理人员短缺,需要可靠的工具来衡量护理复杂性,并支持基于证据的人员配置决策。在高度专业化的设置,如儿科心血管单位,病人的敏锐度和认知护理工作量特别苛刻。然而,关于评估儿科护理复杂性的有效工具的数据仍然有限。目的:测量儿科心血管患者护理复杂性,并使用经过验证的儿科敏锐度工具确定与较高复杂性水平相关的临床和组织因素。材料和方法:对意大利某三级大学医院儿科和先天性心脏外科和心脏病科以及儿科重症监护病房的313例患者进行回顾性横断面观察研究(2022年1月至12月)。使用重症监护的CAMEO II工具和病房设置的住院患者CAMEO工具评估护理复杂性。进行描述性统计。复杂度与分类变量之间的关系采用卡方检验进行分析。进行简单和多元线性回归分析以确定基线复杂性(T0)的预测因子。差异有统计学意义,p < 0.05。结果:所有入住重症监护室的患者护理复杂程度均为中等。在心内科住院患者中,27%的患者复杂性较低,73%的患者复杂性中等;未观察到高复杂性病例。年龄越小,复杂性越高(B = -0.29, p 0.001)。紧急入院(B = 6.73, p 0.001)和较长的住院时间(B = 0.37, p 0.001)也是显著的预测因素。组织变量,包括一周的天数和工作班次,与复杂性没有显著关联。回归模型解释了46%的基线复杂性得分方差(调整后的R²= 0.451)。讨论与结论:在儿科心血管环境中,护理复杂性主要是由患者相关的临床因素而不是组织变量驱动的。较年轻和住院时间较长的急症患者需要更高的认知护理工作量。系统地实施经过验证的视力工具,如CAMEO II和住院患者CAMEO,可以支持基于证据的劳动力规划,根据患者的视力优化护士与患者的比例,并提高护理质量和安全性。这些发现在医疗资源限制的背景下特别相关,有助于改善儿科专业设置的组织决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书