Training climate matters: programmatic openness, individual belonging, and trainee mistreatment in graduate medical education.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2026-12-31 Epub Date: 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2026.2687300
TingLan Ma, Binbin Zheng, Michael Soh, Jerri Curtis, Steven J Durning, Ting Dong
{"title":"Training climate matters: programmatic openness, individual belonging, and trainee mistreatment in graduate medical education.","authors":"TingLan Ma, Binbin Zheng, Michael Soh, Jerri Curtis, Steven J Durning, Ting Dong","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2026.2687300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical trainee mistreatment remains a widespread challenge in graduate medical education, contributing to burnout, depression, and workforce attrition. Graduate medical education programs have sought to create safer learning environments by fostering programmatic openness-climates perceived as transparent, welcoming, and supportive. Yet it remains unclear how such programmatic conditions interact with individual experiences of belonging to shape wellbeing. Drawing on ecological systems theory, we examine how programmatic openness and trainee belonging interact to mitigate trainee mistreatment during residency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an anonymous online survey (Dec 2023-Jan 2024) at three large US teaching sites with 62 GME programs. Scales with robust validity evidence measured perceived programmatic openness, individual belonging, perceived mistreatment, burnout, and social support. We built a latent moderation model, encompassing both confirmatory factor analysis and latent interaction effects. We examined how programmatic openness moderated trainee perceived mistreatment while controlling for social support and trainee demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 675 eligible trainees, 266 responded (39.4%). Measurement models demonstrated good fit, supporting construct validity. Both programmatic openness and belonging were protective against perceived mistreatment, which was strongly associated with burnout. Residents' belonging to the training program was significantly associated with low burnout, even after accounting for social support. Moderation analyses revealed that programmatic openness most strongly buffered mistreatment among trainees who experienced low belonging, with diminished effects at higher belonging levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings revealed a compensatory effect, suggesting the beneficial effects of programmatic openness were especially crucial among trainees who experienced low individual belonging. This finding aligns with the ecological system theory, which posits that supportive environments may mitigate individual-level vulnerabilities. Both burnout and perceived mistreatment were at its lowest when programmatic openness and individual belonging were both present. This underscores the need for residency programs to foster both openness and belonging as core strategies to support trainee wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"31 1","pages":"2687300"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13267041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2026.2687300","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical trainee mistreatment remains a widespread challenge in graduate medical education, contributing to burnout, depression, and workforce attrition. Graduate medical education programs have sought to create safer learning environments by fostering programmatic openness-climates perceived as transparent, welcoming, and supportive. Yet it remains unclear how such programmatic conditions interact with individual experiences of belonging to shape wellbeing. Drawing on ecological systems theory, we examine how programmatic openness and trainee belonging interact to mitigate trainee mistreatment during residency.

Methods: We conducted an anonymous online survey (Dec 2023-Jan 2024) at three large US teaching sites with 62 GME programs. Scales with robust validity evidence measured perceived programmatic openness, individual belonging, perceived mistreatment, burnout, and social support. We built a latent moderation model, encompassing both confirmatory factor analysis and latent interaction effects. We examined how programmatic openness moderated trainee perceived mistreatment while controlling for social support and trainee demographics.

Results: Of 675 eligible trainees, 266 responded (39.4%). Measurement models demonstrated good fit, supporting construct validity. Both programmatic openness and belonging were protective against perceived mistreatment, which was strongly associated with burnout. Residents' belonging to the training program was significantly associated with low burnout, even after accounting for social support. Moderation analyses revealed that programmatic openness most strongly buffered mistreatment among trainees who experienced low belonging, with diminished effects at higher belonging levels.

Conclusion: Findings revealed a compensatory effect, suggesting the beneficial effects of programmatic openness were especially crucial among trainees who experienced low individual belonging. This finding aligns with the ecological system theory, which posits that supportive environments may mitigate individual-level vulnerabilities. Both burnout and perceived mistreatment were at its lowest when programmatic openness and individual belonging were both present. This underscores the need for residency programs to foster both openness and belonging as core strategies to support trainee wellbeing.

培训氛围问题:研究生医学教育中的项目开放性、个人归属感和实习生虐待。
背景:医学培训生虐待仍然是研究生医学教育中普遍存在的挑战,导致职业倦怠、抑郁和劳动力流失。研究生医学教育项目试图通过培养项目开放的氛围来创造更安全的学习环境,这种氛围被认为是透明、欢迎和支持的。然而,目前尚不清楚这种程序性条件是如何与个人的归属感体验相互作用的。利用生态系统理论,我们研究了项目的开放性和实习生的归属感如何相互作用,以减轻实习期间实习生的虐待。方法:我们在美国三个大型教学站点进行了一项匿名在线调查(2023年12月至2024年1月),共有62个GME项目。具有强效性证据的量表测量了感知程序开放性、个体归属感、感知虐待、倦怠和社会支持。我们建立了一个潜在的调节模型,包括验证性因素分析和潜在的相互作用效应。在控制社会支持和培训生人口统计数据的情况下,我们研究了方案开放性如何调节培训生感知到的虐待。结果:在675名符合条件的学员中,有266人回应(39.4%)。测量模型拟合良好,支持结构效度。程序性的开放性和归属感都对感知到的虐待有保护作用,而虐待与倦怠密切相关。即使在考虑了社会支持因素后,住院医师对培训计划的归属与低倦怠显著相关。适度分析显示,在归属感较低的受训者中,方案开放性最有力地缓冲了虐待,在归属感较高的受训者中,效果减弱。结论:研究结果显示了一种补偿效应,表明程序性开放性的有益效果在个体归属感较低的受训者中尤为重要。这一发现与生态系统理论相一致,该理论认为支持性环境可以减轻个人层面的脆弱性。当程序性开放和个人归属感同时存在时,倦怠和感知虐待都是最低的。这就强调了实习计划的必要性,即培养开放性和归属感,作为支持实习生福利的核心策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书