[When IPS Coaching isn't always effective: Findings from the German IPS-ZIB Project].

IF 0.9 4区医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY

Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1055/a-2862-7324

Juliane Bergdolt, Lorenz B Dehn, Julia Schreiter, Stella Hubert, Sarah Jenderny, Martin Driessen, Ingmar Steinhart

{"title":"[When IPS Coaching isn't always effective: Findings from the German IPS-ZIB Project].","authors":"Juliane Bergdolt, Lorenz B Dehn, Julia Schreiter, Stella Hubert, Sarah Jenderny, Martin Driessen, Ingmar Steinhart","doi":"10.1055/a-2862-7324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The project \"IPS-Coaching - Back to Work\" (IPS-ZIB) examined whether IPS coaching improves (re)integration into work compared to standard care.Methods: A prospective, non-randomized, controlled, bicentric study conducted over two years with 244 participants (IPS: n=150; control group/CG: n=94) with affective (90%) or psychotic disorders.Results: There were no sign. differences between IPS (62%) and VG (64%) in terms of re-employment, applications for disability pension and sheltered workshop, days until to job (re)entry or the duration of employment. Having an existing employment contract at the start of the study was generally associated with a higher integration rate.Conclusions: IPS did not show superiority over standard care. The high integration rate in both groups suggests generally favorable employment conditions in this specific sample and possibly special study conditions. Individuals without employment contracts require targeted support.","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":"350-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2862-7324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The project "IPS-Coaching - Back to Work" (IPS-ZIB) examined whether IPS coaching improves (re)integration into work compared to standard care.

Methods: A prospective, non-randomized, controlled, bicentric study conducted over two years with 244 participants (IPS: n=150; control group/CG: n=94) with affective (90%) or psychotic disorders.

Results: There were no sign. differences between IPS (62%) and VG (64%) in terms of re-employment, applications for disability pension and sheltered workshop, days until to job (re)entry or the duration of employment. Having an existing employment contract at the start of the study was generally associated with a higher integration rate.

Conclusions: IPS did not show superiority over standard care. The high integration rate in both groups suggests generally favorable employment conditions in this specific sample and possibly special study conditions. Individuals without employment contracts require targeted support.

查看原文本刊更多论文

[当IPS教练并不总是有效：来自德国IPS- zib项目的发现]。

目的：“IPS- coaching - Back to Work”（IPS- zib）项目考察与标准护理相比，IPS coaching是否能改善（重新）融入工作。方法：一项为期两年的前瞻性、非随机、对照、双中心研究，共有244名患有情感性（90%）或精神障碍的参与者（IPS组：n=150；对照组/CG组：n=94）。结果：无明显征象。在再就业、申请残疾养恤金和庇护车间、工作（再）入职前的天数或就业时间方面，IPS（62%）和VG（64%）之间存在差异。在研究开始时拥有现有的雇佣合同通常与较高的整合率相关。结论：IPS治疗不优于标准治疗。两组的高整合率表明，在这个特定的样本中，总体上有利的就业条件，可能是特殊的研究条件。没有劳动合同的个人需要有针对性的支持。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

9.10%

发文量

103

期刊介绍： Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien