Factors Influencing Nurses' Person-Centred Care Practices in Dementia Care: A Scoping Review Based on the Donabedian Model.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sungjun Kim, Jiyoung Kim, Kyoung Ja Kim
{"title":"Factors Influencing Nurses' Person-Centred Care Practices in Dementia Care: A Scoping Review Based on the Donabedian Model.","authors":"Sungjun Kim, Jiyoung Kim, Kyoung Ja Kim","doi":"10.1111/scs.70259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to identify the structural, process and outcome factors influencing nurses' implementation of person-centred care (PCC) for people with dementia, guided by Donabedian's structure-process-outcome (SPO) model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A scoping review was conducted. The final search was conducted on January 28, 2025, were from the following major international and Korean databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, KCI and NDSL. Studies addressing factors related to nurses' PCC practices in dementia care were systematically analysed and categorized using the SPO model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included in this scoping review. The structural factors included nurses' personal characteristics (e.g., demographics and knowledge), organizational conditions and educational factors; some factors were positively associated with PCC practices (e.g., salary satisfaction), whereas others demonstrated inconsistent findings across studies (e.g., age and clinical experience). Process factors encompassed attitudes, emotional responses, behavioural management and practice strategies, which were identified as facilitators or barriers to PCC practices. The outcome factors indicated that PCC practices were associated with improvements in nurses' knowledge, attitudes, satisfaction, care efficacy and care provision capacity, while being associated with reduced care burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review provided a systematic analysis of the factors influencing nurses' PCC practices in dementia care. Effective promotion of person-centred care requires multifaceted strategies at both the individual nurses and organizational levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":"40 2","pages":"e70259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13263646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to identify the structural, process and outcome factors influencing nurses' implementation of person-centred care (PCC) for people with dementia, guided by Donabedian's structure-process-outcome (SPO) model.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A scoping review was conducted. The final search was conducted on January 28, 2025, were from the following major international and Korean databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, KCI and NDSL. Studies addressing factors related to nurses' PCC practices in dementia care were systematically analysed and categorized using the SPO model.

Results: Fourteen studies were included in this scoping review. The structural factors included nurses' personal characteristics (e.g., demographics and knowledge), organizational conditions and educational factors; some factors were positively associated with PCC practices (e.g., salary satisfaction), whereas others demonstrated inconsistent findings across studies (e.g., age and clinical experience). Process factors encompassed attitudes, emotional responses, behavioural management and practice strategies, which were identified as facilitators or barriers to PCC practices. The outcome factors indicated that PCC practices were associated with improvements in nurses' knowledge, attitudes, satisfaction, care efficacy and care provision capacity, while being associated with reduced care burden.

Conclusion: This review provided a systematic analysis of the factors influencing nurses' PCC practices in dementia care. Effective promotion of person-centred care requires multifaceted strategies at both the individual nurses and organizational levels.

影响痴呆护理中护士以人为本护理实践的因素:基于Donabedian模型的范围审查。
目的:本研究旨在以Donabedian的结构-过程-结果(SPO)模型为指导,探讨影响护士对痴呆患者实施以人为本护理(PCC)的结构、过程和结果因素。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析范围评价首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指南进行范围评价。进行了范围审查。最终检索于2025年1月28日进行,来自以下主要国际和韩国数据库:MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, KCI和NDSL。研究解决痴呆护理中护士PCC实践相关因素使用SPO模型进行系统分析和分类。结果:本综述纳入了14项研究。结构性因素包括护士的个人特征(如人口统计学和知识)、组织条件和学历因素;一些因素与PCC实践呈正相关(例如,工资满意度),而其他因素在研究中表现出不一致的结果(例如,年龄和临床经验)。过程因素包括态度、情绪反应、行为管理和实践策略,这些因素被确定为PCC实践的促进因素或障碍。结果因素显示,护理护理实践与护士的知识、态度、满意度、护理效能和护理提供能力的改善有关,与护理负担的减轻有关。结论:本综述系统分析了痴呆护理中护士PCC实践的影响因素。有效促进以人为本的护理需要在护士个人和组织层面采取多方面的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书